📜 Почти половина прописи уже готова, по милости Аллаха ✔️ Готовим ее к началу бесплатного курса «Читай». Ученикам она будет доступна в PDF-формате. Можно распечатать и заниматься дополнительно письмом. Начало бесплатного курса 16 ноября! 🖊️ https://t.me/Diroya/12066

Channel
معهد العصيمي| "Институт "Аль-Усайми
@Ma1had_Usaimi
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,848subscribers
+148 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001946847706 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ma1had_Usaimi |
| Description | 📍Все об институте: https://t.me/Ma1had_Usaimi/6033?single 📮Наш бот обратной связи: @Proverj_bot ШАРИАТСКИЕ ВОПРОСЫ НЕ ЗАДАВАТЬ! 📃Сертификаты https://t.me/ekzamen_usaimi |
| Created | 2 April 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ma1had_Usaimi |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 20:59 | 16,848 | -9 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 18:58 | 16,857 | -6 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 19:50 | 16,863 | -4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:09 | 16,867 | -3 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:28 | 16,870 | +4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:38 | 16,866 | +1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:45 | 16,865 | -3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:46 | 16,868 | -10 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 10:45 | 16,878 | -6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 07:28 | 16,884 | -8 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 04:47 | 16,892 | -9 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:06 | 16,901 | -2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:19 | 16,903 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:11 | 16,908 | -8 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:36 | 16,916 | -3 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 18:30 | 16,919 | -1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 17:09 | 16,920 | -5 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:00 | 16,925 | -4 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:09 | 16,929 | -14 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 21:36 | 16,943 | first reading |
Engagement
83 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.06%
- avg views ÷ 16,848 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 684
- 33 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 33
- of 83 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 83 (29 June 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 22,571 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 16:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈853
- Videos
- ≈147
- Links
- ≈1,160
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 6m 43s
- Average length
- 1m 21s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 33 posts held from the last 30 days (30.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
💫Двенадцатый зикр, произносимый только утром. Произносится один раз.
💫Двенадцатый зикр, произносимый только утром. Произносится один раз. 💫Хадис на арабском: عَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ أَبْزَى رضي الله عنه قَالَ: كَانَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ ﷺ إِذَا أَصْبَحَ قَالَ: أَصْبَحْنَا عَلَى فِطْرَةِ الْإِسْلَامِ، وَكَلِمَةِ الْإِخْلَاصِ، وَدِينِ نَبِيِّنَا مُحَمَّدٍ ﷺ، وَمِلَّةِ أَبِينَا إِبْرَاهِيمَ حَنِيفًا مُسْلِمًا، وَمَا أَنَا مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ. От Абдуррахмана ибн Абзы رضي الله عنه о …
📒 «Разъяснение книги "Прекрасное краткое собрание утренних и вечерних поминаний"» шейха Салиха аль-Усайми, да хранит его Аллах. 📒Содержание лекции: Двенадцатый утренний зикр. Для вопросов по урокам: @Proverj_bot 💫https://t.me/Ma1had_Usaimi #Зикр
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Таухид (Единобожие) — основа всех поклонений, основа Ислама. Без него нет Ислама! Это побуждает нас делать наш призыв на основе Единобожия, не боясь порицания людей, в том числе некоторых, не до конца понимающих суть религии проповедников. Чтобы призывать и воспитывать на Единобожии, необязательно читать специальные книги на эту тему. Особенно в некоторых местностях. О Таухиде можно говорить через сиру (жизнеопис…
Sticker, posted without a caption
💫Одиннадцатый зикр, произносимый утром и вечером. Произносится один раз. Вечерняя версия.
💫 Одиннадцатый зикр, произносимый утром и вечером. Произносится один раз. Утренняя версия.
💫Одиннадцатый зикр, произносимый утром и вечером. Произносится один раз. 💫Хадис на арабском: عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ غَنَّامٍ الْبَيَاضِيِّ رضي الله عنه، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ ﷺ قَالَ: «مَنْ قَالَ حِينَ يُصْبِحُ: اللَّهُمَّ مَا أَصْبَحَ بِي مِنْ نِعْمَةٍفَمِنْكَ، وَحْدَكَ لَا شَرِيكَ لَكَ، فَلَكَ الْحَمْدُ وَلَكَ الشُّكْرُ، فَقَدْ أَدَّى شُكْرَ يَوْمِهِ، وَمَنْ قَالَ مِثْلَ ذَلِكَ حِينَ يُمْسِي فَقَدْ أَدَّى شُكْ…
📒 «Разъяснение книги "Прекрасное краткое собрание утренних и вечерних поминаний"» шейха Салиха аль-Усайми, да хранит его Аллах. 📒Содержание лекции: Одиннадцатый утренний зикр. Для вопросов по урокам: @Proverj_bot 💫https://t.me/Ma1had_Usaimi #Зикр
Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @Ma1had_Usaimi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Ma1had_Usaimi edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 3 November 2026
- Most recent edit
- 3 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @Ma1had_Usaimi as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 24 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 24 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 6 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Polls
The 6 most recent of 18 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
За что ангелы будут прогонять людей от водоема пророка 📒?
