Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
50 measurements spanning 86 days, net -145. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,854–12,069 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 50
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 19:31
11,879
-6
6 Nov 2026, 18:48
11,885
-5
5 Nov 2026, 15:36
11,890
-2
4 Nov 2026, 15:11
11,892
-4
3 Nov 2026, 16:46
11,896
-2
2 Nov 2026, 19:49
11,898
-1
31 Oct 2026, 18:29
11,899
-3
30 Oct 2026, 16:06
11,902
-8
29 Oct 2026, 17:06
11,910
-5
28 Oct 2026, 15:38
11,915
-5
27 Oct 2026, 16:08
11,920
-8
26 Oct 2026, 14:44
11,928
-1
25 Oct 2026, 14:18
11,929
-2
24 Oct 2026, 17:36
11,931
+4
23 Oct 2026, 19:06
11,927
-4
22 Oct 2026, 15:58
11,931
+4
21 Oct 2026, 08:01
11,927
-3
19 Oct 2026, 03:48
11,930
+1
18 Oct 2026, 01:37
11,929
-3
15 Oct 2026, 23:28
11,932
first reading
Engagement
147 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.07%
avg views ÷ 11,879 subscribers
Avg views / post
602
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.086%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 147 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 October 2026
Posts held
147 (9 August 2026 – 15 October 2026)
Views total
10,236
Reactions total
1
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 20:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
375
Videos
5
Links
547
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
18 reactions across 15 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
18
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 147 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 147 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 15 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Unless a higher number is permitted through the prescribed process, the maximum number of directors is:
A. 1030%
B. 1216%
C. 1540%
D. 2030%
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Explore the role of electronic evidence and digital forensics in modern trial advocacy! Join our expert-led workshop with LAWVERSITY faculty to learn how to collect, authenticate, and challenge digital evidence in court. Gain insights into admissibility laws, chain of custody, forensic investigation methods, digital tampering, deepfakes, and the importance of expert testimony in strengthening legal arguments.
🗓️ 19t…
Learn how to draft and negotiate technology, SaaS, and AI-related contracts that safeguard your clients in an evolving digital landscape. Join our expert-led workshop with LAWVERSITY faculty to explore SaaS terms and SLAs, liability and indemnities, data protection and compliance, AI-specific clauses, and the legal aspects of e-contracts and e-signatures.
🗓️ 16th October 2026 | ⏰ 7:00 PM IST
💻 Online Workshop | 🔗 K…
The tribunal’s power to determine the admissibility, relevance and weight of evidence arises under:
A. Section 1936%
B. Section 3431%
C. Section 3626%
D. Section 4833%
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
We’re LIVE NOW!
Join today’s workshop on Technology Due Diligence in M&A.
Gain practical insights into evaluating technology assets, identifying tech-related risks, strengthening deal protections, and understanding closing conditions for successful mergers and acquisitions.
We’re going LIVE in just 30 minutes!
Get ready to explore how technology due diligence shapes mergers and acquisitions, from evaluating tech assets to identifying risks and securing stronger deal terms.
🎓 Certificates are also included!
The class link is here!
Get ready for today’s expert-led workshop on Technology Due Diligence in M&A.
Understand how to evaluate technology assets, identify potential risks, assess asset value, and strengthen deal protections during M&A transactions.
⏰ The session begins at 7:00 PM.
Class Link:
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84242935654?pwd=s6V6fQeEyfnh2kGJTkm6JIo0Mb1yn9.1
Don’t miss today’s workshop on Technology Due Diligence in M&A at 7:00 PM!
Discover how technology-related risks are identified during mergers and acquisitions, how tech assets are evaluated, and why deal protections and closing conditions are essential for successful transactions.
📢 Today’s Workshop | Technology Due Diligence in M&A
Explore the role of technology due diligence in mergers and acquisitions and understand how evaluating tech assets can help identify potential risks before a deal is finalised.
Learn about technology asset valuation, risk assessment, deal protections, and closing conditions to better understand the complexities of M&A transactions.
🗓️ Today | ⏰ 7:00 PM
💻 Live O…
Explore the role of technology due diligence in mergers and acquisitions, focusing on evaluating tech assets and managing potential risks. Join our expert-led workshop with LAWVERSITY faculty to learn how to assess asset value, identify technology-related risks, strengthen deal protections, and understand closing conditions for successful M&A transactions.
🗓️ 12th October 2026 | ⏰ 7:00 PM IST
💻 Online Workshop – 🔗 …
Understand the key aspects of M&A due diligence when dealing with technology assets. Join our expert-led workshop with LAWVERSITY faculty to explore how to identify tech risks, assess the value of technology assets, structure deal protections, and navigate closing conditions for stronger and more secure transactions.
🗓️ 12th October 2026 | ⏰ 7:00 PM IST
💻 Online Workshop – 🔗 Know More! 👇🏻
https://lawversity.in/work
Showing the 12 most recent of 147 posts we hold for @lawversityindia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 11 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Unless a higher number is permitted through the prescribed process, the maximum number of directors is:
A. 1030%
B. 1216%
C. 1540%
D. 2030%
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The tribunal’s power to determine the admissibility, relevance and weight of evidence arises under:
A. Section 1936%
B. Section 3431%
C. Section 3626%
D. Section 4833%
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
A. Circumstances give rise to justifiable doubts about independence or impartiality83%
B. One party simply dislikes the arbitrator’s questions8%
C. The arbitrator asks parties to file evidence6%
D. A hearing is scheduled11%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
A. Free, specific, informed, unconditional and unambiguous93%
B. Presumed from silence in every case7%
C. Obtained only orally0%
D. Irrevocable once given0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 147 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 15 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Supreme court+ High court judgement @upsc_judiciary_judegment · 21,761 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 September 2026
indianlawbooks @IndianLawBooks · 1 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 September 2026
LAW Notes Llb Notes Judiciary Notes @LAW_Notes_Llb_Notes · 22,457 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 20 September 2026
𝐋𝐄𝐆𝐀𝐋 𝐂𝐔𝐑𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐓 𝐀𝐅𝐅𝐀𝐈𝐑𝐒 𝐁𝐘 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐔𝐑𝐀𝐋 𝐉𝐔𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐂𝐄 @CurrentLegalGK · 19,137 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 3 October 2026
Live Law @livelawindia · 38,660 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 31 August 2026
Law Prep | Judiciary Preparation @LawPrepJudiciary · 23,894 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 September 2026
LawBhoomi @lawbhoomi · 21,556 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 22 September 2026
Judiciary Gold @JudiciaryGold · 33,419 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 4 September 2026
PW Law Wallah JUDICIARY @pwlawwallah · 86,376 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 August 2026
Indian Judiciary Preparation PCS J @Indian_Judiciary_Preparation · 32,588 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 4 September 2026
Kokanvastu @kokanvastu_official · 21,150 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 23 September 2026
English Lovers @EnglishLoversofficial · 130,808 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LAWversity” (@lawversityindia), 11,879 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lawversityindia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.