Channel
Law Notes
@Lawedify
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,532subscribers
+126 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001418615182 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Lawedify |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Lawedify |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 5,532 | +10 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 5,522 | +14 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:21 | 5,508 | +22 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 5,486 | +14 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:04 | 5,472 | +22 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:11 | 5,450 | no change |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 5,450 | +13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 5,437 | +13 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 5,424 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 5,421 | +9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 5,412 | +5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 5,407 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 5,406 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@IndianLawBooks · 26,047
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 September 2026
@LawPrepJudiciary · 23,837
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 September 2026
@UGC_NET_JRF_NTA_CSIR_SO · 147,519
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Law Notes” (@Lawedify), 5,532 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lawedify.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.