📣📣📣📣 🎁ЗАПУСКАЕМ АКЦИЮ 🖇️Поступи на 7 поток до 16 сентября и получи блокнот студента Дироя🖇️ После оплаты через платформу покажите админу чек и вам оформят подарок🎁 🟢Админ: @zayavka_diroya Акция действует с момента выхода данного поста 🖊️Посмотрите два пробных урока, выберите подходящий вариант обучения и поступите прямо на платформе ⬇️ ☑️Мини-приложение: https://t.me/diroyaapp_bot ☑️Браузерная версия: http://app.…

Channel
معهد العصيمي| "Институт "Аль-Усайми
@Ma1had_Usaimi
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,975subscribers
+275 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001946847706 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ma1had_Usaimi |
| Created | 2 April 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ma1had_Usaimi |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:02 | 16,975 | +152 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 16,823 | -14 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:37 | 16,837 | -13 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 16,850 | -13 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 16,863 | -15 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 16,878 | -16 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 16,894 | -9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:35 | 16,903 | +4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:49 | 16,899 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 16,898 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 16,905 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 16,914 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 16,917 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 16,926 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 16,928 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 16,930 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 16,933 | -9 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:25 | 16,942 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 16,946 | -10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 16,956 | first reading |
Engagement
50 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 50 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 6m 43s
- Average length
- 1m 21s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Открыт приём заявок на седьмой поток Института «Дироя» (первый семестр). ➡️Старт обучения — 14 сентября. После начала занятий приём заявок будет закрыт. ➡️ Перед поступлением рекомендуем ознакомиться с подробной информацией об обучении: https://t.me/Diroya/11043 За три года обучения вы получите базовые знания шариатских наук и сможете выбрать факультет, который вам ближе: Коран, хадисы, акыда, фикх или арабский яз…
Sticker, posted without a caption
📚Открыт прием заявок на новый поток на учебу в институте «Дироя» в Медине! 📅Учеба начнется примерно 10 сентября и будет длиться до конца мая. ✏️Всего около 25 мест. ✉️Для связи: @Medina_Diroya ☎️Файл с подробной информацией прикреплен к посту!
💬Одна из основных причин раскола в наше время - это оставление больших ученых и следование за молодыми. 📝Вот список 10 больших ученых Ахлю сунна валь-Джама’а нашего времени, чьих книг и лекций тебе хватит до конца твоей жизни: ✅Салих аль-Фаузан, Салих аль-Усайми, Абдуль-Мухсин аль-Аббад, Абдуррахман аль-Баррак, Абдуль Азиз ар-Роджихи, Салих Али Шейх, Абдуль-Карим аль-Худейр, Абдурразак аль-Бадр, Салих Синди, Абдус…
Sticker, posted without a caption
За что ангелы будут прогонять людей от водоема пророка 📒?
- За отказ от празднования дня рождения пророка 📒, ибо это указывает на его принижение3%
- За нововведения, из числа которых является празднование дня рождения пророка 📒74%
- За их явное неверие23%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
На что указывает признание такого понятия, как "хорошее нововведение"?
- На глубокое понимание религии12%
- На то, что посланник 📒 не донес до нас всю религию и утаил что-то54%
- На наличие так же и плохого нововведения, и именно за ним нельзя следовать, а в хорошем только благо34%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кто из имамов четырех мазхабов побуждал праздновать день рождение пророка 📒?
- Все они0%
- Имам аш-Шафии и имам Абу Ханифа4%
- Никто96%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кто первым начал праздновать день рождения пророка 📒?
- Сподвижники1%
- Последователи сподвижников5%
- Фатымиды (одна из сект рафидитов)94%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой хукм по ЕДИНОГЛАСНОМУ МНЕНИЮ, был дан учёными фатымидам?
- Они из числа ахлю-сунна7%
- Они сектанты, но не вышли из ислама39%
- Они неверующие54%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кто из учёных, живших во время фатымидов, дозволил праздновать день рождения пророка 📒?
- Аль-Кадый Ияд аль-Малики20%
- Учёные ханафитского мазхаба8%
- Никто72%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @Ma1had_Usaimi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 18 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
За что ангелы будут прогонять людей от водоема пророка 📒?
