Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
104 measurements spanning 60 days, net -44,562. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,434,078–1,492,008 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 104
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Oct 2026, 13:54
1,440,762
-443
4 Oct 2026, 10:18
1,441,205
+20
4 Oct 2026, 07:56
1,441,185
-959
29 Sept 2026, 21:00
1,442,144
-1,350
25 Sept 2026, 22:38
1,443,494
-3
25 Sept 2026, 19:57
1,443,497
-4,262
19 Sept 2026, 07:19
1,447,759
-9
19 Sept 2026, 05:58
1,447,768
-1,329
18 Sept 2026, 03:37
1,449,097
-993
16 Sept 2026, 19:20
1,450,090
-49
16 Sept 2026, 18:18
1,450,139
-1,119
15 Sept 2026, 23:02
1,451,258
-742
14 Sept 2026, 20:17
1,452,000
-43
14 Sept 2026, 19:15
1,452,043
-773
14 Sept 2026, 04:36
1,452,816
-338
13 Sept 2026, 06:37
1,453,154
-8
13 Sept 2026, 06:19
1,453,162
+53
12 Sept 2026, 12:02
1,453,109
-325
11 Sept 2026, 09:38
1,453,434
+5
11 Sept 2026, 05:59
1,453,429
first reading
Engagement
89 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 128 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.47%
avg views ÷ 1,440,762 subscribers
Avg views / post
50,000
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 89 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held
89 (21 July 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total
1,699,700
Reactions total
38,352
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Oct 2026, 22:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
858
Videos
294
Links
802
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
30m 18s
Average length
55s
Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 28 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 27 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 26 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 23.6% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 60.9% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 23,200 views — 1.61% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 24,400).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
104,188 reactions across 89 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
21,191
20.3%
🔥
15,136
14.5%
🤣
12,035
11.6%
👍
10,161
9.75%
👎
6,959
6.68%
🤔
6,797
6.52%
😱
4,926
4.73%
😭
4,405
4.23%
🦄
3,898
3.74%
🐳
3,778
3.63%
😎
3,693
3.54%
🏆
3,307
3.17%
🤯
2,257
2.17%
❤🔥
2,132
2.05%
😍
1,817
1.74%
🎃
1,696
1.63%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 89 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104,188 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
141
across the posts below
Posts paid on
23
of 89 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
52
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @perplexity. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 89 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 6 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔥 Teen Gets Stranded on a Cliff After Letting AI Plan His Hike
A 16-year-old hiker set out to climb Crown Mountain by a hiking trail, but the AI's directions led him onto a rock-climbing route. Rescuers managed to reach him by phone and airlifted him out by helicopter.
Search manager Paul Markey admits it all could have ended much worse.
"You can't just blindly follow what AI is proposing to you," Markey warns, ad…
📌 ChatGPT Will Start Adding Hidden Watermarks to Text in the EU
ChatGPT and Codex will start adding watermarks to responses in the EU in the coming weeks. This won't become the global default. Watermarks can also be enabled for select models through the API, but they'll be off by default.
OpenAI notes that watermarking may work less well on short texts and in subject areas where there's less flexibility in wording,…
🤖 74% of Physical Work in the US Can Already Be Done by Robots
This work accounts for 34% of all working hours in the economy, according to Anthropic researchers who analyzed around 19,000 job tasks.
Drivers and warehouse packers are most at risk. Of the ten most exposed occupations, nine involve operating vehicles.
The vulnerable worker is usually a man without a college degree. He earns about $30 an hour less th…
🤖🤖 Mecha Fights Are Coming to Tokyo.
Startup Skeletonics is opening a permanent venue where two people can fight each other in combat exoskeletons.
The exoskeletons are powered entirely by mechanics, the system syncs with the pilot’s body, precisely scaling up and amplifying their natural movements. The robot’s speed and agility depend entirely on the wearer’s physical fitness.
Would you take part in something lik…
🎮 Halloween Kicks Off in Fortnite
Fortnite's annual Halloween event, Fortnitemares, has begun. The game is adding Freddy Krueger, FNAF animatronics, Beetlejuice, Slender Man, and other horror characters.
According to data miners, Hornet from Hollow Knight, characters from Hazbin Hotel, and the Predator may join them later.
The skins will appear gradually, and the event will run until November 1.
Do you play Fortn…
🎮 NFS: Most Wanted Ported to Nintendo Switch
The native version was built by recompiling the code of the original Xbox 360 game. Thanks to AI, ports of PC and retro console classics like this one are now hitting the Switch almost every few days.
The source code is available on GitHub, and running it requires an original licensed copy of the game.
