Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 40 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,641–9,668 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 19:00
9,662
+3
13 Sept 2026, 07:16
9,659
+5
9 Sept 2026, 09:15
9,654
+10
3 Sept 2026, 20:01
9,644
-12
31 Aug 2026, 04:04
9,656
-4
27 Aug 2026, 17:55
9,660
+5
24 Aug 2026, 23:56
9,655
+11
21 Aug 2026, 07:17
9,644
-4
18 Aug 2026, 07:02
9,648
-11
14 Aug 2026, 23:45
9,659
+1
11 Aug 2026, 11:31
9,658
+2
8 Aug 2026, 09:14
9,656
-9
7 Aug 2026, 10:15
9,665
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 8 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 9,662 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,080
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
29 (8 April 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
3,245
Reactions total
131
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 05:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
8m 02s
Average length
54s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,026 reactions across 29 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,460
72.1%
👍
265
13.1%
💯
161
7.95%
🔥
80
3.95%
✍
19
0.938%
💘
13
0.642%
⚡
9
0.444%
❤🔥
5
0.247%
😢
5
0.247%
👏
2
0.099%
🤝
2
0.099%
🍓
1
0.049%
💔
1
0.049%
😁
1
0.049%
🤮
1
0.049%
🥰
1
0.049%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,026 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Испытание может иметь разные причины и мудрости. Иногда через него проверяется искренность и терпение человека, иногда оно становится причиной очищения от грехов, а иногда — возвышения его степени перед Аллахом.
Поэтому верующий старается быть в выигрыше при любых обстоятельствах https://t.me/salihaluseymi
Смысл цитаты не обязательно в том, что сами соцсети — зло. Опасность начинается тогда, когда человек перестаёт пользоваться ими как инструментом и начинает строить свою жизнь ради того, чтобы её увидели другие.
Ибн Аль Каййим говорил:
◀️Благочестивые будут в блаженстве во всех трех периодах жизни (земная жизнь, жизнь в могиле, будущая жизнь). Грешники же будут в аду во всех трех периодах жизни.
Счастье, прекрасная жизнь, блаженство… Это не что иное, как рай, рай этой жизни!
Сказал Шейх уль Ислам:
📑Поистине, в этой жизни есть рай, тот, кто не войдет в него, не войдет в рай загробной жизни»
#салихальусейми
То есть Откровение — Коран и Сунна — для сердца подобно солнечному свету для мира: пока сердце освещено им, оно видит истину и не блуждает во мраке.
https://t.me/salihaluseymi
Занятость благим — это не только способ заработать награду, но и защита от греха. Намаз, чтение Корана, получение знаний, работа, спорт, помощь семье, полезный труд — всё это оставляет меньше пространства для того, чем шайтан может воспользоваться.
Не просто борись с грехом — заполняй свою жизнь благим, чтобы для греха в ней оставалось как можно меньше места.
Не каждый вред приходит сразу. Иногда человек не начинает совершать зло с первого дня общения с плохими людьми. Но сначала меняется его сердце. Он начинает хуже думать о праведниках, считать их чрезмерно строгими, лицемерными или отсталыми. Затем ему становятся неприятны их слова, их советы и даже их благие дела. А когда сердце отвернулось от добра, путь к греху становится гораздо легче. #салихальусейми
«Этикет и смирение перед знанием и его носителями…»
Шейх Салих аль-’Усайми, да хранит его Аллах, сидит на земле, перед имамом Абдуль-Мухсином аль-’Аббадом аль-Бадром, да хранит его Аллах.
Собрание окружено книгами со всех сторон и оживляет путь праведных предшественников (саляфов) в проявлении почтения и уважения, а также в получении знания от старших ученых.
Как же прекрасно знание, когда его украшает благой нрав…
Будь на страже этой религии.
p.s:Ваши репосты -это тоже относится к распространению религии.
❤39👍8💯5
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @salihaluseymi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Шейх Усман Аль Хамис @usmankhamys · 57,362 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Минхадж ас-Сунна @minhajsunna · 22,435 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 September 2026
Абу Ислам аш-Шаркаси @abu_islam_official · 22,866 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026
Юсуф Абу Закария @yusufabuzakariya · 24,177 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
Исмаиль абу Мухаммад @Ismailabumuhammad · 26,810 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 September 2026
Доктор Мохамад Хамед @doctorMohamadhamed · 28,368 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
Мухаммад Люхайдан @Luhaiidan · 45,539 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 August 2026
Исламские книги PDF @kniga_pdf · 112,662 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 August 2026
ХАДИСЫ И АЯТЫ @BookHadith · 34,299 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
AL-FANAR SCHOOL @fanar_school · 26,084 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Шейх Салих Аль'Усейми” (@salihaluseymi), 9,662 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salihaluseymi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.