A new month. A stronger ecosystem. A louder community. ⚡ September could be one of the most important months yet for $LF. If you’ve been here from the early days, this one is for you. 🔥 September belongs to LF holders. https://x.com/lflabstoken/status/2095882868832846258

Channel
LF Labs (Formerly Lovely Finance)
@LF_Labs
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
677,628subscribers
-38,637 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001411085743 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LF_Labs |
| Description | 🔗 Contract: 0x957c7fA189a408E78543113412f6Ae1a9b4022C4 📈 CMC: coinmarketcap.com/currencies/lflabs 🌐 Website: lflabs.fund 🐦 X (Twitter): @LF_LabsFund 🤝 Partnerships/Collabs: 📩 [email protected] 👤 @John_LFLabs (CEO) |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LF_Labs |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 677,628 | -3,364 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:35 | 680,992 | -1,864 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:49 | 682,856 | -1,178 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:53 | 684,034 | -1,864 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 685,898 | -866 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 686,764 | -1,454 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 688,218 | -1,353 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 689,571 | -1,223 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 690,794 | -953 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 691,747 | -1,222 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 692,969 | -854 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 693,823 | -2,438 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:44 | 696,261 | -2,096 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 698,357 | -1,233 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 699,590 | -839 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 700,429 | -989 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:22 | 701,418 | -1,082 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:59 | 702,500 | -1,593 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 704,093 | -2,031 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 706,124 | first reading |
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.303%
- avg views ÷ 677,628 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,050
- 21 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 21
- of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 44 (27 July 2026 – 4 September 2026) |
| Views total | 43,120 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 14:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈660
- Videos
- ≈42
- Links
- ≈1,540
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 36s
- Average length
- 36s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
BSC News 📈 Something Unexpected 💫 https://x.com/bscdailyn/status/2094745407754801615
A new Bitget Web3 article is live while Bitget community sentiment stands at: ✅ 27.3K+ votes ✅ 95% GOOD https://web3.bitget.com/dapp/lf-labs-25196 ⏳ Another milestone. 👀🔥 Let's Make Some Noise 👇👇👇 https://x.com/LFLabsToken/status/2094736081325563950?s=20
Solana Native News Media Stated on #10 Burning of LF 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 https://x.com/solanadailyn/status/2094156729726775621
News Media Report https://x.com/bitcoinworldn/status/2094041858607653171
🔥 Burn #10 is coming… The last burn #9 reached 100M LF. Now it’s your turn to predict the next one. 👀 How much LF will Burn #10 remove? Drop your guess below. 👇 https://x.com/lflabstoken/status/2093912795087839506
You’ve seen the burns. You’ve seen the products. Now watch the ecosystem connect. 🔥 Lovely Legends → LF Pay → LF POS → LF Swap → LF APEX → LF Card → Lil’ John → Web3 Accelerator. This is how momentum compounds: product by product, utility by utility, community by community. 🌐 lflabs.fund https://x.com/LFLabsToken/status/2093069498802966601?s=20
🔥 From 9.5M to 100M LF per burn. 100,000,000 LF Burned Today! Txn Hash: https://etherscan.io/tx/0x311b3548600affe28cae93d51a38e741be719c8ddc4025d7f7963ddef03f8804 Our revenue-driven burn model keeps accelerating. The 9th Burn Event, combining Week 9 + Week 10 revenue, burned 100,000,000 LF. 🔥 Total LF burned: 409.09M 🔥 Supply burned: 4.0909% https://x.com/lflabstoken/status/2093018353728356518
📖 LF Wallet Whitepaper Now LIVE! Everything behind the LF Wallet ecosystem and $LWT is now available in one official document. Built with a long-term vision. Ready for the next chapter. 🚀 Whitepaper: https://lfwallet.app/whitepaper.html https://x.com/LFWallet/status/2091476570338938942?s=20
60,000+ LF Wallet Users ▰ VERIFIED ✅ The Editor-in-Chief of Bitcoin World News has verified and confirmed that LF Wallet has surpassed 60,000 users and the number keeps rising! Real users. Real product. Verified growth. Next: $LWT TGE. 🚀 Article: https://bitcoinworld.news/article/altcoins/lf-wallet-smashes-past-60000-users-lwt-era-approaches https://x.com/BitcoinWorldN/status/2090778552409137270?s=20