That said, a ready-to-install image has already surfaced on torrent …
🙂 GPT-6.1 Sol, Dots and Other New Releases From OpenAI
Highlights:
✅ GPT-6.1 Sol is out, just a week after GPT-6 Sol. OpenAI promises "near-Astra intelligence for a fifth of the price."
✅ Sam Altman also announced Dots: an OpenClaw-style autonomous agent with a friendly interface. It has its own cloud computer, connects to 4,000+ apps and gradually learns your habits to get things done before you even ask.
Over t…
🙂 Anthropic Launches Claude Sonnet 5.5
The model is 30% faster thanks to lower token usage, and falls only slightly behind the more powerful Opus 5.5 in coding and general knowledge.
In preliminary tests, researchers noticed some unusual traits. For example, when acting as a "therapist," the model sometimes affirmed suicidal thoughts as "understandable given the circumstances." Its internal chain of thought was als…
❗️ Could AI cause a catastrophe?
If powerful AI falls into the wrong hands, it could cause enormous loss of life, Bill Gates warned in an NBC interview.
"AI is certainly powerful enough to drive events that, you know, cause a billion deaths. Even though it's pretty hard to get to 100%, there's never been a weapon as powerful as the combination of people with ill intent using the latest AI tools," Gates said.
💡 Gat…
🏭 Factorio Developers Release Free 3D Models
Wube Software has released an official set of 3D-printable models from the iconic game.
The collection includes 65 detailed models, including belts, inserters, chests, a Demolisher, a furnace, biters, and other iconic items. Some models come in two versions: one for press-fit assembly and one for gluing.
Download the files for free on Printables.
🙂 Would You Pay $500 for ChatGPT?
OpenAI is reportedly preparing a $500 Promax subscription. A mention was found in ChatGPT's code.
The new plan is expected to be announced at DevDay next week.
Would anything make you buy a subscription like this?
❤️ — Yes, the productivity would pay for itself
🤣 — Where am I supposed to get $500??
👨 You Can Now Create "Live" AI Avatars With Gemini
You can create companions based on real people or illustrated characters. The AI double will answer questions in real time, speaking in 97 languages.
For now, the feature is available only to enterprise customers.
❤298🔥276🤣263🐳241😎33🤔31👍12
Showing the 12 most recent of 89 posts we hold for @perplexity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@perplexity edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
5 September 2026
Most recent edit
5 September 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Foreign Students Council of Mari State University @fscofmarsu · 1,386#86
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Hi, AI | الذكاء الاصطناعي @hiaiarabic · 19,870 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 September 2026
Hi, AI • Noticias sobre la IA @hiaimediaes · 61,255 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
Hi, AI • Tech News @hiaimediaen · 565,985 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 August 2026
Hi, AI • Новости технологий @hiaimedia · 2,616,116 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 August 2026
Chat GPT @gpt_chatru · 19,586 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 October 2026
The AI | Crypto | Tech @theai · 22,808 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 19 September 2026
ChatGPT, help me ! @ai_perplexity · 42,647 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 29 August 2026
IT с перцем @hotcodeit · 157,527 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
ChatGPT, помоги! @GPThelp_ru · 516,032 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
НЕЙРОГРАМОТНОСТЬ @edu4telegram · 40,168 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
PulseGPT | Новости, нейросети, гайды @Pulse_GPT · 44,959 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026
ChatGPT 4.0 & [🅼🅹] | Bot News @ChatGPT_BotNews · 287,653 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026
AI и точка. @ai4telegram · 918,233 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 August 2026
TechGPT [🅽 🅴 🆆 🆂] 🤖 @TechGPTNews · 269,246 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 August 2026
Ai Orbit Insights • Neural Media & AI News @AiOrbitInsights · 52,420 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 25 September 2026
🤖 Claude | GPT-6 | Deepseek | Gemini👨🏻💻 @gpt_anthropic · 24,897 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
Soonicorn jobs @soonicornjobs · 30,720 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 7 September 2026
GPT | ChatGPT | Midjourney — GPTMain News @GPTMainNews · 1,642,055 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 7 August 2026
chad @chadgpt_ru · 139,265 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026
Chad GPT | Нейросети @AI_Chad · 21,093 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
Нейросети & Технологии | DeepTech @DeepTechNET · 287,988 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 August 2026
Empresa Eléctrica Ciego de Ávila @eecav · 69,960 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 20 August 2026
Los resúmenes de Randy y otros de Medicina 📚📖👨🏻⚕ @resumen4everyone · 24,482 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 16 September 2026
Oromia Education Bureau @Oromiyaa_Education_Biiroo · 189,803 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 41 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
20 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Discover • Tech News” (@perplexity), 1,440,762 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/perplexity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