- За отказ от празднования дня рождения пророка 📒, ибо это указывает на его принижение3%
- За нововведения, из числа которых является празднование дня рождения пророка 📒74%
- За их явное неверие23%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
На что указывает признание такого понятия, как "хорошее нововведение"?
- На глубокое понимание религии12%
- На то, что посланник 📒 не донес до нас всю религию и утаил что-то54%
- На наличие так же и плохого нововведения, и именно за ним нельзя следовать, а в хорошем только благо34%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кто из имамов четырех мазхабов побуждал праздновать день рождение пророка 📒?
- Все они0%
- Имам аш-Шафии и имам Абу Ханифа4%
- Никто96%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой хукм по ЕДИНОГЛАСНОМУ МНЕНИЮ, был дан учёными фатымидам?
- Они из числа ахлю-сунна7%
- Они сектанты, но не вышли из ислама39%
- Они неверующие54%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кто из учёных, живших во время фатымидов, дозволил праздновать день рождения пророка 📒?
- Аль-Кадый Ияд аль-Малики20%
- Учёные ханафитского мазхаба8%
- Никто72%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кто первым начал праздновать день рождения пророка 📒?
- Сподвижники1%
- Последователи сподвижников5%
- Фатымиды (одна из сект рафидитов)94%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@SalihalUsaimi · 13,5282 postsИздательство «دَارُ المُحَدِّث» | Дар аль-Мухаддис
@dar_al_Muhaddis · 2,2942 posts«Облегчение знаний» 2 курс
@kurs2_Usaimi · 7872 postsИнститут «Дироя» | معهد الدراية
@Diroya · 49,9131 postⲥⲉⲣⲇцⲉ ⲙⲩجⲁⲭυⲇⲁ
@HeartMujahideen · 251 postصمت البرزخ
@al_barzah · 1381 postلا أسم
@la_asm · 71 postКак научиться НАМАЗУ легко
@namazlegko · 1581 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@Diroya · 49,91313 postsУчеба в Медине от «Дироя»
@Diroya_Medina · 1,3182 postsЖенский отдел «Дироя»
@Diroya_for_sisters · 10,9241 postМарказ Ибн Усеймина
@Markaz_Ibn_Useimin · 4,6261 postШкола хафизов «Ривая»
@Riwayah_Hifz · 2,9511 postИсламский магазин "BADR"
@badrmagazin · 6,3371 postТаква kids | арабский для детей
@takwa_kids · 4,6691 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Diroya · 49,9134 posts«Облегчение знаний» 2 курс
@kurs2_Usaimi · 7872 postsКак научиться НАМАЗУ легко
@namazlegko · 1582 postsأهل السنة والجماعة
@ahlusunna10 · 1241 postصمت البرزخ
@al_barzah · 1381 postلا أسم
@la_asm · 71 post«Облегчение знаний» 1 курс (4 поток 2026/27)
@oblegchenie_znanii1 · 1,1291 post«Облегчение знаний» 2 курс (3 поток 2026/27)
@oblegchenie_znanii2 · 3041 post«Облегчение знаний» 3 курс (2 поток 2026/27)
@oblegchenie_znanii3 · 1741 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Diroya · 49,9139 postsЖенский отдел «Дироя»
@Diroya_for_sisters · 10,9241 postМарказ Ибн Усеймина
@Markaz_Ibn_Useimin · 4,6261 postШкола хафизов «Ривая»
@Riwayah_Hifz · 2,9511 postТаква kids | арабский для детей
@takwa_kids · 4,6691 postОтзывы | Таква Kids
@TakwaKids_reviews · 511 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ummah_chitay · 20,986
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 September 2026
@fanar_school · 24,866
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 September 2026
@SaudiaPress · 20,070
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 September 2026
@MedinaUroki · 25,375
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 October 2026
@Diroya · 49,913
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
@kniga_pdf · 112,879
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
@abu_islam_official · 23,034
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026
@secretnilfitnes · 20,578
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 September 2026
@saudiauae · 19,244
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 2 October 2026
@khaledabdelazizm · 105,989
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
@al_usemin · 20,684
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 September 2026
@minhajsunna · 22,450
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 September 2026
@tarihmedia · 21,184
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 September 2026
@usmankhamys · 57,198
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
@Zad_Academy_p · 47,265
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“معهد العصيمي| "Институт "Аль-Усайми” (@Ma1had_Usaimi), 16,848 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ma1had_Usaimi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.