Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 65 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27–30 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Oct 2026, 19:57
28
+1
4 Sept 2026, 08:41
27
-1
28 Aug 2026, 14:48
28
-1
14 Aug 2026, 13:15
29
-1
11 Aug 2026, 04:15
30
no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:17
30
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
23 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
10
43.5%
❤
6
26.1%
🆒
2
8.70%
👍
2
8.70%
👏
2
8.70%
💯
1
4.35%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2023 to 14 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Did you know that Leonoor's Cryptoman can now also be found on Persistence?
https://www.mintscan.io/persistence/validators/persistencevaloper1pcy2f3mrutccpt9gnzdujh5p8yp375dc697vdr
Validator ✅
ReStake activated ✅
Governance forum bookmarked ✅
Looking forwards to the journey together!
(and delegations are welcome! 😉)
https://twitter.com/LeosCryptoman/status/1768360876485029912
I've subscribed as a Pilot (Validator) role in this exciting upcoming testnet.
Will you join as well and become part of my crew?
Follow this link to subscribe as Crew, we'll join up later :)
https://namada.deform.cc/shielded-expedition-crew/
https://twitter.com/LeosCryptoman/status/1738152004541682148
With the validators online on Planq and back on Chihuahua it was time to update ReStake as well:
https://restake.app/chihuahua/chihuahuavaloper1r3fhvm288jzs6dcuww2q0zhvqkaj2ex6zzlzzq
https://restake.app/planq/plqvaloper1jzv668qyy5znqan4nl5thwru2z0d4y8k9m6l2d
And, do not forget that you can also self-manage restaking via
Yieldmos: https://yieldmos.com/v/leonoor-s-cryptoman/
https://twitter.com/LeosCryptoman/status/…
A complete overview can be found again in the pinned messages.
Also one included below:
The following validators are active:
Osmosis:
https://www.mintscan.io/osmosis/validators/osmovaloper14amduhjazqhwtkhm6kutdcy4ux5zazf5k803tq
BitCanna:
https://www.mintscan.io/bitcanna/validators/bcnavaloper1wy5rlr4l5gury0evnhwdknyj9xx5gjtstfas7r
Comdex:
https://www.mintscan.io/comdex/validators/comdexvaloper1ccmys9wyh97khl5wve89…
We are sooo back @ChihuahuaChain
#SecondLife
https://mintscan.io/chihuahua/validators/chihuahuavaloper1r3fhvm288jzs6dcuww2q0zhvqkaj2ex6zzlzzq
https://twitter.com/LeosCryptoman/status/1736054869973176536
Did you know there is a new validator in the Leonoor's Cryptoman imperium?
We are now live on Planq (https://t.me/planqnetwork)!
https://explorer.nodestake.top/planq/staking/plqvaloper1jzv668qyy5znqan4nl5thwru2z0d4y8k9m6l2d
A Dutch company focussing on making mobile crypto apps as easy as possible, which means in the current era prepping for the future.
https://twitter.com/LeosCryptoman/status/173523985964669370…
Yeah! Leonoor's Cryptoman has been chosen🥳
To participate you only need to delegate to us on Osmosis, and wait until the time-weighted OSMO-average of your delegation hits at least 100 $OSMO.
Then you can claim a lootbox and who knows, maybe you get lucky!
https://coinhall.org/rewards/osmo1h8yjueju534hyw3w9vyvd54r8678uyq90pr9gczdkpeve7etll6s6ztwsu
https://twitter.com/LeosCryptoman/status/1719297597800698173
Prop #651 is live on @osmosiszone
(https://mintscan.io/osmosis/proposals/651).
This involves activating the taker fee of 0.1% for swaps.
If you are curious to learn more, find it here:
https://leonoorscryptoman.medium.com/osmosis-taker-fee-5c049f16d5a6
https://twitter.com/LeosCryptoman/status/1712408356814528575
This evening we took down the 3 mentioned validators sadly. (Terp, Chihuahua and the Leonoor's Cryptoman validator on Bitcanna (we are still there with Leonoor's Hangout!))
We hope all delegators find a good new home and we look forwards to still be at your service on the other chains where we can be found!
Thanks for your trust in us and rest assured; governance stays our core prio.
https://twitter.com/LeosCrypto…
Using OmniFlixTV from OmniFlix we can now create interactive videos. It was really easy!
Check out my first video and complete the poll near the end. I'll create more videos involving governance soon!
https://omniflix.tv/iv/65036890e678e9fc46474956
https://fxtwitter.com/LeosCryptoman/status/1702577522607571353
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LC_Announcements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@LC_Announcements named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@chihuahuachain named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Leonoor’s Cryptomans Announcement Channel” (@LC_Announcements), 28 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LC_Announcements.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.