Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
56 measurements spanning 94 days, net +114. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,299–22,499 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 02:10
22,450
+19
6 Nov 2026, 20:17
22,431
+4
5 Nov 2026, 16:50
22,427
+22
4 Nov 2026, 13:35
22,405
-1
3 Nov 2026, 10:18
22,406
-1
2 Nov 2026, 11:14
22,407
-2
1 Nov 2026, 13:10
22,409
+5
31 Oct 2026, 10:07
22,404
-13
30 Oct 2026, 08:48
22,417
-1
29 Oct 2026, 08:00
22,418
+4
28 Oct 2026, 03:57
22,414
-1
27 Oct 2026, 04:00
22,415
+3
26 Oct 2026, 02:10
22,412
-9
25 Oct 2026, 00:27
22,421
-7
24 Oct 2026, 02:09
22,428
-5
23 Oct 2026, 04:55
22,433
-1
22 Oct 2026, 06:56
22,434
-13
21 Oct 2026, 02:35
22,447
-10
20 Oct 2026, 00:58
22,457
-3
19 Oct 2026, 00:29
22,460
first reading
Engagement
175 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.2%
avg views ÷ 22,450 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,740
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
43
of 175 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
175 (24 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
117,710
Reactions total
1,686
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 14:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈984
Videos
≈829
Links
≈1,680
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
11h 18m
Average length
8m 05s
Measured directly from 84 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,191 reactions across 169 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
3,879
53.9%
🔥
1,746
24.3%
💯
1,223
17.0%
✍
343
4.77%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 172 of the 175 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,347 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 175 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
153
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 173 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
120
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @minhajsunna. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 175 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 43 posts held from the last 30 days (11.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📚 Удивительная и реальная история о слепом, прокаженном и лысом, которых испытал Всевышний
Шейх АбдуЛлах аль-Гъунейман (да хранит его Аллах)
🔻Ссылка на данное видео в YouTube:
https://youtu.be/hEqPa4BSUcU
Шарх великого хадиса Джибриля (мир ему) об основах религии, который называют "Мать Сунны" https://youtu.be/PE8Ata6NWBs
Культура вопроса (Фикх ас-суаль)
Один человек спросил имама Ахмада о племенах Яджудж и Маджудж: «Мусульмане ли они?» На это имам ответил: «Неужели ты уже в совершенстве овладел всеми необходимыми знаниями, чтобы спрашивать о подобном?!»
Когда же его спросили о гипотетической ситуации, которая в действительности не происходила со спрашивающим, он сказал: «Да помилует тебя Аллах, спрашивай о том, с чем ты реально сто…
Почему на душе бывает неспокойно?
Чаще всего причин две:
1️⃣ Мы слишком много следим за чужой жизнью: кто что купил, куда поехал, что сказал.
2️⃣ Мы слишком мало делаем сами: ни для своей веры, ни для своей жизни.
Хорошая новость в том, что рецепт спокойствия умещается в два коротких хадиса.
Половина первая: отпусти лишнее.
Пророк ﷺ сказал: «Признак хорошего ислама человека в том, что он оставляет то, что его н…
Из жемчужин мудрости Суфьяна ас-Саури, да помилует его Аллах:
«Я не видел ничего, что так губило бы веру, так умаляло бы достоинство, так отнимало бы радость и так занимало бы сердце, как споры и вражда».
📚 «Мухтасар Тарих Димашк» (25/104).
Как же глубока эта мудрость! Споры истощают сердце, лишают душу чистоты и отнимают у человека радость спокойствия.
✅ Сбор вопросов для передачи «Наследие Пророков».
Уважаемые братья и сестры, рады сообщить вам, что мы намереваемся провести завтра съемки с шейхом Халидом аль-Мушейкъихом (да хранит его Аллах).
Отправляйте свои вопросы в комментариях под данной публикацией.
Просьба не дублировать вопросы!
🛑СБОР ВОПРОСОВ ЗАКРЫТ🛑
📚 Наставление относительно злословия, и разъяснение того, как его можно искупить
Шейх Халид аль-Фулейдж (да хранит его Аллах)
🔻Ссылка на данное видео в YouTube:
https://youtu.be/cohLkVVCTZA
Многие легкомысленно относятся к этому великому греху, особенно женщины! | Злословие (Гъыба) https://youtu.be/L7DxJlvvwro
Предостережение от злословия и сплетни (гъыба и намима) Шейх Халид аль-Фулейдж (да хранит его Аллах) htt…
📚 Имам ат-Табари и его известный тафсир | Путь требования знаний и отец, который годами облегчал ему это дело.
