10 measurements spanning 25 days, net +243. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,545–8,967 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Aug 2026, 15:08
8,880
+125
28 Aug 2026, 13:05
8,755
-13
25 Aug 2026, 20:34
8,768
-150
22 Aug 2026, 21:13
8,918
+142
19 Aug 2026, 16:58
8,776
+182
16 Aug 2026, 17:56
8,594
-93
13 Aug 2026, 08:58
8,687
-102
10 Aug 2026, 08:17
8,789
+156
7 Aug 2026, 06:02
8,633
-4
6 Aug 2026, 20:31
8,637
first reading
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.6%
avg views ÷ 8,880 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,390
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
39 (13 July 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
29,154
Reactions total
1,221
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 29s
Average length
1m 45s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,211 reactions across 38 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,193
54.0%
🔥
511
23.1%
👍
282
12.8%
💯
67
3.03%
❤🔥
60
2.71%
👏
47
2.13%
🤩
10
0.452%
🥰
9
0.407%
👌
8
0.362%
🙏
7
0.317%
💘
5
0.226%
😁
3
0.136%
😍
3
0.136%
🤔
3
0.136%
🦄
2
0.09%
🤮
1
0.045%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,211 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мегаидея, родившаяся в Барселоне за бокалом вина, реализована!
А придумала я вот что: попросить подруг вспомнить и прислать наши совместные истории. Те самые, которые обычно начинаются со слов:
«А помнишь?..»
Литературный дар не требовался - достаточно было сюжетной линии. А дальше воспоминания превращались в рассказы.
И это был такой кайф!
Смеяться, вспоминать забытые подробности, снова проживать наши приключени…
На Играх в Сочи 2014 у нас было негласное правило 95/5: 5% решений принимает штаб, а 95% - руководители объектов.
Звучит как прекрасная управленческая модель, и она действительно работала. Но чтобы руководители были способны принимать эти 95% решений самостоятельно, мы учили их этому целый год на специальной программе, практически наравне с подготовкой самой Олимпиады.
Принятие решений, особенно в условиях неопреде…
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Когда-то в ТНК-BP мне подарили этот танк в цветочках как метафору меня:-), и конечно, я его бережно храню.
С одной стороны когда ты танк, то идешь вперед с верой в победу, не боишься препятствий и помнишь, что ты вообще-то вездеход :)
А вот цветочки….мягкость , спокойствие, чувства, ощущение, нежность и красота.
Но все есть лекарство, и всё есть яд, вопрос в дозировке -насколько ты танк и насколько цветочек и …
Сходили на очень приятную, интересную и жизнерадостную выставку «Цветы» в Третьяковку. Как по-разному художники пишут одни и те же цветы, например, цветущую яблоню. У одного она воздушная и почти прозрачная, у другого яркая, залитая солнцем, у третьего — густая, тёмная, немного тревожная.
И нам не приходит в голову выяснять, кто из них увидел яблоню правильно.
Но почему-то в жизни мы постоянно этим занимаемся.
Ка…
😴 Спящий самурай и культ переработки
В Токио можно увидеть странную сцену: офисный клерк спит на скамейке возле небоскрёба, а прохожие обходят его так, словно он памятник. Никто не тронет, не засмеёт и уж точно не ограбит. Потому что перед ними - инэмури: древнее японское право задремать там, где устал
🇯🇵 В Японии сон в офисе или метро - это не лень, а медаль за трудолюбие. Если сотрудник уснул за компьютером, это …
Я всегда на лекциях говорю о том, что человек -и функция в организации, и личность, человек! Но бизнес и человечность почему-то до сих пор иногда противопоставляют.
Как будто бизнес - это место, где нет пространства для эмоций, горя, болезни, семьи и вообще обычной человеческой жизни. Есть график, процессы, цели и KPI, а все остальное должно происходить строго в свободное время.
История с петербургским магазином «…
#естьнадчемподумать
Прочитала интервью «Не бойтесь лени, она помогает думать» с историком искусства Викторией Марковой.
В моей семье лень всегда порицалась: «делу -время, потехе -час». Поэтому мысль о том, что лень может быть не недостатком, а необходимой паузой, особенно зацепила.
У Марковой прекрасно сказано: «Не бойтесь лени, она помогает думать».
Наверное, есть лень от безразличия, а есть другая лень, созерц…
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔥17
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @MPochinok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Получается ли у вас по-настоящему снижать нагрузку ? Или темп все равно берет свое?
Да29%
Нет35%
В процессе27%
Даже не пытаюсь9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Skolkovo School of Management @skolkovo_channel · 43,164 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Люди и изменения - Марина Починок:” (@MPochinok), 8,880 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MPochinok.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
