⚖️ 4 CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS EVERY JUDICIARY ASPIRANT MUST KNOW! Revise these landmark amendments and their key provisions to strengthen your Constitutional Law preparation. 📚 💬 How many did you already know?

Channel
Law Prep | Judiciary Preparation
@LawPrepJudiciary
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,878subscribers
+331 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001916444098 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LawPrepJudiciary |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 52 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LawPrepJudiciary |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 02:59 | 23,878 | +6 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 05:09 | 23,872 | -3 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:19 | 23,875 | +1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 07:38 | 23,874 | -3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:58 | 23,877 | -11 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:30 | 23,888 | +6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 10:16 | 23,882 | +10 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 08:06 | 23,872 | +5 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:47 | 23,867 | +3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 07:37 | 23,864 | +1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:16 | 23,863 | +4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 07:19 | 23,859 | +6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:17 | 23,853 | -11 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 02:31 | 23,864 | -12 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 04:01 | 23,876 | -5 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 04:48 | 23,881 | +5 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 05:09 | 23,876 | -4 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 08:05 | 23,880 | -2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 04:39 | 23,882 | +5 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 03:40 | 23,877 | first reading |
Engagement
570 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.31%
- avg views ÷ 23,878 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 551
- 240 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.279%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 240
- of 570 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 64 of 240 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 570 (9 August 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 132,291 |
| Reactions total | 110 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 21:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
381 reactions across 157 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 191 | 50.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 42 | 11.0% | |
| 😱 | 36 | 9.45% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 8.14% | |
| 💯 | 17 | 4.46% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 3.41% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 3.15% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 3.15% | |
| 🤯 | 10 | 2.62% | |
| 🤡 | 9 | 2.36% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 1.05% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 0.787% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.262% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 192 of the 570 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 381 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 570 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🚨We Are Live Now🚨 🔗Link: https://youtube.com/live/6O3DMN84-j0?feature=share
🔴 LIVE TODAY AT 6 PM | LAW PREP JUDICIARY ⚖️ 📚 AIBE 22 Exam | Top 1500 MCQs – Day 20 | With Venugopal Sir 🎯 IN THIS SESSION: 🔹 Important MCQs for AIBE 22 🔹 Frequently Tested Legal Concepts 🔹 Detailed Explanations of Practice Questions 🔹 Concept-Based Revision & Accuracy Tips 🔹 Strategies to Avoid Common MCQ Mistakes ⚖️ Practise exam-relevant questions and strengthen your AIBE 22 preparation. Link: https://youtube.c…
What is the punishment prescribed under Section 112 BNS for petty organised crime?
- A. Imprisonment of up to three months only34%
- B. Imprisonment of one to seven years and liability to fine41%
- C. Imprisonment of five years to life in every case19%
- D. Death penalty or life imprisonment only6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the following is specifically covered within the definition of petty organised crime under Section 112 BNS?
- A. Unauthorised selling of tickets45%
- B. Every breach of contract5%
- C. Every accidental injury8%
- D. Lawful trade without a licence where no offence is committed42%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Under Section 111 BNS, what is the minimum imprisonment prescribed for organised crime where the offence does not result in the death of any person?
- A. Three years25%
- B. Five years27%
- C. Seven years28%
- D. Ten years20%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
Under Section 11, how is the question of sexual intent determined?
- A. It is automatically presumed in every case23%
- B. It is a question of fact35%
- C. It depends only on the accused's occupation11%
- D. It is irrelevant when electronic communication is involved31%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
A person threatens to use a real or fabricated depiction of a child involved in a sexual act to threaten or entice the child. Which provision expressly addresses such conduct when its statutory ingredients are met?
- A. Section 57%
- B. Section 712%
- C. Section 1133%
- D. Section 12 only48%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🪔 YOUR DIWALI GIFT IS HERE! ⚖️🎁 Make your Judiciary preparation more affordable with FLAT 50% OFF on ALL RPSC APO BATCHES! ✨ While everyone is celebrating with gifts and festivities, here's a special Diwali gift for all Judiciary aspirants. � 🎟 Use Coupon Code: DIWALI50 🎉 Enroll now and save big! 📞 Enquiries: 76655 64455 Explore Batches: 🔗 https://www.lawpreptutorial.com/apo-online-coaching/rpsc-mains 🔗 https://w…
▶️ WATCH NOW | LAW PREP JUDICIARY ⚖️ 📚 Complete Ban or Green Crackers? | Supreme Court's Diwali 2026 Decision Explained | With Venugopal Sir 🎯 IN THIS VIDEO: 🔹 Supreme Court's Decision on Firecrackers 🔹 Are Green Crackers Allowed During Diwali 2026? 🔹 Restrictions, Conditions & Permitted Timings 🔹 Legal Position on Firecracker Bans 🔹 Pollution Control & Key Legal Implications ⚖️ Understand the latest Supreme Court …
🪔 YOUR DIWALI GIFT IS HERE! ⚖️🎁 This festive season, make your Judiciary preparation more affordable with Law Prep Judiciary! ✨ Get a FLAT 50% OFF on ALL RPSC APO BATCHES and take another step towards your Judiciary goals. 🎟 Use Coupon Code: DIWALI50 🎉 Enroll Now & Save Big! Don’t miss this special Diwali offer. 📞 For enquiries and enrolment: 76655 64455 Link of Batches: https://www.lawpreptutorial.com/test-serie…
Showing the 12 most recent of 570 posts we hold for @LawPrepJudiciary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @LawPrepJudiciary as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 October 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 7 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 40 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 2
Polls
The 6 most recent of 286 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What is the punishment prescribed under Section 112 BNS for petty organised crime?
