7 measurements spanning 36 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 956–982 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 08:56
979
+2
5 Sept 2026, 14:22
977
no change
2 Sept 2026, 21:15
977
+3
27 Aug 2026, 17:03
974
+6
20 Aug 2026, 10:27
968
+8
6 Aug 2026, 12:10
960
+1
6 Aug 2026, 08:16
959
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.69%
avg views ÷ 979 subscribers
Avg views / post
75.3
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026
Posts held
20 (3 September 2026 – 5 September 2026)
Views total
1,505
Reactions total
65
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
65 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5850415463460246527
60
92.3%
custom 6003343868592919724
3
4.62%
custom 5850210649354802766
2
3.08%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 September 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Kunnasha7. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 September 2026 to 5 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
قال الحافظ أبو عبد الله محمد بن إسحاق بن منده الأصبهاني رحـمـه الـلّٰـه :
فهؤلاء حفاظ العلم والدين النافون عنه تحريف غال وتدليس مدلس وانتحال مبطل وتأويل جاحد ومكيدة ملحد فهم الذين وصفهم الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم ودعا لهم وأمرهم بالإبلاغ عنه فهذه الطائفة هم الذين استحقوا أن يقبل ما جوزوه وأن يرد ما جرحوه وإلى قولهم يرجع عند ادعاء من حرف وتدليس مدلس ومكيدة ملحد وكذلك إلى قولهم يرجع أهل القرآن في معرفة أسانيد القراءات …
قال شيخ الإسلام ابن تيميّة رحمه الله : حدثني الثقة من أصحابنا، عن شيخ من أهل العلم، أنه سمع هذا المصنف -يعني شمس الدين الأصبهاني- يقول للشيخ إبراهيم الجعبري : بِتُّ البارحة أفكّر في دليلٍ عقليّ على التوحيد ليس له مُعارض فلم أجد.
فأجابه الجعبري بما يناسب حال نفسه وقال له:
كنتَ قلتَ: ﴿ قُلۡ هُوَ ٱللَّهُ أَحَدٌ ٱللَّهُ ٱلصَّمَدُ لَمۡ یَلِدۡ وَلَمۡ یُولَدۡ وَلَمۡ یَكُن لَّهُۥ كُفُوًا أَحَدُۢ ﴾
『 📖| شرح الأصبهاني…
كما قال قائلهم:
لعَمري لقد طَفْتُ المعاهدَ كلَّها
وسَيَّرْتُ طَرْفي بين تلك المعالمِ
فلم أرَ إلا واضعاً كفَّ حائرٍ
على ذَقْنٍ أو قارِعًا سِنَّ نادمِ
صاحب الحديث:
لعلَّك أهملتَ الطوافَ بمعهدِ
الرُّسُولِ ومَنْ لقاهُ من كلِّ عالمِ
فما حارَ من يهدي بهدي محمَّدٍ
ولستَ تراهُ قارِعًا سنَّ نادمِ
آخر:
أظُنُّكَ أهملْتَ الطوافَ بمعهدِ
لِخَيْرِ الهُداةِ المُرسَلِينَ الأكارمِ
وطُوفْتَ في عَمْياءَ بادٍ ضَلالُها
بناها ذوو…
من الأمور التي أعدها في مناقب الشيخ عبد الله الخليفي إرجاعه عامَّة -بل كل- المسائل التي يثيرها المشاققون حول الأحكام والأخبار الشرعيّة، إلى تقريرات أهل الحديث والأثر في باب التوحيد ومعرفة الله تعالى، كالاستدلال بحكمة الله عز وجل على شرعه، وكذلك الأمر في القدر، وهذا الاستدلال من تأمَّل فيه وجده لا يقوم إلا على مذهب أهل الحديث في الإيمان بحكمة الله عز وجل، ومثل هذه المعالجة لهذه القضايا علمتني أمورًا كثيرة، منها:
1- أ…
آية عجيبة في سورة الممتحنة!
قال ربنا سبحانه وتعالى: قد كانت لكم أسوةٌ حسنة في إبراهيم والذين معه إذ قالوا لقومهم إنا برآء منكم ومما تعبدون من دون الله كفرنا بكم وبدا بيننا وبينكم العداوةُ والبغضاءُ أبدا حتى تؤمنوا بالله وحده.
تأمل القوة والوضوح في إعلان البراءة من الكفر وأهله، وليس كما يقول مدعي الإنسانية الإسلامية المقنعة: أكره الكفر ولا أكره الكافر، أو أكره المعصية ولا أكره العاصي.
وتأمل قوله: حتى تؤمنوا بالله و…
『 حكم صلاة الضحى 』
قال إسحاق بن منصور: صلاة الضحى؟
قال الإمام أحمد رحـمـه الـلّٰـه : ثماني ركعات المثبت عن أم هانئ رضي الله عنهما (١).
قال إسحاق بن راهويه رحـمـه الـلّٰـه : إن صلى ثمانيا فهو أفضل وأعلى، ثم الست، ثم أربع، ثم ركعتين، كل ذلك قد ذكر عن النبي ﷺ
『 📖| مسائل إسحاق بن منصور (304) 』
(١): روى البخاري رحـمـه الـلّٰـه (1176) فقال: حَدَّثَنَا آدَمُ، حَدَّثَنَا شُعْبَةُ، حَدَّثَنَا عَمْرُو بْنُ مُرَّةَ، قَالَ…
قال مجاهد رحـمـه الـلّٰـه :
قال لي ابن عمر: يا مجاهد إذا أصبحت فلا تحدث نفسك بالمساء، وإذا أمسيت فلا تحدث نفسك بالصباح، وخذ من صحتك قبل سقمك، ومن حياتك قبل موتك، فإنك لا تدري ما اسمك غدا.
『 📖| وكيع في الزهد (12) 』
عادةً عندما يُسأل الريس عن سبب التحذير من كتب سيد قطب والسكوت عن كتب الأشاعرة كابن حجر والنووي يقول: الخير الذي في كتب الأشاعرة أكثر بكثير من الشر، والأخطاء التي فيها لا تُذكر مقارنة بما فيها من فوائد.
طيب السؤال: هل كتاب السنة لعبد الله ابن الإمام أحمد الذي يبرر الريس حرقه أكثر ما فيه من كلام عادل آل حمدان أم كلام السلف؟ وهل الخير الذي فيه أكثر أم الشر؟
يقول إن في تحقيقات الشيخ عادل أخطاء عقدية ومصائب، فهلا خرج…
custom 58504154634602465275
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Kunnasha7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“『 رَضِيَ اللّهُ عَنْهُمْ وَرَضُواْ عَنْهُ 』” (@Kunnasha7), 979 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kunnasha7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.