Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for معهد العصيمي| "Институт "Аль-Усайми

Channel

معهد العصيمي| "Институт "Аль-Усайми

@Ma1had_Usaimi

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,848subscribers

+148 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001946847706
TypeChannel
Username@Ma1had_Usaimi
Description📍Все об институте: https://t.me/Ma1had_Usaimi/6033?single 📮Наш бот обратной связи: @Proverj_bot ШАРИАТСКИЕ ВОПРОСЫ НЕ ЗАДАВАТЬ! 📃Сертификаты https://t.me/ekzamen_usaimi
Created2 April 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Ma1had_Usaimi

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

16,68516,98016,832.56 August 2026 — 16,700 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,699 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,695 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,691 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,685 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,690 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,695 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,697 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,701 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,711 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,980 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,966 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,956 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,946 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,942 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,933 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,930 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,928 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,926 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,917 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,914 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,905 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,898 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,899 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,903 subscribers4 September 2026 — 16,894 subscribers6 September 2026 — 16,878 subscribers10 September 2026 — 16,863 subscribers12 September 2026 — 16,850 subscribers13 September 2026 — 16,837 subscribers15 September 2026 — 16,823 subscribers17 September 2026 — 16,975 subscribers28 September 2026 — 16,952 subscribers5 October 2026 — 16,968 subscribers9 October 2026 — 16,960 subscribers14 October 2026 — 16,937 subscribers16 October 2026 — 16,935 subscribers16 October 2026 — 16,943 subscribers17 October 2026 — 16,929 subscribers19 October 2026 — 16,925 subscribers20 October 2026 — 16,920 subscribers21 October 2026 — 16,919 subscribers22 October 2026 — 16,916 subscribers24 October 2026 — 16,908 subscribers25 October 2026 — 16,903 subscribers26 October 2026 — 16,901 subscribers27 October 2026 — 16,892 subscribers28 October 2026 — 16,884 subscribers29 October 2026 — 16,878 subscribers30 October 2026 — 16,868 subscribers31 October 2026 — 16,865 subscribers1 November 2026 — 16,866 subscribers2 November 2026 — 16,870 subscribers3 November 2026 — 16,867 subscribers4 November 2026 — 16,863 subscribers5 November 2026 — 16,857 subscribers7 November 2026 — 16,848 subscribers16,8486 August 20267 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 94 days, net +148. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,641–17,024 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 20:5916,848-9
5 Nov 2026, 18:5816,857-6
4 Nov 2026, 19:5016,863-4
3 Nov 2026, 16:0916,867-3
2 Nov 2026, 16:2816,870+4
1 Nov 2026, 13:3816,866+1
31 Oct 2026, 10:4516,865-3
30 Oct 2026, 13:4616,868-10
29 Oct 2026, 10:4516,878-6
28 Oct 2026, 07:2816,884-8
27 Oct 2026, 04:4716,892-9
26 Oct 2026, 05:0616,901-2
25 Oct 2026, 02:1916,903-5
24 Oct 2026, 01:1116,908-8
22 Oct 2026, 23:3616,916-3
21 Oct 2026, 18:3016,919-1
20 Oct 2026, 17:0916,920-5
19 Oct 2026, 15:0016,925-4
17 Oct 2026, 19:0916,929-14
16 Oct 2026, 21:3616,943first reading

Engagement

83 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.06%
avg views ÷ 16,848 subscribers
Avg views / post
684
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
33
of 83 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held83 (29 June 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total22,571
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 16:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈853
Videos
≈147
Links
≈1,160

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 43s
Average length
1m 21s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 33 posts held from the last 30 days (30.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 15:40 UTC291 viewsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @DiroyaPhoto

📜 Почти половина прописи уже готова, по милости Аллаха ✔️ Готовим ее к началу бесплатного курса «Читай». Ученикам она будет доступна в PDF-формате. Можно распечатать и заниматься дополнительно письмом. Начало бесплатного курса 16 ноября! 🖊️ https://t.me/Diroya/12066

6 Nov 2026, 16:03 UTC682 viewsread 8 November 2026
Voice message

💫Двенадцатый зикр, произносимый только утром. Произносится один раз.

6 Nov 2026, 15:59 UTC688 viewsread 8 November 2026

💫Двенадцатый зикр, произносимый только утром. Произносится один раз. 💫Хадис на арабском: عَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ أَبْزَى رضي الله عنه قَالَ: كَانَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ ﷺ إِذَا أَصْبَحَ قَالَ: أَصْبَحْنَا عَلَى فِطْرَةِ الْإِسْلَامِ، وَكَلِمَةِ الْإِخْلَاصِ، وَدِينِ نَبِيِّنَا مُحَمَّدٍ ﷺ، وَمِلَّةِ أَبِينَا إِبْرَاهِيمَ حَنِيفًا مُسْلِمًا، وَمَا أَنَا مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ. От Абдуррахмана ибн Абзы رضي الله عنه о …

6 Nov 2026, 15:59 UTC525 viewsread 8 November 2026
File

📒 «Разъяснение книги "Прекрасное краткое собрание утренних и вечерних поминаний"» шейха Салиха аль-Усайми, да хранит его Аллах. 📒Содержание лекции: Двенадцатый утренний зикр. Для вопросов по урокам: @Proverj_bot 💫https://t.me/Ma1had_Usaimi #Зикр

6 Nov 2026, 11:14 UTC593 viewsread 8 November 2026

Таухид (Единобожие) — основа всех поклонений, основа Ислама. Без него нет Ислама! Это побуждает нас делать наш призыв на основе Единобожия, не боясь порицания людей, в том числе некоторых, не до конца понимающих суть религии проповедников. Чтобы призывать и воспитывать на Единобожии, необязательно читать специальные книги на эту тему. Особенно в некоторых местностях. О Таухиде можно говорить через сиру (жизнеопис…

4 Nov 2026, 16:10 UTC759 viewsread 8 November 2026
Voice message

💫Одиннадцатый зикр, произносимый утром и вечером. Произносится один раз. Вечерняя версия.

