Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for English From Zero to Hero

Channel

English From Zero to Hero

@Learn_English_from_Zero_to_Hero

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,380subscribers

+360 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001308406364
TypeChannel
Username@Learn_English_from_Zero_to_Hero
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Learn_English_from_Zero_to_Hero

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Learn_English_from_Zero_to_Hero/60945 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC@OneFamilyChannel/145051 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTC1.0072 seconds
@Learn_English_from_Zero_to_Hero/60950 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 22:23 UTC@OneFamilyChannel/145093 Aug 2026, 22:23 UTC1.00under a minute
@Learn_English_from_Zero_to_Hero/60952 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC@OneFamilyChannel/145155 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC1.002 minutes
@Learn_English_from_Zero_to_Hero/60953 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC@OneFamilyChannel/145175 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC1.002 minutes
@Learn_English_from_Zero_to_Hero/60954 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC@OneFamilyChannel/145165 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC1.002 minutes
@Learn_English_from_Zero_to_Hero/60957 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 22:09 UTC@OneFamilyChannel/145195 Aug 2026, 22:09 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@OneFamilyChannel6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutesthis entry (60)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 12 comparable posts for this entry, running 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @Learn_English_from_Zero_to_Hero — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

16,02016,38016,2006 August 2026 — 16,020 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,020 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,026 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,036 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,052 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,059 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,066 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,088 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,096 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,100 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,111 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,115 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,126 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,132 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,130 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,137 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,152 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,168 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,180 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,190 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,205 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,212 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,226 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,229 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,236 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,251 subscribers3 September 2026 — 16,262 subscribers5 September 2026 — 16,269 subscribers8 September 2026 — 16,311 subscribers11 September 2026 — 16,335 subscribers13 September 2026 — 16,347 subscribers15 September 2026 — 16,357 subscribers16 September 2026 — 16,375 subscribers19 September 2026 — 16,380 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net +360. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,966–16,434 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 08:1916,380+5
16 Sept 2026, 23:2016,375+18
15 Sept 2026, 01:3616,357+10
13 Sept 2026, 11:5516,347+12
11 Sept 2026, 14:5616,335+24
8 Sept 2026, 21:2216,311+42
5 Sept 2026, 13:3816,269+7
3 Sept 2026, 16:3816,262+11
2 Sept 2026, 10:0916,251+15
1 Sept 2026, 08:1416,236+7
31 Aug 2026, 08:4416,229+3
30 Aug 2026, 06:0516,226+14
29 Aug 2026, 05:1316,212+7
28 Aug 2026, 04:5816,205+15
27 Aug 2026, 04:1716,190+10
26 Aug 2026, 06:0316,180+12
25 Aug 2026, 02:5416,168+16
23 Aug 2026, 15:1816,152+15
22 Aug 2026, 00:5816,137+7
20 Aug 2026, 17:2216,130first reading

Engagement

62 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.65%
avg views ÷ 16,380 subscribers
Avg views / post
434
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 62 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held62 (25 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total5,637
Reactions total23
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

111 reactions across 37 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9888.3%
🤣43.60%
👏32.70%
👍21.80%
🕊21.80%
😁10.901%
🥰10.901%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 20:34 UTC153 viewsread 3 September 2026

⚠️ Best of English Learning Channels 👉 @EnglishLearn --------- 🟥𝘿𝘼𝙄𝙇𝙔 𝙁𝙍𝙀𝙀 𝘾𝙊𝙐𝙍𝙎𝙀𝙎🟥 👉 @Udacity_Skillshare_Coursera_Edx English Proficiency 🧾 👉 @EngSkills WordPress hacks 📬 👉 @wordpresshacks ~ Wonderful Thoughts ❤️‍🔥 👉 @InspiringThoughts 𝗧𝗢𝗘𝗙𝗟 𝗧𝗜𝗣𝗦 & 𝗧𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗞𝗦✅ 👉 @TOEFL_EXERCISES English Speakers 🗣 👉 @English_Speakers ~ Bestselling eBooks 📚 👉 @eBooksThief Love Quotes 💓 👉 @lovequotesvideo Latest News Update 💙 👉

Signed Smart Promotion Bot

1 Sept 2026, 20:34 UTC90 viewsread 2 September 2026

⚠️ Best of English Learning Channels 👉 @EnglishLearn ---------

Signed Smart Promotion Bot (+5k)

31 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC188 viewsread 1 September 2026

⚠️ Best of English Learning Channels 👉 @EnglishLearn --------- 🟥𝘿𝘼𝙄𝙇𝙔 𝙁𝙍𝙀𝙀 𝘾𝙊𝙐𝙍𝙎𝙀𝙎🟥 👉 @Udacity_Skillshare_Coursera_Edx English Proficiency 🧾 👉 @EngSkills WordPress hacks 📬 👉 @wordpresshacks ~ Wonderful Thoughts ❤️‍🔥 👉 @InspiringThoughts 𝗧𝗢𝗘𝗙𝗟 𝗧𝗜𝗣𝗦 & 𝗧𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗞𝗦✅ 👉 @TOEFL_EXERCISES English Speakers 🗣 👉 @English_Speakers ~ Bestselling eBooks 📚 👉 @eBooksThief Love Quotes 💓 👉 @lovequotesvideo Latest News Update 💙 👉

Signed Smart Promotion Bot

28 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC205 viewsread 29 August 2026

⚠️ Best of English Learning Channels 👉 @EnglishLearn ---------

Signed Smart Promotion Bot (+5k)

27 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTC950 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

💢 Equable and equitable look similar, but they describe different things. ⚜ Equable Means calm, steady, and even in mood or character. It is often used for a person, manner, or climate. If someone stays composed under pressure, you can call that person equable. 🔰 Ex:- The teacher remained equable even when the class grew noisy. ⚜ Equitable Means fair, just, and reasonable, especially when people are being treated

