Channel
@gpt_anthropic
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,043subscribers
-600 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002084625070 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gpt_anthropic |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gpt_anthropic |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 25,043 | -25 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:01 | 25,068 | -30 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 25,098 | -25 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 25,123 | -28 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 25,151 | -38 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 25,189 | -78 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 25,267 | -26 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 25,293 | -15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 25,308 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:48 | 25,317 | -17 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 25,334 | -19 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 25,353 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 25,363 | -20 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 25,383 | -15 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 25,398 | -30 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 25,428 | -10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 25,438 | -12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 25,450 | -45 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 25,495 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 25,494 | first reading |
303 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 303 (6 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 19,901 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
GPT opens 51 Flinders Ln as Firmus and JCDecaux join East End's new-economy precinct September 3, 2026 -- The GPT Group (GPT) today officially opened 51 Flinders Ln, its $555 million office development in Melbourne's East End, an... Plentisoft | markets.businessinsider.com • Sep 3, 2026
CrowdStrike Is Putting GPT-5.6 Cyber Inside Falcon. Is OpenAI Becoming a Cybersecurity Distribution Partner? CrowdStrike and OpenAI are turning a model partnership into a security distribution deal. On September 2, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRWD) said GPT-5.6 Cyber would come to the Falcon platform, starting with its Frontier AI Readiness and Resilience (FAIRR) Service. Falcon Guardian will also provide run…
Expected Sept 3 ChatGPT 6 Release Carries Hidden Reasoning Risks OpenAI ChatGPT 6 Astra rumors point to a recurrent depth architecture that boosts AI reasoning while hiding it in latent space, risking cybersecurity. Julian Horsey | geeky-gadgets.com • Sep 2, 2026
Meta Unveils Its Most Powerful Model Yet, Muse Spark 1.3, with Coding Capabilities Surpassing GPT-5.6 Sol Meta on Wednesday released its most powerful AI model to date, Muse Spark 1.3, with Chief AI Officer Alexandr Wang claiming it surpasses OpenAI's GPT-… BigGo Finance | finance.biggo.com • Sep 2, 2026
AI ‘recalibration’ Lets Smaller Models Match The Power Of GPT-4V Researchers achieved GPT-4V-level performance with smaller vision-language models using GenRecal, a new distillation framework. The Neuron | quantumzeitgeist.com • Sep 2, 2026
GPT's new $555m Melbourne office to open nearly two-thirds vacant New leases have been struck with Firmus and JCDecaux, but there's still plenty of space to fill at 51 Flinders Lane greenstreetnews.com • Sep 2, 2026
CrowdStrike joins OpenAI's Daybreak Cyber Partner Program with GPT-5.4-Cyber access CrowdStrike joins OpenAI's Daybreak Cyber Partner Program, integrating GPT-5.4-Cyber into Falcon and Charlotte AI AgentWorks for faster threat Editorial Team | cryptobriefing.com • Sep 2, 2026
Google launches Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber, claims model beats Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol on some benchmarks Google has officially introduced two models under Gemini 3.8, calling it the company's strongest coding and logical reasoning model to date as the company continues a rapid deployment cycle that marks its third Flash launch in six weeks. The latest models arrive three weeks after the debut of ver…
CrowdStrike Expands OpenAI Partnership to Secure Codex Agents and Integrate GPT-5.6 Cyber CrowdStrike (NASDAQ:CRWD) has expanded its OpenAI partnership to secure Codex agents with Falcon Guardian and bring GPT-5. 6 Cyber into the Falcon platform, extending its cybersecurity strategy deeper into enterprise AI deployment and AI-assisted defense. Fiona Craig | finance.yahoo.com • Sep 2, 2026
OpenAI Details GPT-Live’s Architecture for Continuous Stateful Voice Interaction OpenAI recently published an engineering account of GPT-Live. It described how they designed the system to maintain continuous voice interaction while separating latency-sensitive media processing from broader application work. The live path contains the media pipeline and inference loop, while delegation, tool use, persistence, and oth…
OpenAI to limit release of its Astra model due to hacking concerns OpenAI says Astra is considerably more capable at cyber tasks than GPT-5.6 Sol. Following the Hugging Face incident, it is being especially cautious about releasing it. Emily Forlini | fortune.com • Sep 1, 2026
Anthropic's Claude Fable 5.1 rated No.1, beating GPT and Grok Anthropic has unveiled its new AI model, Claude Fable 5.1, which took the top two spots in an external language-model ranking shortly after launch, ahead of rival models from OpenAI, Google and others. In Artificial Analysis scores, Fable 5.1 variants scored 66 and 65, while Claude Opus 5 scored 63. Anthropic also reported higher performance on its benchm…
Showing the 12 most recent of 303 posts we hold for @gpt_anthropic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🤖 OpenAI | ChatGPT | GPT-4o | GPT-4👨🏻💻” (@gpt_anthropic), 25,043 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gpt_anthropic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.