Channel
Quality and process professional group
@QAQC5
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,489subscribers
+96 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001520820551 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @QAQC5 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/QAQC5 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:05 | 3,489 | +4 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:07 | 3,485 | +2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 07:06 | 3,483 | +5 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:36 | 3,478 | +2 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 18:27 | 3,476 | +8 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 08:38 | 3,468 | +15 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 05:17 | 3,453 | +17 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 3,436 | +27 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 3,409 | +10 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 01:19 | 3,399 | +6 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:29 | 3,393 | no change |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 3,393 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@nikunjbhoraniya · 24,626
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 September 2026
@LEANCHAMPIONS · 43,034
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 September 2026
@whatispiping · 22,778
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Quality and process professional group” (@QAQC5), 3,489 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QAQC5.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.