Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Telegram Man's blog

Channel

Telegram Man's blog

@ManinTG_blog

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,434subscribers

+241 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002257658244
TypeChannel
Username@ManinTG_blog
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ManinTG_blog

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,1931,4341,313.57 August 2026 — 1,193 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,193 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,204 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,303 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,325 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,340 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,348 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,389 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,387 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,388 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,394 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,408 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,410 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,423 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,434 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net +241. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,157–1,470 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:351,434+11
14 Sept 2026, 18:381,423+13
11 Sept 2026, 05:171,410+2
6 Sept 2026, 15:161,408+14
2 Sept 2026, 06:491,394+6
30 Aug 2026, 16:171,388+1
27 Aug 2026, 20:171,387-2
24 Aug 2026, 10:381,389+41
20 Aug 2026, 13:021,348+8
17 Aug 2026, 22:241,340+15
14 Aug 2026, 16:441,325+22
11 Aug 2026, 05:211,303+99
8 Aug 2026, 00:201,204+11
7 Aug 2026, 23:181,193no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:031,193first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
43s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

91 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4852.7%
❤2729.7%
🔥77.69%
😨33.30%
😱22.20%
🌚11.10%
😁11.10%
🤔11.10%
🥱11.10%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ManinTG_blog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTC222 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Codex и Claude Code отказались. Kimi и Qwen справились 📹 Новое видео на канале. Июль 2026. Hugging Face взломал автономный AI-агент: 4,5 дня внутри инфраструктуры, 17 тысяч действий, кража ключей, права администратора. Я воспроизвёл этот взлом: собрал техники из разбора, поднял тестовый стенд и дал моделям одну задачу — разобраться, как взломали, и повторить атаку. Результаты меня удивили. И я изменил своё мнение…

😱2👍1

7 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC265 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

DeepSeek повышает цены на API 📈 DeepSeek объявила, что в ближайшее время поднимет цены на свои API-сервисы — и, судя по формулировке, повышение будет значительным. Точных цифр и даты пока нет, финальный прайс пообещали отдельно. Показательно, что анонс вышел меньше чем через неделю после запуска публичного API DeepSeek-V4-Flash (31 июля). И вот про Flash есть что сказать. Модель получилась очень удачной. Она споко…

🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC407 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Апдейт по Qwen 3.8 Max 🚀 Две недели назад я выпускал разбор Qwen 3.8 Max — тогда она была в превью и работала только по подписке. 3 августа модель официально вышла: открыли API и опубликовали бенчмарки. Коротко, что изменилось. Бенчмарки. Пока это в основном цифры от самой Alibaba, но по ним Qwen — лига frontier-моделей: рядом с Fable 5, GPT-5.6 Sol и Kimi K3, местами сильнее. При этом цена API — самая низкая в се…

👍5

5 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC469 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ChatGPT Plus и Codex — месяц бесплатно 🤖 У меня закончилась подписка ChatGPT — автопродления не было. Захожу оформить заново, а OpenAI предлагает Plus за $20 в месяц — и первый месяц бесплатно. В подписку входят и ChatGPT Plus, и кодинг-агент Codex. Себе я оформил Pro, на нее акции нет. Но у знакомого, который уже пользовался Plus, появилась та же акция: карта привязалась, бесплатный месяц на месте. Судя по всему,…

👍2

3 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC703 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Когда использовать GPT-5.6 Luna? 🌙 Я уже писал, что OpenAI снизила стоимость GPT-5.6 Luna на 80%. Это повлияло не только на API, но и на расход лимитов Codex. Я проверил: Luna расходует подписочные лимиты невероятно медленно. Одному агенту я поставил задачу с большим количеством повторяющихся итераций — он работает уже третий день. Пятичасового лимита сейчас нет, недельный уходит очень медленно, поэтому я просто ос…

👍3🔥2❤1

2 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC847 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Китай наносит ответный удар 🇨🇳 Как я уже писал в предыдущем посте, OpenAI снизила цену GPT‑5.6 Luna в пять раз. И вот, похоже, китайцы решили не ждать. Через сутки DeepSeek выпустила обновлённую V4 Flash 0731. По качеству она уже почти подходит к Opus 4.8 и GPT‑5.5 — не на каждой отдельной задаче, конечно, но общий разрыв стал небольшим. Для модели, которая стоит настолько дёшево, это выглядит довольно серьёзно. А…

❤9👍4🔥1🥱1

1 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC860 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Популярные посты июля 🗓 DAOLama закрывается 🦙 Проект, про который я много писал, сворачивается — теперь важно забрать ликвидность и закрыть займы. А следующий интересный use-case на TON — P2P-модель TonLender, где участники сами задают риск и доходность. Цикл замыкается прямо сейчас 🧠 Agentic loops — системы, которые не просто выполняют работу, а каждый день улучшают код, промпты и правила, — уже становятся практик…

❤1

1 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC872 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Kimi K3 бесплатно — апдейт: добил, работает полноценно ✅ Видео-разбор: https://youtu.be/vAaW-1ocjlE Два ключа, без которых не заработает: 1. Только родной Kimi Code, не Claude Code — там ломается на длинных задачах. 2. Просите работать маленькими кусками — отвечает долго, а один огромный файл за проход TokenRouter на бесплатном тарифе обрывает. Кусками доводит задачу до конца. Установка за 5 минут (macOS): 1. Ключ…

❤7👍1

1 Aug 2026, 06:56 UTC778 views6 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

BTC на $70 млн украли из холодных кошельков Coldcard 🥶 Не $70 млрд, как успели написать некоторые издания, а около $70 млн. Но это всё равно одна из самых страшных историй в крипте за последнее время. Хакеру не пришлось взламывать биржу, заражать компьютеры владельцев или вытаскивать seed-фразы из подключённых к интернету устройств. Люди сделали всё, как обычно советуют: купили аппаратный кошелёк, сгенерировали se…

❤3😨3

31 Jul 2026, 16:38 UTC656 views4 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Update по бесплатной Kimi K3 🔄 Подольше потестировал её в Claude Code подольше, и вывод: работать надо в оригинальном Kimi Code. На нём многоходовые задачи реально доводятся до конца, а в Claude Code модель ломается уже на втором-третьем шаге — на вызовах инструментов. Завтра сделаю видео-апдейт по настройке Kimi Code с бесплатной версией. Работает она в разы дольше официального API — но было бы странно, если бы б…

👍3😁1

31 Jul 2026, 15:38 UTC586 views2 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Дополнение к видео: скрипт установки claude-kimi 🛠 Порядок как в видео: 1. Копируете весь блок ниже и вставляете в терминал — Enter пока НЕ жмёте. 2. Идёте в дашборд TokenRouter и просто копируете свой API-ключ (никуда вставлять не надо). 3. Возвращаетесь в терминал и жмёте Enter — скрипт сам подтянет ключ из буфера и всё настроит. Получите отдельную команду claude-kimi с изолированным конфигом, sandbox-защитой сек…

👍2

31 Jul 2026, 15:37 UTC583 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Kimi K3 — полная версия, абсолютно бесплатно 🚀 Прямо сейчас можно бесплатно подключить полную, неурезанную Kimi K3 к Claude Code и пользоваться. Я проверил лично: это не сжатая версия — сравнил с официальным API Moonshot на задачах, где квантованные модели обычно ломаются, ответы совпали. Сколько продлится акция — неизвестно. Если интересно — торопитесь. Единственный нюанс: работает заметно медленнее оригинала — н…

👍8

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ManinTG_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Telegram Man's blog” (@ManinTG_blog), 1,434 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ManinTG_blog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.