❌ 乌龙工作室展示了 iOS 17.3.1 越狱录屏回复质疑 基于原版 Dopamine 越狱, 这可能是第一个完全由 AI 构建的越狱工具——0 行源代码是由人类编写的。使用 Sol 和 K3 制作。 👻 opa334 道歉并感叹 AI 如此强大 看来只要有漏洞,用 AI 完成越狱不是难事😇
❤4

Channel
@MRHXPJGG
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,986subscribers
-85 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001105395908 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MRHXPJGG |
| Created | 21 October 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MRHXPJGG |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 9,986 | -6 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 9,992 | -10 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 10,002 | -6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 10,008 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:03 | 10,009 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:13 | 10,011 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 10,017 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 10,020 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 10,023 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 10,025 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 10,028 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 10,029 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:57 | 10,030 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 10,028 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 10,032 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 10,038 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:05 | 10,036 | -4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 10,040 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:05 | 10,043 | -7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 10,050 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 31 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
135 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 36 | 26.7% | |
| 🤣 | 34 | 25.2% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 16.3% | |
| 🥰 | 16 | 11.9% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 7.41% | |
| 💩 | 6 | 4.44% | |
| 🤡 | 5 | 3.70% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 2.22% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.48% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.741% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2025 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❌ 乌龙工作室展示了 iOS 17.3.1 越狱录屏回复质疑 基于原版 Dopamine 越狱, 这可能是第一个完全由 AI 构建的越狱工具——0 行源代码是由人类编写的。使用 Sol 和 K3 制作。 👻 opa334 道歉并感叹 AI 如此强大 看来只要有漏洞,用 AI 完成越狱不是难事😇
❤4
各位五一快乐!
👍10
https://youtu.be/HrUNXofYAfY?si=ndIWoWeqf4MY9ZwV
❤1
佛山无影狗
❤1
艺术已成 papi酱《我想象中的春晚导演》
❤2👏1💩1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
除夕平安,祝您新年快乐!骐骥驰骋!
❤1
平安夜🍎
❤2
挑战新法(bu shi)
❤1
2026年1月1日起,新修订的《中华人民共和国治安管理处罚法》(以下简称《治安管理处罚法》)将正式施行,其中第八十条对传播淫秽信息的处罚规定作出明确细化,对传播淫秽信息加大了处罚力度。 记者梳理了广东地区审理的多起涉网络淫秽信息传播案件,深入解读新法司法实践导向,网络涉黄无论牟利与否、场景公私,均无法律真空,新规落地将进一步填补规制空白,筑牢清朗网络环境法治防线。 微信转发淫秽信息给好友也违法,QQ群主放任成员传播“色情”也获刑 从广东地区查处的涉网络淫秽信息案件来看,传播行为的表现形式日趋多样,从传统的群内分享、私聊发送,到专业化的众筹合购、网站传播、直播牟利,覆盖了行政违法、刑事犯罪,清晰呈现了不同行为模式对应的法律后果。 以往公众存在的“私下传播淫秽信息仅属道德问题”的认知误区,新规修订明确纠正这一认知。 新《治安管理处罚法》第八十条明确将“利用信息网络、电话以及其他通讯工具传播淫秽信息”纳入治安处罚范畴,无论传播…
💩5😁5❤1
国庆快乐!
🥰5❤3
Video, posted without a caption
❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @MRHXPJGG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TG规则脚本信息分享器” (@MRHXPJGG), 9,986 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MRHXPJGG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.