- За отказ от празднования дня рождения пророка 📒, ибо это указывает на его принижение3%
- За нововведения, из числа которых является празднование дня рождения пророка 📒74%
- За их явное неверие23%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
На что указывает признание такого понятия, как "хорошее нововведение"?
- На глубокое понимание религии12%
- На то, что посланник 📒 не донес до нас всю религию и утаил что-то54%
- На наличие так же и плохого нововведения, и именно за ним нельзя следовать, а в хорошем только благо34%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кто из имамов четырех мазхабов побуждал праздновать день рождение пророка 📒?
- Все они0%
- Имам аш-Шафии и имам Абу Ханифа4%
- Никто96%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой хукм по ЕДИНОГЛАСНОМУ МНЕНИЮ, был дан учёными фатымидам?
- Они из числа ахлю-сунна7%
- Они сектанты, но не вышли из ислама39%
- Они неверующие54%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кто из учёных, живших во время фатымидов, дозволил праздновать день рождения пророка 📒?
- Аль-Кадый Ияд аль-Малики20%
- Учёные ханафитского мазхаба8%
- Никто72%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кто первым начал праздновать день рождения пророка 📒?
- Сподвижники1%
- Последователи сподвижников5%
- Фатымиды (одна из сект рафидитов)94%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 25 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@SalihalUsaimi · 13,6032 postsИздательство «دَارُ المُحَدِّث» | Дар аль-Мухаддис
@dar_al_Muhaddis · 2,3502 posts«Облегчение знаний» 2 курс
@kurs2_Usaimi · 8132 postsИнститут «Дироя» | معهد الدراية
@Diroya · 48,4301 postⲥⲉⲣⲇцⲉ ⲙⲩجⲁⲭυⲇⲁ
@HeartMujahideen · 261 postصمت البرزخ
@al_barzah · 1411 postلا أسم
@la_asm · 81 postКак научиться НАМАЗУ легко
@namazlegko · 1621 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@Diroya · 48,43011 postsУчеба в Медине от «Дироя»
@Diroya_Medina · 1,3722 postsЖенский отдел «Дироя»
@Diroya_for_sisters · 10,9211 postМарказ Ибн Усеймина
@Markaz_Ibn_Useimin · 4,7181 postШкола хафизов «Ривая»
@Riwayah_Hifz · 3,0511 postИсламский магазин "BADR"
@badrmagazin · 6,2521 postТаква kids | арабский для детей
@takwa_kids · 4,7671 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Diroya · 48,4303 posts«Облегчение знаний» 2 курс
@kurs2_Usaimi · 8132 postsКак научиться НАМАЗУ легко
@namazlegko · 1622 postsأهل السنة والجماعة
@ahlusunna10 · 1271 postصمت البرزخ
@al_barzah · 1411 postلا أسم
@la_asm · 81 post«Облегчение знаний» 1 курс (4 поток 2026/27)
@oblegchenie_znanii1 · 1,1461 post«Облегчение знаний» 2 курс (3 поток 2026/27)
@oblegchenie_znanii2 · 2961 post«Облегчение знаний» 3 курс (2 поток 2026/27)
@oblegchenie_znanii3 · 1621 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Diroya · 48,4307 postsЖенский отдел «Дироя»
@Diroya_for_sisters · 10,9211 postМарказ Ибн Усеймина
@Markaz_Ibn_Useimin · 4,7181 postШкола хафизов «Ривая»
@Riwayah_Hifz · 3,0511 postТаква kids | арабский для детей
@takwa_kids · 4,7671 postОтзывы | Таква Kids
@TakwaKids_reviews · 541 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ummah_chitay · 21,399
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 September 2026
@fanar_school · 26,084
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 September 2026
@Diroya · 48,430
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
@kniga_pdf · 112,662
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
@abu_islam_official · 22,866
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026
@khaledabdelazizm · 106,089
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
@minhajsunna · 22,435
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 September 2026
@usmankhamys · 57,362
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
@Zad_Academy_p · 47,799
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“معهد العصيمي| "Институт "Аль-Усайми” (@Ma1had_Usaimi), 16,975 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ma1had_Usaimi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.