Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Козацький・GetMany.com

Channel

Козацький・GetMany.com

@kozakify

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,543subscribers

-64 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001813731254
TypeChannel
Username@kozakify
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kozakify

Growth

5,5435,6085,575.57 August 2026 — 5,607 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,607 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,608 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,605 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,575 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,569 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,567 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,561 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,556 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,559 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5,558 subscribers6 September 2026 — 5,543 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 30 days, net -64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,533–5,618 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 00:575,543-15
1 Sept 2026, 21:575,558-1
30 Aug 2026, 07:535,559+3
27 Aug 2026, 04:075,556-5
24 Aug 2026, 11:055,561-6
20 Aug 2026, 15:395,567-2
17 Aug 2026, 14:555,569-6
14 Aug 2026, 05:475,575-30
10 Aug 2026, 16:065,605-3
8 Aug 2026, 01:475,608+1
7 Aug 2026, 10:305,607no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:205,607first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 39s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

702 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
33447.6%
🔥19828.2%
👍7410.5%
395.56%
🤣172.42%
😢141.99%
custom 5399888628358855518131.85%
custom 544759143425115883950.712%
🍌30.427%
👏30.427%
👌10.142%
🤝10.142%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 702 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kozakify. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 March 2026 to 14 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Jul 2026, 12:49 UTC≈2,480 views77 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Друзі, дякую усім за підписки та за те що чекаєте на мої пости. Я до кінця літа відпочиваю, та хочу повернутись з декілька новими проектами. Усіх обняв!

619👍4🤣3

1 Jun 2026, 10:58 UTC≈5,560 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Якщо ви пам'ятаєте, я писав, що Anthropic запустили свій перший дуже важкий, дуже довгий сертифікат Claude Certified Architect. Нас відібрали в партнери та мені треба ще 5 сертифікатів (у нас в компанії багато хто не пройшов його, пам-пам). Ще є охочі пройти сертифікат від моєї компанії? Ви лише оплачуєте його за $49 замість $99 - знижку вони мені теж зробили. Заявку можна залиши ось тут: https://docs.google.com/fo

32

21 May 2026, 12:48 UTC≈5,700 views23 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

🏆 Маленька перемога на Upwork! Upwork тихо зарелізив “cashback” на Connects: 15 за інтерв’ю + 15 за старт контракту. На перший погляд це подарунок агенціям, котрі витрачають сотні та тисячі доларів на конекти. Насправді це визнання проблеми, яку платформа сама і створила. Connects подорожчали настільки, що CAC для серйозного фрілансера чи агенції став порівнянним з paid ads. Люди почали рахувати ROI на кожен bid і

11🤣6👍5😢1

16 May 2026, 12:33 UTC≈5,970 views60 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

знайшов інструмент, який дозволяє Claude Code самостійно протестити весь iOS-застосунок 👀 сам заходить у додаток, відкриває кожен екран, проходить флоу, читає debug-логи, ловить баги/креші/UI-артефакти. на виході: • structured bug report • скріни проблем • reproduction steps • логи по суті QA engineer. ось тут: https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1sh5aae/i_let_claude_code_autonomously_test_my_ios_app_it/

🔥487🍌2🤣2custom 53998886283588555181

Signed Kyrylo Kozak

6 May 2026, 14:01 UTC≈7,310 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🤝 шукаю Senior Affiliate & Partnerships Manager на getmany.com взяв окремий кредит саме під цей найм. перша дедікована affiliate-роль у команді - будем будувати канал з нуля, а не підтримувати чужі процеси. кого шукаю: 🛰 2-5 років досвіду в SaaS affiliate / partnerships 📊 розумієш CAC, churn, retention 🤖 працював з FirstPromoter, PartnerStack або impact.com 🌍 fluent business English Лісабон або remote, 30 днів від