🚀 Your Network = Your $LWT Rewards The LF Wallet airdrop referral program is built to reward growth. Invite more friends. Unlock higher tiers. Earn up to 1,200 $LWT per referral at the top level. 🔥 👥 1–5 → 200 $LWT each ⚡ 6–10 → 300 $LWT each 💎 11–50 → 500 $LWT each 🚀 51–100 → 700 $LWT each 🔥 101–500 → 1,000 $LWT each 🏆 501+ → 1,200 $LWT each Airdrop: @LFWallet_AirdropBot Don’t just join the airdrop, grow your n…
🔥 25,000 $TUT Airdrop is LIVE! 1) Claim Today’s Daily Streak on the Lovely Legends App 2) Like & Repost 3) Comment your Lovely Legends UID ▰▰▰▰ Participate ▰▰▰▰ Lovely Legends: @LovelyLegends_Bot Complete all steps to secure your entry into the 25,000 TUT Airdrop. Good luck, Legends! 💚🚀
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @LF_Labs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@blumcrypto · 14,700,866#1
@tomarket_ai · 6,805,930#2
@theyescoin · 5,828,260#3
@banana_update · 1,416,998#4
@catapult_extreme · 8,681,649#5
@fx_holding_community · 6,178,944#6
@TimeFarmChannel · 5,414,355#7
@boomloudcoin · 1,696,451#8
@theTapCoins · 2,972,009#9
@Cats_housewtf · 8,129,863#10
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 4,061,340#11
@Holdcoin_Channel · 2,225,993#12
@trendingapps · 3,864,524#13
@iamalexfalcon · 3,153,710#14
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,551,951#15
@nomis_protocol · 1,572,584#16
@therealyescoin · 2,125,659#17
@catgoldminerann · 920,002#18
@smpl_app · 1,644,591#19
@gameechannel · 1,925,980#20
@WILD_EC0SYSTEM · 1,102,911#21
@Monkey_on_TON · 833,040#22
@EraOfExplorers · 727,992#23
@Birds_announcement · 1,568,804#24
@Coin_Strategist · 1,059,241#25
@activitylauncher_offical · 4,627,711#26
@olycoin_official · 328,524#27
@obixtoken · 539,214#28
@CherryTrendingEVM · 871,561#29
@CloutCoinSol · 980,124#30
@cedex_io · 1,130,265#31
@cosmobear_io · 770,274#32
@clear_feed_media · 515,356#33
@else_app · 338,046#34
@dogs · 7,196,362#35
@hamster_kombat · 21,257,954#36
@realgoats_channel · 4,773,562#37
@hexnio · 2,032,331#38
@token_1win · 3,036,070#39
@seedupdates · 8,363,920#40
@notcoin · 8,803,455#41
@pigscrew · 2,182,770#42
@babydogecoin · 1,034,620#43
@rockyrabbitio · 3,557,418#44
@coincoinai · 1,783,809#45
@catizenann · 3,641,479#46
@dotcoincommunity · 4,046,866#47
@onus_globalchannel · 1,682,270#48
@corn_battles · 1,057,169#49
@tapswapai · 10,541,428#50
@the_vertus · 2,182,119#51
@hotonnear · 4,747,491#52
@deckforge_official · 2,100,491#53
@gram · 6,785,001#54
@tonstationgames · 3,254,817#55
@TaskNChannel · 929,862#56
@cryptowallet_news_en · 3,565,591#57
@monorixofficial · 1,354,904#58
@watbird · 1,504,082#59
@hayzonn · 2,886,200#60
@ONE_Quest_sub · 3,087,303#61
@autoruss · 848,510#62
@pixelverse_xyz · 3,179,204#63
@notboredpuppies_news · 1,165,095#64
@builders · 3,470,622#65
@tabi_ann · 1,960,511#66
@boopupdates · 1,332,706#67
@CryptoKingKeyur · 684,644#68
@tonkeeper_news · 4,852,450#69
@coindotnewsann · 517,653#70
@metazoneofficial · 573,151#71
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,233,704#72
@CryptoAirdrop · 557,766#73
@battle_games_com · 2,731,488#74
@diamoremarket · 338,996#75
@cryptoranknews · 690,653#76
@pocketfi · 1,831,255#77
@money · 3,047,302#78
@theYescoin_News · 331,712#79
@AtheneNetwork_Ann · 738,376#80
@matchain_fam · 1,947,612#81
@theFreeDogs_ANN · 1,699,610#82
@mediarussia · 1,519,076#83
@smc_Kapil_Dev · 422,262#84
@vestirussia · 1,003,439#85
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ChatCoinAnn · 39,060
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
@newcoin_announce · 31,385
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 6 September 2026
@crossfichain · 127,493
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026
@Vinu_News · 146,038
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
@BabyDogeAnnHI · 86,171
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 August 2026
@ShibaInu_Dogecoinkiller · 72,596
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
@cryptoamanclub · 105,397
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@Plank_Pushers · 91,788
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
@HmstrsCommunity · 78,069
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
@wazirx · 100,242
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
@nmmy123 · 31,387
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 6 September 2026
@PikaInfinity · 40,321
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
@poolpays_official · 33,427
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 4 September 2026
@CoinDCX_Announcements · 184,055
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
@ttcoinofficial · 113,132
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
@officialgomble · 131,532
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
@coindotnewsann · 517,653
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 August 2026
@GsonlinebyNishatsir · 29,122
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 8 September 2026
@smc_Kapil_Dev · 422,262
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
@bitcoinexpertindia · 38,823
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
@SmartViewAI · 44,776
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
@Ripple_exch · 75,393
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
2 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LF Labs (Formerly Lovely Finance)” (@LF_Labs), 677,628 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LF_Labs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.