2

Signed 🅽🅄🆅🄾🅻🄰

27 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC174 viewsread 28 August 2026

⚠️ Best of English Learning Channels 👉 @EnglishLearn --------- 🟥𝘿𝘼𝙄𝙇𝙔 𝙁𝙍𝙀𝙀 𝘾𝙊𝙐𝙍𝙎𝙀𝙎🟥 👉 @Udacity_Skillshare_Coursera_Edx English Proficiency 🧾 👉 @EngSkills WordPress hacks 📬 👉 @wordpresshacks ~ Wonderful Thoughts ❤️‍🔥 👉 @InspiringThoughts 𝗧𝗢𝗘𝗙𝗟 𝗧𝗜𝗣𝗦 & 𝗧𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗞𝗦✅ 👉 @TOEFL_EXERCISES English Speakers 🗣 👉 @English_Speakers ~ Bestselling eBooks 📚 👉 @eBooksThief Love Quotes 💓 👉 @lovequotesvideo Latest News Update 💙 👉

Signed Smart Promotion Bot

26 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC197 viewsread 27 August 2026

⚠️ Best of English Learning Channels 👉 @EnglishLearn ---------

Signed Smart Promotion Bot (+5k)

26 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC805 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026

#SpokenEngling #usefuIlanguage ⚜That does it ☆Used to express annoyance or frustration or announce that one has reached the limit of one's patience or temper. ◇That does it! I'm not waiting here any longer. I'll come back tomorrow instead. ⚜Just so you know ☆used to introduce information that the speaker believes may be useful or relevant to the listener. It often conveys a sense of sharing something important

3

Signed PURE <F.M>

25 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC180 viewsread 26 August 2026

⚠️ Best of English Learning Channels 👉 @EnglishLearn --------- 🟥𝘿𝘼𝙄𝙇𝙔 𝙁𝙍𝙀𝙀 𝘾𝙊𝙐𝙍𝙎𝙀𝙎🟥 👉 @Udacity_Skillshare_Coursera_Edx English Proficiency 🧾 👉 @EngSkills WordPress hacks 📬 👉 @wordpresshacks ~ Wonderful Thoughts ❤️‍🔥 👉 @InspiringThoughts 𝗧𝗢𝗘𝗙𝗟 𝗧𝗜𝗣𝗦 & 𝗧𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗞𝗦✅ 👉 @TOEFL_EXERCISES English Speakers 🗣 👉 @English_Speakers ~ Bestselling eBooks 📚 👉 @eBooksThief Love Quotes 💓 👉 @lovequotesvideo Latest News Update 💙 👉

Signed Smart Promotion Bot

Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @Learn_English_from_Zero_to_Hero. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 12 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTCAnonymous Quiz66 voters

....., we describe the setback as a scheduling issue rather than a failure of planning?

  1. Let me tell you52%
  2. May I suggest48%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTCAnonymous Quiz69 voters

The draft is..... where it needs to be yet, so let's give it another round of revision.

  1. not quite81%
  2. totally19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTCAnonymous Quiz65 voters

....., I don't think the comparison with last year's results is entirely valid.

  1. You're kidding32%
  2. With respect68%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTCAnonymous Quiz53 voters

....., reviewing the wording before we send it to the whole department.

  1. It might be worth75%
  2. It is beyond question25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTCAnonymous Quiz52 voters

I'm sorry, but..... about which version was meant for circulation.

  1. You misunderstood the instructions33%
  2. There seems to have been a misunderstanding67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTCAnonymous Quiz46 voters

....., attend the dinner, as I am already committed to another event that evening.

  1. I'd be delighted to26%
  2. I'm afraid I can't74%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 52 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

English With Natives*
@sirjimmy · 31,540
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 6 September 2026
BBC Learning English
@bbcLEn · 28,882
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 9 September 2026
Spoken English Tips
@grammarenglishclass · 29,616
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
Learn English Idioms Language
@Idiomsland · 169,208
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Improve Your English🌙
@Ingliztiliuzz · 92,482
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 August 2026
English Collocations
@English_Collocations_Adjectives · 38,330
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
English Made Easy
@Englishmade_easy · 52,412
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
English Language
@English_Language_IELTS_TOEFL · 128,310
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
English Phrasal Verbs
@PhrasalCards · 113,112
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
Active English Official
@Activeenglish_Official · 35,567
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 2 September 2026
English Vocabulary | Grammar
@English_vocab_grammar · 64,793
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 25 August 2026
English Language
@englishdaybyday · 54,750
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
Learn English Grammar | Language
@Grammar6 · 126,099
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
English Vocabulary | Vocabularies
@Vocabulix · 130,692
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
Quiz Time
@en_quizzes · 21,634
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 September 2026
English Slang Words Terms
@SlangWords · 80,251
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
ENGLISH FLIPS | HINDI TO ENGLISH LEARNING DAILY USE ENGLISH SENTENCES
@sikhoenglish · 30,278
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
Espresso English
@EspressoEnglish · 38,332
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 31 August 2026
Learn Spoken English Vocabulary
@Learni_Spoken_English_Vocabulary · 225,110
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
American English
@AmEnglish · 50,061
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
Books Mania
@booksmania · 76,799
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 August 2026
English Phrases & Expressions
@English_phrases_Expressions_verb · 47,245
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
English Proverbs and Sayings
@English_Proverbs_Sayings_Quotes · 34,215
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
English With Masters
@EngMasters · 74,796
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“English From Zero to Hero” (@Learn_English_from_Zero_to_Hero), 16,380 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Learn_English_from_Zero_to_Hero.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.