👍51

Signed Kyrylo Kozak

5 May 2026, 13:11 UTC≈4,610 views25 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

⚠️ ТАК ТРЕБА МАКСИМАЛЬНА УВАГА!!!! А/В ТЕСТІНГ ЗАЯВОК НА UPWORK. НАРЕШТІ. АААА 🔥🔥 Я про це мріяв ще з 2022, і ось воно живе. Тестуєш два cover letter, обираєш метрику, AI сам визначає переможця і відправляє його на майбутні jobs. Data-driven bidding, а не гадання на кавовій гущі!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! А ще тепер є сигнали клієнта (верифікація імені та компанії перед заявкою) і можливість виключати спамерів-клієнтів назав

16🔥6👍2🤝1

Signed Kyrylo Kozak

28 Apr 2026, 12:48 UTC≈5,140 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Увага агенціям і фрилансерам на апворку. Важливо. Останні дні Upwork почав автоматично відкидати пропосали, в яких є loom-відео або будь-які зовнішні посилання. На пошту прилітає лист «Feedback Abuse/Violation», пропосал withdrawn без можливості редагувати. Знайома агенція отримала 6 таких листів поспіль за один проєкт за вихідні. Шість. На один. Проєкт. Що було в пропосалі: • cover letter без жодного зовнішньог

28😢4🤣1

Signed Kyrylo Kozak

22 Apr 2026, 15:47 UTC≈4,850 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026

На Upwork у чаті заборонено писати слова Stripe, WhatsApp, PayPal, phone, contact and etc... Абсурд, але треба про це написати. Автомодерація вважає, що ви намагаєтеся переманити клієнта поза платформу, і може заблокувати акаунт. Ви інтегратор Stripe. Клієнт питає: "З яким стеком ви працюєте?". Ви не можете написати назву власного стеку 🙃 Пам-пам Платформа буквально змушує фрілансерів грати в "кота з мишкою" з вла

14😢9👍5🤣3🍌1👏1

Signed Kyrylo Kozak

19 Apr 2026, 07:01 UTC≈5,690 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026

❕ Другий Claude Code хакатон від Anthropic 21-28 квітня, fully virtual. Я на першому був, розкажу про свій досвід. • 500 учасників, max команда -2 людини (можна соло) • Application + approval, не first-come-first-served • $500 в Claude API credits кожному, хто пройшов відбір • $100k в credits - головний приз • Судять: Boris Cherny [наш 🐘 з Одеси], Cat Wu, Thariq Shihpar, Lydia Hallie, Ado Kukic, Jason Bigman (вся Cl

42👍5🔥2👌1

Signed Kyrylo Kozak

14 Apr 2026, 11:05 UTC≈7,480 views71 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🤖 Claude Code отупішав: що сталось і як пофіксити Директор AI в AMD проаналізувала 6 852 сесії Claude Code і виклала все на GitHub. 234 760 tool calls. 17 871 thinking blocks. Висновок: "Claude cannot be trusted." Що сталось? Anthropic тихенько зробили дві речі: - Включили adaptive thinking - де клод САМ вирішує наскільки глибоко думати. Спойлер: на деяких запитах він виділяв НУЛЬ токенів на мислення. Просто не дум

👍4121custom 53998886283588555186🔥2custom 54475914342511588391

Signed Kyrylo Kozak

9 Apr 2026, 08:43 UTC≈5,540 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

https://animations.dev/ Скіл Еміля з анімаціями - це лід дизайнер Linear (!!!) Пройдіть його курс, якщо вам сподобається цей скіл!

21custom 54475914342511588394

Signed Kyrylo Kozak

1 Apr 2026, 19:27 UTC≈6,300 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

ТІЛЬКИ ЩО НАШ БОРІС ЧОРНИЙ ВИПУСТИВ NO_FLICKER MODE ДЛЯ CLAUDE CODE 🔥 Новий experimental renderer для терміналу - менше мерехтіння, підтримка mouse events (так, в терміналі!), і більшість внутрішньої команди Anthropic вже перейшли на нього. Як спробувати: CLAUDE_CODE_NO_FLICKER=1 claude Одна змінна середовища і ваш термінал стає набагато приємніший. Поки що experimental. — Цікаво як вони просто забили на витік so

🔥24👍72🤣2

Signed Kyrylo Kozak

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kozakify. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Козацький・GetMany.com” (@kozakify), 5,543 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kozakify.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.