Шейх Муса'ид ат-Таййяр (да хранит его Аллах)
🔻Ссылка на данное видео в YouTube:
https://youtu.be/4iR5Bd827Fw
▪️Самая первая и самая важная книга по тафсиру у мусульман - тафсир имама ат-Табари https://youtu.be/ByVsb4oZX4s
Об имаме ат-Табари - авторе одного из лучших тафсиров Ахлю сСунна | Шейх 'АбдурРазз…
📚 Сегодня мы продолжили съемки с нашим уважаемым шейхом Абдуллах аль-Гъунейманом حفظه الله.
По Милости Всевышнего приступили к шарху книги «Татхир аль-и‘тикъад ‘ан адран аль-ильхад» (تطهير الاعتقاد عن أدران الإلحاد) — «Очищение вероубеждения от скверны безбожия».
Автор данной книги — выдающийся йеменский учёный, имам Мухаммад ибн Исма'иль ас-Сан‘ани رحمه الله, живший в 1099–1182 годах по хиджре. Он был известным хад…
📚 По милости Аллаха сегодня состоялись очередные съёмки с уважаемым шейхом АбдуЛлахом аль-Гъунейманом (да хранит его Аллах).
На этот раз шейх сделал шарх известного послания «Четыре правила» (القواعد الأربع) имама Мухаммада ибн Абдуль-Ваххаба (да помилует его Аллах).
Это было последнее из известных кратких посланий имама, разбор которого мы ещё не записывали с шейхом.
Хвала Аллаху, нам удалось завершить его изучен…
📚 Облегающая одежда: важное наставление мусульманам относительно внешнего вида.
Шейх Са'д аль-Хумеййид (да хранит его Аллах)
🔻Ссылка на данное видео в YouTube:
https://youtu.be/onc0ahkjf9w
▪️Молитва в короткой футболке - Шейх Халид аль-Фулейдж
https://youtu.be/0qNWS5YSvk0
Открывается аурат во время суджуда из-за коротких футболок | Шейх АбдурРаззакъ аль-Бадр https://youtu.be/PsCKRm60D0Q
🩸 Стопа кровоточит, а шейх продолжает урок!
Вчера вечером наш уважаемый шейх, профессор, доктор Халид аль-Мушайких, да хранит его Аллах, разбирал книгу «Сафват усуль аль-фикх» на двух занятиях в Кувейте, которые в общей сложности продлились около четырёх часов.
Один из учеников рассказал мне, что во время урока у шейха кровоточила стопа. Но шейх не сдвинулся с места и не подавал признаков боли: он продолжал объясня…
📚 Почему изучение фикха следует начинать со специализированных трудов, а не со сборников хадисов?
Шейх Салих али Шейх (да хранит его Аллах)
🔻Ссылка на данное видео в YouTube:
https://youtu.be/iGdmUlxRphI
👍20💯1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 175 posts we hold for @minhajsunna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@minhajsunna edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @minhajsunna as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
22 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
22 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
22 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Tullab al-Haramayn @alharameyn · 19,482 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 October 2026
Абу Ислам аш-Шаркаси @abu_islam_official · 23,034 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026
المدرسة • 🌐 • Аль-Мадраса @madrasa · 18,918 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 October 2026
Исмаиль абу Мухаммад @Ismailabumuhammad · 26,532 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 September 2026
Шейх Солихь Аль-Усеймин @al_usemin · 20,684 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 September 2026
Шейх Усман Аль Хамис @usmankhamys · 57,198 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Доктор Мохамад Хамед @doctorMohamadhamed · 28,076 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
Юсуф Берхудар @yusufabuzakariya · 23,717 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
Бойкот Израиля @boykot_israil · 19,372 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 29 September 2026
Кирилл Джабраил @kirilljabrail · 19,266 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 30 September 2026
ХАДИСЫ И АЯТЫ @BookHadith · 33,840 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
Исламские книги PDF @kniga_pdf · 112,889 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
AL-FANAR SCHOOL @fanar_school · 24,866 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 September 2026
ИМЕНА АЛЛАХА @AsmauLLahi · 19,542 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 October 2026
𝐓 𝐀 𝐑 𝐈 𝐇/История Ислама @tarihmedia · 21,184 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 September 2026
Altruist News @altruist_news · 22,157 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Минхадж ас-Сунна” (@minhajsunna), 22,450 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/minhajsunna.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.