Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 91 days, net +84,895. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,456,286–2,566,649 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 11:06
2,553,915
+1,473
4 Nov 2026, 11:37
2,552,442
+1,207
3 Nov 2026, 14:04
2,551,235
+614
2 Nov 2026, 17:16
2,550,621
+1,588
1 Nov 2026, 17:58
2,549,033
+1,378
31 Oct 2026, 15:36
2,547,655
+2,192
30 Oct 2026, 13:00
2,545,463
+918
29 Oct 2026, 15:41
2,544,545
+1,159
28 Oct 2026, 17:20
2,543,386
+1,275
27 Oct 2026, 15:49
2,542,111
+1,552
26 Oct 2026, 14:04
2,540,559
+1,044
25 Oct 2026, 13:26
2,539,515
+1,295
24 Oct 2026, 12:46
2,538,220
+755
23 Oct 2026, 09:36
2,537,465
+1,403
22 Oct 2026, 06:36
2,536,062
+1,353
20 Oct 2026, 22:57
2,534,709
+1,310
19 Oct 2026, 23:29
2,533,399
+1,137
19 Oct 2026, 02:18
2,532,262
+1,285
17 Oct 2026, 23:15
2,530,977
+1,548
17 Oct 2026, 00:56
2,529,429
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 21 August 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2,158 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
4 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
346,718 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
245,510
70.8%
👍
58,070
16.7%
😍
12,319
3.55%
👨💻
11,337
3.27%
🔥
9,292
2.68%
👀
7,250
2.09%
🎄
2,940
0.848%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 346,718 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2023 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17,066
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 20 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
3,360
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Leomatchglobal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 August 2023 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Not getting enough matches? 👀
With Premium on Leomatchbot, your profile gets seen first — right where it matters ✨
More visibility → more likes ❤️ → more matches 💫
No tricks — just more attention on your profile
⭐️ Activate Premium:
👉 t.me/leomatchbot?start=premium
Introducing @leomatchsafety
We’ve created a dedicated Trust & Safety channel for @leomatchbot.
It will be a permanent place where we explain how our approach to user safety works — including age-based protections, moderation, reporting, verification, fraud prevention, privacy, and the continued development of our safety systems.
We’ll also use the channel to share meaningful updates as these systems evolve.
Follo…
Telegram turns 13 today 🎂
And for many years, we’ve been helping people find each other right here on Telegram ❤️
Thank you, Telegram, for building the platform where millions of matches, friendships, and stories have begun.
Happy Birthday, Telegram! 🎉
1️⃣3️⃣ Telegram turns 13 today.
For over half that time — 7,5 years — it's been one of the 10 most downloaded mobile apps in the world.
A whole generation has grown up with it 💪
🎂 Happy birthday, Telegram!
How to avoid getting banned in @leomatchbot:
📸 Your profile must have your real photo, not memes, pets, or random images.
🙂 Make sure your face is clearly visible in at least one picture.
🔍 If verification appears, complete it honestly — don’t try to fake it.
🚫 No photos of other people or anything that’s not you.
🎂 Enter your real age and gender.
⚠️ Strictly prohibited:
• Adults attempting to meet teenagers.
• Tee…
✨ It’s just January 1st.
No plans.
No rush.
Just people here today.
Some start conversations.
Some reply.
You can be one of them.
Open 👉 @leomatchbot
See who’s here.
How to avoid getting banned in @leomatchbot:
📸 Your profile must have your real photo, not memes, pets, or random images.
🙂 Make sure your face is clearly visible in at least one picture.
🔍 If verification appears, complete it honestly — don’t try to fake it.
🚫 No photos of other people or anything that’s not you.
🎂 Enter your real age and gender.
🤝 Communicate respectfully — no swearing, no hate, no insults.
❤️
See who already liked you 👉 @leomatchbot
⚡️ Last night Telegram had some issues, so our bot was a bit quiet.
But now everything’s fine — time to jump back in!
👉 @leomatchbot
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Leomatchglobal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@Leomatchglobal edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Leo - Match & Meet new friends” (@Leomatchglobal), 2,553,915 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Leomatchglobal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.