Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OSMOSIS

Channel

OSMOSIS

@osmosiszone

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

203subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001113889962
TypeChannel
Username@osmosiszone
Created15 February 2021measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/osmosiszone

Growth

2032052046 August 2026 — 205 subscribers7 August 2026 — 205 subscribers14 August 2026 — 204 subscribers23 August 2026 — 203 subscribers7 September 2026 — 204 subscribers15 September 2026 — 203 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 39 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 203–205 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 08:17203-1
7 Sept 2026, 09:55204+1
23 Aug 2026, 07:18203-1
14 Aug 2026, 19:55204-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:00205no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:00205first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 15 February 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

25 Mar 2022, 06:49 UTC≈2,590 viewsread 7 August 2026

🧿Updates From the Lab ION DAO Edition🧪 https://youtu.be/7AiYsxsEpos and podcast format https://podcast.labupdates.zone/1900655/10306509-updates-from-the-lab-3-23-ion-dao?t=0

7 Feb 2022, 15:46 UTC≈2,770 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://www.reddit.com/r/OsmosisLab/comments/sk7c3f/security_education

5 Jan 2022, 16:03 UTC≈2,220 viewsread 7 August 2026

The Community Support DAO (name change pending) is hosting its first community town hall on Wednesday, January 05 at 18:00 UTC. Join Osmosis co-founder Sunny Aggarwal, members of the Community Support DAO, and your fellow Osmonauts at our first official Town Hall video stream! We'll be discussing community support and seeking your input. To get on the mic for the Q&A, please dm @madcatattack or @RoboMcGobo on Disco

30 Aug 2021, 23:24 UTC≈2,500 viewsread 7 August 2026

Regular incentive adjustment proposal is up, please go vote: https://www.mintscan.io/osmosis/proposals/30

27 Aug 2021, 03:26 UTC≈2,250 viewsread 7 August 2026

Alright, prop 28 pushed into voting period: https://www.mintscan.io/osmosis/proposals/28

2 Aug 2021, 14:03 UTC≈2,220 viewsread 7 August 2026

Pending IBC tx interface is now live on https://app.osmosis.zone/assets

24 Jul 2021, 03:51 UTC≈1,670 viewsread 7 August 2026

Fellow ATOM holders here, PROP 52 it's live. Only 2 voting days left! Let's go, vote! And remember, you can easily overwritte your validators if you don't like what they voted! https://www.mintscan.io/cosmos/proposals/52

8 Jul 2021, 22:42 UTC≈1,630 viewsread 7 August 2026

We're coming close to finalizing an ION use case. Please join the conversation over here: https://t.me/IONGovernanceWorkingGroup

4 Jul 2021, 02:22 UTC≈1,440 viewsread 7 August 2026

Osmosis Full Guide is here: https://osmosis.gitbook.io/o/

22 Jun 2021, 14:53 UTC≈1,190 viewsread 7 August 2026

⚗️ Welcome to Osmosis Labs ⚗️ the Cosmos AMM This is Osmosis|$OSMO official channel: We love jockes but please stay respectful and avoid racism, sexism, and any other kind of non inclusive topic. Price chats are allowed. ⚠️⚠️⚠️ Beware ⚠️⚠️⚠️ Admins will never DM you first or ask for your Seed Phrase! ⚗️ Get Started with Osmosis ⚗️ 🧪Osmosis DeX 🧪 Must-Read Docs • [Vision for Osmosis] • [Osmosis: A H

21 Jun 2021, 06:10 UTC871 viewsread 7 August 2026

Hey everyone! Just wanted to give an update about the "stuck funds" issue that happened earlier today. Osmosis was the first time IBC was ever actually used at scale. We basically tripled the number of IBC txs ever made, in just the last 12 hours. Talk about testing in prod... And for the most part it worked seamlessly :) However, ~0.3% of all the txs got stuck in transit between chains We're still investigat

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @osmosiszone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OSMOSIS” (@osmosiszone), 203 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/osmosiszone.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.