https://webinar.leanmurali.com/LeanSixSigma-Training
Register 👆🏿To Join FREE Lean Six Sigma Training.
-----🎯To Help 1 Million Passionate Professionals To Become Lean Campions🏆 - Dr. Lean Murali - Lean Master Coach
Created
Between 1 October 2018 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +240. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,412–43,846 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 01:00
43,711
-27
16 Sept 2026, 18:18
43,738
+10
14 Sept 2026, 17:37
43,728
-8
13 Sept 2026, 07:00
43,736
-15
11 Sept 2026, 12:19
43,751
+4
5 Sept 2026, 15:54
43,747
-18
3 Sept 2026, 17:35
43,765
+25
2 Sept 2026, 09:04
43,740
-7
1 Sept 2026, 09:56
43,747
-3
31 Aug 2026, 09:08
43,750
+21
30 Aug 2026, 06:05
43,729
-30
29 Aug 2026, 03:54
43,759
-17
28 Aug 2026, 01:03
43,776
+9
27 Aug 2026, 04:13
43,767
-7
26 Aug 2026, 04:37
43,774
-10
25 Aug 2026, 06:32
43,784
-12
24 Aug 2026, 07:59
43,796
+34
22 Aug 2026, 18:45
43,762
+21
21 Aug 2026, 07:44
43,741
-10
20 Aug 2026, 08:52
43,751
first reading
Engagement
216 posts held, back to 27 November 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 90 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.58%
avg views ÷ 43,711 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,130
97 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.224%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
115
of 216 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 46 of 97 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
216 (27 November 2020 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
109,352
Reactions total
118
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
21 Sept 2026, 21:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
6
Links
6
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
352 reactions across 89 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
149
42.3%
❤
104
29.5%
👏
47
13.4%
🏆
28
7.95%
🍾
9
2.56%
🙏
4
1.14%
⚡
3
0.852%
🤔
2
0.568%
🤣
2
0.568%
🤯
2
0.568%
👌
1
0.284%
😁
1
0.284%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 98 of the 216 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 352 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 216 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2020 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📕Do you need a great book on Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
👇🏾Here is a COMPLETE- A-STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE📚
🆓 for first 99 registrants ONLY
LIMITED Copies ‼️
Apply Now:👉🏻 https://tinyurl.com/Free-Weekly-eBook
Note: This is FREE only for first 99 registrants only
FREE LinkedIn Skill-X Live Session
https://webinar.valueenablers.com/Linkedin-SkillX
Learn how to turn LinkedIn into Jobs, Leads & Clients
👨🎓 Students – Get your first job quickly
👔 Professionals – Get your dream job faster
💼 Freelancers – Find the right clients early
Date :19 Sep 2026
Time :11:00 AM IST
👉 Register now – limited seats!
https://webinar.valueenablers.com/Linkedin-SkillX
FREE LinkedIn Skill-X Live Session
https://webinar.valueenablers.com/Linkedin-SkillX
Learn how to turn LinkedIn into Jobs, Leads & Clients
👨🎓 Students – Get your first job quickly
👔 Professionals – Get your dream job faster
💼 Freelancers – Find the right clients early
Date :19 Sep 2026
Time :11:00 AM IST
👉 Register now – limited seats!
https://webinar.valueenablers.com/Linkedin-SkillX
📚LEAN SIX SIGMA Learning📖
🔗https://tinyurl.com/Deployment-Flowcharts-Mapping
Please share your comments in this article on
Deployment Flowcharts: Mapping Work Across Teams
🔗https://tinyurl.com/Deployment-Flowcharts-Mapping
Happy LEARNing & LEANing
Dr. Lean Murali
What is one similarity between Lean Process Management and Six Sigma?
a. Lean focuses on creating waste in processes4%
b. Six Sigma is only concerned with single quality events11%
c. Both are concerned with continuous improvements81%
d. Lean and Six Sigma are unrelated methodologies4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 216 posts we hold for @LEANCHAMPIONS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 28 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
In lean thinking, which type of MUDA is often referred to as non-value-added waste?
a) Type-1 MUDA27%
b) Type-2 MUDA35%
c) Both34%
d) Neither3%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 216 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2020 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Industrial Knowledge @nikunjbhoraniya · 25,066 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 September 2026
Recent Job Openings for Experienced and Freshers @Recruitmenservices · 28,006 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LEAN-CHAMPIONS” (@LEANCHAMPIONS), 43,711 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LEANCHAMPIONS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.