Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ханбалитский Мазхаб

Channel

Ханбалитский Мазхаб

@AlHanabil

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,175subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001438676483
TypeChannel
Username@AlHanabil
Created21 June 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AlHanabil

Growth

7,1757,2027,188.56 August 2026 — 7,193 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,193 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,196 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,198 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,202 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,199 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,198 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,188 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,175 subscribers6 August 202627 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 22 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,171–7,206 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 17:137,175-13
24 Aug 2026, 15:137,188-10
20 Aug 2026, 19:357,198-1
17 Aug 2026, 09:457,199-3
13 Aug 2026, 12:187,202+4
10 Aug 2026, 01:237,198+2
6 Aug 2026, 16:437,196+3
6 Aug 2026, 04:167,193no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:087,193first reading

Engagement

96 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.53%
avg views ÷ 7,175 subscribers
Avg views / post
612
95 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
96
of 96 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 91 of 95 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held96 (5 August 202620 August 2026)
Views total58,128
Reactions total1,254
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,254 reactions across 91 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
63150.3%
👍36228.9%
🔥1189.41%
😭282.23%
251.99%
👀201.59%
🤝161.28%
110.877%
😁110.877%
😴100.797%
🤩50.399%
😢40.319%
🙏40.319%
🎉30.239%
🤣30.239%
😇10.08%
🙈10.08%
🙊10.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 96 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,254reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC18 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Сказал аль Хираки аль Ханбали ум.334 г.х: Если затмение происходит вне времени, в которое разрешено совершать молитву, то вместо молитвы затмения совершаются тасбихи (то есть произносятся слова Субхана-Ллах). См.Мухтасар аль-Хираки. Стр.40

20 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC177 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Шейх ‘Абд аль-Латиф Аль аш-Шейх аль Ханбали ум.1293 г.х, да помилует его Аллах, сказал: Тот, кто утверждает, что поклоняющиеся могилам относятся к людям Сунны и общины, больше нуждается в лечении своего рассудка, чем в приведении против него довода. См.Минхадж ат-Та’сис ва ат-Такдис фи кашфи шубухат Дауд ибн Джирджис. Стр.121.

3👍1

20 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC189 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Шейх ‘Абд аль-Латиф Аль аш-Шейх аль Ханбали ум.1293 г.х, да помилует его Аллах, сказал: Второй аспект: это ограничивается теми, кто является обладателем Шахады. Это условие исключает поклоняющихся могилам, поскольку под Шахадой подразумевается таухид, как это сказано в хадисе о делегации ‘Абд аль-Кайса: “Поистине, я повелеваю вам уверовать в одного лишь Аллаха. Знаете ли вы, что такое вера (иман)? Это свидетельство

3

20 Aug 2026, 10:22 UTC161 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Имам аль-Аджурри аль Ханбали 280-360г.х, да помилует его Аллах, сказал: Если тот, кто задаёт тебе вопрос, спрашивает тебя, желая получить наставление на путь истины, а не для ведения спора, тогда наставь его самым мягким из возможных способов разъяснения, опираясь на: Книгу Аллаха; Сунну; слова сподвижников; слова имамов мусульман. А если он хочет спорить с тобой и препираться, то это именно тот человек, с которым

2👍1🤝1

20 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC217 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Имам аль-Аджурри аль Ханбали 280-360 г.х, да помилует его Аллах, сказал: Размышляй, да помилует тебя Аллах, над словами твоего Благородного Господа: разве Он упомянул иман хоть в одном месте в Коране, не связав его с праведным деянием? И Он сказал: «К Нему восходит благое слово, а праведное деяние возносит его» (Фатыр, 35:10). Тем самым Он сообщил, что сущность благого слова заключается в том, что оно возносится

5👍1

20 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC240 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Имам Абдуллах ибн Ахмад передал: Мой отец (имам Ахмад) рассказал мне: Абд ар-Раззак рассказал нам: Я слышал, как Джа‘фар ибн Сулейман передавал от Абу ‘Имрана, который сказал: Я слышал, как он говорил: Аллах не смотрит ни на что, кроме как проявляет к нему милость. Он (Абу ‘Имран) клялся и говорил: Клянусь Аллахом! Если бы Аллах посмотрел на обитателей Огня, то проявил бы к ним милость, однако Он предопределил, что

5

20 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC365 views29 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Заметил: когда речь заходит об акыде, люди бегом отписываются. Любопытный феномен.🪶

🔥169👍2😢2

20 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC376 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Шейх Ибн аль-‘Усаймин сказал во введении к своему комментарию на книгу Зад аль-Мустакни‘: Наш шейх, ‘Абд ар-Рахман ибн Насир ибн Са‘ди, побуждал нас заучивать её, то есть текст Зад аль Мустакни, и обучал нас ему. См.аш-Шарх аль-Мумти. Стр.1/5

5

20 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC407 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Сказал ибн Каййим аль Джаузия аль Ханбали 691-751 г.х: Да и какая религия и какое благо могут быть у того, кто видит, как запреты Аллаха нарушаются, Его установленные границы попираются, Его религия оставляется, а от Сунны Его Посланника мир ему и благословение Аллаха отворачиваются, и при этом его сердце холодно, а язык безмолвен? Такой человек немой шайтан.

👍7😭1

20 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC377 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Подскажите, пожалуйста, приложение, в котором можно вести письменные записи, добавлять фотографии и затем объединять всё это в один PDF-файл. Желательно, чтобы приложение работало только на телефоне, без необходимости использовать компьютер. Есть ли такие приложения?

1

20 Aug 2026, 04:52 UTC453 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Ибрахим ибн Мухаммад Джу‘ман ум.1034 г.х (насколько я сумел определить) выносит фетву о запретности танцев, покачиваний, вхождения в состояние экстаза и хлопков в ладоши, которые совершают те, кто выдаёт себя за суфиев. Что говорят выдающиеся учёные да сохранит Аллах их пользу для частных лиц и простого народа, относительно хлопков, которые совершают те, кто приписывает себя к суфизму? Являются ли они макрухом, ха

👍1

20 Aug 2026, 01:07 UTC493 views13 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

аль-Хаджави аль Ханбали ум. 968 г.х. составил небольшой труд, содержащий фетвы шейх аль-Ислама Ибн Таймии, среди которых была фетва о том, что празднование Маулида является нововведением. Так же: Рукопожатие после молитвы не является сунной; напротив, это нововведение.🪶

10👍2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @AlHanabil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTCAnonymous Poll152 voters

А если покупка золото и серебра через интернет, но с условием " оплата при получении товара?"

  1. Даа44%
  2. Неет37%
  3. Чавооо?20%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 19:11 UTCAnonymous Poll207 voters

Можно ли покупать золото и серебро через интернет?

  1. Да конечно17%
  2. Нет конечно68%
  3. Чавоо?17%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 4,319 of 1,625,404entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Исламские книги PDF
@kniga_pdf · 112,924
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
Шейх Усман Аль Хамис
@usmankhamys · 57,559
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Институт «Дироя» | معهد الدراية
@Diroya · 48,087
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ханбалитский Мазхаб” (@AlHanabil), 7,175 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AlHanabil.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.