4 Nov 2026, 16:10 UTC750 viewsread 8 November 2026
Voice message

💫 Одиннадцатый зикр, произносимый утром и вечером. Произносится один раз. Утренняя версия.

4 Nov 2026, 16:05 UTC757 viewsread 8 November 2026

💫Одиннадцатый зикр, произносимый утром и вечером. Произносится один раз. 💫Хадис на арабском: عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ غَنَّامٍ الْبَيَاضِيِّ رضي الله عنه، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ ﷺ قَالَ: «مَنْ قَالَ حِينَ يُصْبِحُ: اللَّهُمَّ مَا أَصْبَحَ بِي مِنْ نِعْمَةٍفَمِنْكَ، وَحْدَكَ لَا شَرِيكَ لَكَ، فَلَكَ الْحَمْدُ وَلَكَ الشُّكْرُ، فَقَدْ أَدَّى شُكْرَ يَوْمِهِ، وَمَنْ قَالَ مِثْلَ ذَلِكَ حِينَ يُمْسِي فَقَدْ أَدَّى شُكْ…

4 Nov 2026, 16:05 UTC600 viewsread 8 November 2026
File

📒 «Разъяснение книги "Прекрасное краткое собрание утренних и вечерних поминаний"» шейха Салиха аль-Усайми, да хранит его Аллах. 📒Содержание лекции: Одиннадцатый утренний зикр. Для вопросов по урокам: @Proverj_bot 💫https://t.me/Ma1had_Usaimi #Зикр

Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @Ma1had_Usaimi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Ma1had_Usaimi edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
3 November 2026
Most recent edit
3 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 4 posts on @Ma1had_Usaimi as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
24 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
24 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
6 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 6 most recent of 18 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTCAnonymous Quiz192 voters

За что ангелы будут прогонять людей от водоема пророка 📒?

  1. За отказ от празднования дня рождения пророка 📒, ибо это указывает на его принижение3%
  2. За нововведения, из числа которых является празднование дня рождения пророка 📒74%
  3. За их явное неверие23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTCAnonymous Quiz167 voters

На что указывает признание такого понятия, как "хорошее нововведение"?

  1. На глубокое понимание религии12%
  2. На то, что посланник 📒 не донес до нас всю религию и утаил что-то54%
  3. На наличие так же и плохого нововведения, и именно за ним нельзя следовать, а в хорошем только благо34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTCAnonymous Quiz201 voters

Кто из имамов четырех мазхабов побуждал праздновать день рождение пророка 📒?

  1. Все они0%
  2. Имам аш-Шафии и имам Абу Ханифа4%
  3. Никто96%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTCAnonymous Quiz166 voters

Какой хукм по ЕДИНОГЛАСНОМУ МНЕНИЮ, был дан учёными фатымидам?

  1. Они из числа ахлю-сунна7%
  2. Они сектанты, но не вышли из ислама39%
  3. Они неверующие54%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTCAnonymous Quiz172 voters

Кто из учёных, живших во время фатымидов, дозволил праздновать день рождения пророка 📒?

  1. Аль-Кадый Ияд аль-Малики20%
  2. Учёные ханафитского мазхаба8%
  3. Никто72%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTCAnonymous Quiz185 voters

Кто первым начал праздновать день рождения пророка 📒?

  1. Сподвижники1%
  2. Последователи сподвижников5%
  3. Фатымиды (одна из сект рафидитов)94%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Умма «Читай»
@ummah_chitay · 20,986
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 September 2026
AL-FANAR SCHOOL
@fanar_school · 24,866
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 September 2026
Saudia Press © Новости КСА
@SaudiaPress · 20,070
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 September 2026
«Умар Медина»
@MedinaUroki · 25,375
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 October 2026
Институт «Дироя» | معهد الدراية
@Diroya · 49,913
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
Исламские книги PDF
@kniga_pdf · 112,879
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
Абу Ислам аш-Шаркаси
@abu_islam_official · 23,034
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026
VumLife Здоровье женщины и интимная гимнастика
@secretnilfitnes · 20,578
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 September 2026
НОВОСТИ КСА И ОАЭ
@saudiauae · 19,244
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 2 October 2026
النحو المُيَسَّر لخالد عبد العزيز
@khaledabdelazizm · 105,989
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
Шейх Солихь Аль-Усеймин
@al_usemin · 20,684
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 September 2026
Минхадж ас-Сунна
@minhajsunna · 22,450
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 September 2026
𝐓 𝐀 𝐑 𝐈 𝐇/История Ислама
@tarihmedia · 21,184
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 September 2026
Шейх Усман Аль Хамис
@usmankhamys · 57,198
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Zad Academy - برنامج أكاديمية زاد
@Zad_Academy_p · 47,265
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“معهد العصيمي| "Институт "Аль-Усайми” (@Ma1had_Usaimi), 16,848 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ma1had_Usaimi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.