Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for JUDICIARY IQ

Channel

JUDICIARY IQ

@judiciary_iq

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,689subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001706132711
TypeChannel
Username@judiciary_iq
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/judiciary_iq

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,6884,7074,697.518 August 2026 — 4,701 subscribers18 August 2026 — 4,702 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,701 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,707 subscribers28 August 2026 — 4,704 subscribers31 August 2026 — 4,700 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,699 subscribers8 September 2026 — 4,696 subscribers12 September 2026 — 4,688 subscribers15 September 2026 — 4,689 subscribers4,68918 August 202615 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 28 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,685–4,710 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 12:594,689+1
12 Sept 2026, 07:404,688-8
8 Sept 2026, 09:354,696-3
2 Sept 2026, 21:114,699-1
31 Aug 2026, 00:544,700-4
28 Aug 2026, 05:234,704-3
24 Aug 2026, 20:354,707+6
21 Aug 2026, 09:364,701-1
18 Aug 2026, 18:524,702+1
18 Aug 2026, 12:304,701first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTC112 viewsread 18 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/s0t3Gkg1NmQ?si=qtzZxc-KxFxFXQNm

17 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC112 viewsread 18 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/tUd_7WB9t5o?si=geleGE4XoiKAB50r

16 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC124 viewsread 18 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/TZv_Clo0b4k?si=Gr1MLNkHXOjbL73h

16 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC128 viewsread 18 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/g_gx8QKDsrs?si=rQrCXi57cys2_wOG

16 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC112 viewsread 18 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/IKsrvsahSfQ?si=IXLjrltLk-9Aj_GY

15 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC124 viewsread 18 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/UxhQH3lhDnk?si=4_xKtAEQeCOSV38o

15 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC123 viewsread 18 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/fDpXjqkVIPQ?si=4saQHq92hrUuKwkd

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @judiciary_iq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Law Prep | Judiciary Preparation
@LawPrepJudiciary · 23,837
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 September 2026
LAW Notes Llb Notes Judiciary Notes
@LAW_Notes_Llb_Notes · 22,571
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 20 September 2026
PW Law Wallah JUDICIARY
@pwlawwallah · 84,878
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 August 2026
Unacademy Live- NTA UGC NET
@ntaugcnett · 31,853
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“JUDICIARY IQ” (@judiciary_iq), 4,689 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/judiciary_iq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.