Channel
@leomatchsafety
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11,150subscribers
+9,041 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1003839235727 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @leomatchsafety |
| Created | 17 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/leomatchsafety |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 11,150 | +189 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:39 | 10,961 | +382 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 10,579 | +396 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 10,183 | +838 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 9,345 | +1,298 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:29 | 8,047 | +739 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 7,308 | +1,610 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 5,698 | +682 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 5,016 | +823 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 4,193 | +1,473 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 2,720 | +611 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 2,109 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 17 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Leomatch Trust & Safety pinned «About Safety at Leomatch This is the official safety and trust channel for @leomatchbot. Online safety cannot be achieved through a single feature. It requires multiple layers of protection, continuous improvement, responsible use of technology, and cooperation…»
Protecting Younger Users on Leomatch Protecting younger users is one of our highest safety priorities. No single measure can address every potential risk. For this reason, @leomatchbot uses multiple layers of protection. These include age-based segmentation, moderation, user reports, automated and AI-assisted safety systems, additional verification and account restrictions. Age declaration and segmentation Users…
Age Safety on Leomatch Age is an important part of how safety works on @leomatchbot. Users are required to declare their age when creating a profile. The declared age is used to determine the age-based segmentation, protections and restrictions that apply to the account. Age-based segmentation Leomatch does not treat all users as part of one unrestricted audience. Users are segmented based on their declared age…
Our Safety Principles Our approach to safety at @leomatchbot is based on a few simple principles. Protection should be layered No single feature can address every safety risk. We combine age-based protections, moderation, user reports, verification, automated and AI-assisted systems, and account restrictions. Younger users require additional protection Protecting younger users is one of our highest safety prior…
About Safety at Leomatch This is the official safety and trust channel for @leomatchbot. Online safety cannot be achieved through a single feature. It requires multiple layers of protection, continuous improvement, responsible use of technology, and cooperation between users and the people and systems responsible for keeping the service safe. This channel explains how we approach that responsibility. Here we pub…
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @leomatchsafety. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Leomatch Trust & Safety” (@leomatchsafety), 11,150 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leomatchsafety.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.