- A. Imprisonment of up to three months only34%
- B. Imprisonment of one to seven years and liability to fine41%
- C. Imprisonment of five years to life in every case19%
- D. Death penalty or life imprisonment only6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the following is specifically covered within the definition of petty organised crime under Section 112 BNS?
- A. Unauthorised selling of tickets45%
- B. Every breach of contract5%
- C. Every accidental injury8%
- D. Lawful trade without a licence where no offence is committed42%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Under Section 111 BNS, what is the minimum imprisonment prescribed for organised crime where the offence does not result in the death of any person?
- A. Three years25%
- B. Five years27%
- C. Seven years28%
- D. Ten years20%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Under Section 11, how is the question of sexual intent determined?
- A. It is automatically presumed in every case23%
- B. It is a question of fact35%
- C. It depends only on the accused's occupation11%
- D. It is irrelevant when electronic communication is involved31%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
A person threatens to use a real or fabricated depiction of a child involved in a sexual act to threaten or entice the child. Which provision expressly addresses such conduct when its statutory ingredients are met?
- A. Section 57%
- B. Section 712%
- C. Section 1133%
- D. Section 12 only48%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Is every instance of sexting automatically an offence of sexual harassment under the POCSO Act?
- A. Yes, regardless of the circumstances21%
- B. No, the statutory ingredients of the relevant provision must be established60%
- C. Yes, whenever a message is sent electronically13%
- D. No electronic communication can fall under POCSO7%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 570 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@pwlawwallah · 86,340#1
@CurrentLegalGK · 19,151#2
@LC_now · 6,751#3
@JudiciaryGold · 33,423#4
@JudiciaryWorld · 14,769#5
@SuperCoachingJudiciaryByTestbook · 17,498#6
@Judge_book · 10,163#7
@ReviveHigherJudiciaryADJ · 2,562#8
@theshubhamsir · 29,633#9
@livelawindia · 38,688#10
@IndianLawBooks · 26,877#11
@ALEC_for_Judiciary · 17,470#12
@targetpcsj · 3,907#13
@LegalEdge · 47,692#14
@judiciary_iq · 4,626#15
@lawpreptutorial · 42,824#16
@AoneJa · 3,768#17
@jkils · 3,282#18
@lawversityindia · 11,896#19
@punjabjudiciaryprep · 3,782#20
@Thesandeepkhatri · 3,460#21
@judiciary_quiz · 3,449#22
@OurAimOurDreamPCSJ · 13,214#23
@barrister_babu97 · 1,114#24
@Ambitionlawinstitute · 7,580#25
@ilwlawnotes · 7,909#26
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation · 32,649#27
@onlineLLB · 749#28
@JudiciaryLawExams · 7,566#29
@UK_Judiciary_Preparation · 2,692#30
@livelawhindi · 6,853#31
@Punjab_Judiciary · 2,571#32
@utkarshlawclasses · 10,619#33
@studygowithzeenat · 11,774#34
@lawshala · 9,542#35
@Delhi_UPSC_Students · 11,064#36
@Judiciary_Mapping · 2,080#37
@Yojana_Kurukshetra_Magazines · 26,763#38
@MuskanMandhyanOfficial · 6,057#39
@legalpathshala · 11,164#40
@DeFactoJudiciary · 2,617#41
@Law_Students_Zone · 7,600#42
@pcsj2k21 · 1,352#43
@legal_wings_by_pratibha · 2,225#44
@singhallawpublication · 2,422#45
@LAW_Previous_Year_Papers · 4,168#46
@TheBareAct · 11,437#47
@lawNoteshindipdf · 7,357#48
@upsc_law_optional_videos_pdfs_4 · 1,639#49
@ENG_MCQQ · 41,556#50
@lawwithVishal · 4,756#51
@shrimeesrivastava · 14,126#52
@learnwithsapnaa · 5,330#53
@wiutlawsociety · 1,780#54
@labourlawsinstitute · 4,959#55
@ManupatraChannel7 · 6,792#56
@PPSCLaw · 795#57
@law_judiciary_optional_videos_ej · 6,736#58
@stuff_forclat · 4,657#59
@leginf · 10,991#60
@Legal_edge_mock · 15,346#61
@SSC_English_Grammar_Quiz · 202,280#62
@Legalentityjudicialservice · 2,818#63
@pyqjudiciary · 7,082#64
@beautyandflow · 1,206#65
@kvng_uzi · 2,757#66
@tgtpgtgs · 615#67
@ethiodipirstudiesbooksreferences · 5,023#68
@business_magazines · 17,093#69
@medscape24 · 2,901#70
@JudicialWatch · 7,542#71
@booksonphilosophy · 8,467#72
@symptomaticjouissance · 3,250#73
@politicalsciencebooks1 · 14,575#74
@Lawedify · 5,593#75
@oraclesqlplsql · 5,774#76
@cheetatrader · 687#77
@legalknowledge2 · 3,518#78
@wishicouldsayit · 3,298#79
@thenewindianexpress · 21,009#80
@wayofpsychology · 8,729#81
@neropsychtel · 8,185#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@pwlawwallah · 86,340
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 August 2026
@JudiciaryGold · 33,423
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 4 September 2026
@theshubhamsir · 29,633
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
@CurrentLegalGK · 19,151
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 3 October 2026
@IndianLawBooks · 26,877
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 September 2026
@judiciary358 · 21,155
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 23 September 2026
@ENG_MCQQ · 41,556
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
@lawpreptutorial · 42,824
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
@LegalEdge · 47,692
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 27 August 2026
@Indian_Judiciary_Preparation · 32,649
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 4 September 2026
@SSC_English_Grammar_Quiz · 202,280
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Law Prep | Judiciary Preparation” (@LawPrepJudiciary), 23,878 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LawPrepJudiciary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.