🔜 Apple’s next event is happening on October 13 Expected to be shown: • New Apple TV and HomePod • A single hub for controlling your smart home @iPhone
❤8👍3🔥3👏1

Channel
@iphone
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
141,169subscribers
-13,275 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1002085492047 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @anews @apples @dailyapple @iphone |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 143 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iphone |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 00:57 | 141,169 | -47 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 19:39 | 141,216 | -99 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 06:15 | 141,315 | -658 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 18:00 | 141,973 | -1 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 17:38 | 141,974 | -82 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 10:54 | 142,056 | -145 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 19:39 | 142,201 | -1,367 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 21:56 | 143,568 | -24 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 19:54 | 143,592 | -197 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 143,789 | -146 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 00:40 | 143,935 | -841 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 144,776 | -182 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 144,958 | -239 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:55 | 145,197 | -9 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:21 | 145,206 | -26 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 145,232 | -163 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:40 | 145,395 | -153 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 145,548 | -13 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:59 | 145,561 | -60 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 145,621 | first reading |
59 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 133 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 59 (24 July 2026 – 8 October 2026) |
| Views total | 185,638 |
| Reactions total | 1,582 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Oct 2026, 23:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,797 reactions across 58 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,105 | 39.5% | |
| 👍 | 279 | 9.97% | |
| 🔥 | 264 | 9.44% | |
| 🤣 | 245 | 8.76% | |
| 👏 | 103 | 3.68% | |
| 😁 | 85 | 3.04% | |
| 😍 | 59 | 2.11% | |
| 👎 | 58 | 2.07% | |
| 👌 | 55 | 1.97% | |
| 🤡 | 55 | 1.97% | |
| 😭 | 42 | 1.50% | |
| 💩 | 36 | 1.29% | |
| 🤯 | 35 | 1.25% | |
| 😱 | 31 | 1.11% | |
| 🥴 | 30 | 1.07% | |
| 💔 | 24 | 0.858% | |
| 👀 | 23 | 0.822% | |
| 🤔 | 21 | 0.751% | |
| 🎃 | 20 | 0.715% | |
| ⚡ | 18 | 0.644% | |
| 34 further kinds | 209 | 7.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,831 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 8 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @iphone. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 59 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 8 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔜 Apple’s next event is happening on October 13 Expected to be shown: • New Apple TV and HomePod • A single hub for controlling your smart home @iPhone
❤8👍3🔥3👏1
🎧 Apple opens a real path into creative careers for young people 📰 Apple and The King's Trust (a UK charity founded by King Charles III) just launched Creative Labs. ℹ️ It's a new program for young people aged 18-30 who want to build a career in the creative industries. The first cohort of up to 20 people will join hands-on workshops with Apple experts and learn industry-ready skills using Apple tech. It already ki…
❤12👍8🎉4👏3🥱2🔥1
🎵 Apple Music is getting a new logo 📱 The new logo has been spotted in macOS 27.2 beta 3 and iOS 27.2 beta 3. It's identical to the one Apple used last month when announcing Apple Music Hall. At first it wasn't clear whether the design was exclusive to the venue. Now everything points to it being the new official logo for the streaming service. 🍎 Apple's official Apple Music website and web player still show the ol…
❤24👎6🔥4🤩3👍2😁2👏1🤔1
🆕 MacBook Pro with a touch OLED display is coming and will be "significantly lighter" 📰 Bloomberg's Mark Gurman said the new MacBook Pro models will be "significantly lighter" than the existing MacBook Pro models: Apple has reengineered the machine's interior, miniaturizing parts and rearranging components to make the computer much easier to carry. With this newly-reported detail, the new models are now rumored to …
❤11👍9🤨5🔥1🤝1
📦 Apple Stores received mysterious "Do Not Open" boxes 📰 Apple retail stores received confidential boxes earlier this week with "Do Not Open Until October 8" stickers. The boxes are believed to contain new visual merchandise, which lets store staff update labels, graphics and product layouts around new releases. 🔮 What's likely coming: a smart home hub, a new Apple TV 4K and the HomePod mini 2. Bloomberg's Mark Gur…
❤17👍6🔥3❤🔥2👏2👨💻2💘2🎉1
🫨 John Ternus is preparing a major shake-up at Apple 📰 Bloomberg reports that Apple's new chief wants to flatten the corporate structure by cutting out layers of middle management that sit between engineering teams and top executives. The plan is still not finalized. 🔄 Ternus believes Apple needs to be faster and bolder to keep its market lead, with new devices released year-round instead of being tied to the fall …
❤15👍9🔥5👏4👌3🙏3👎1🕊1
🔜 Apple enters the smart home on October 13 📰 According to Gurman, Apple plans to launch several new devices: • HomePad (J490) – smart home hub with a ~6–7" display • HomePod mini 2 – new hardware, Siri AI support, new colors • Apple TV 4K – A17 Pro chip or newer, Apple Intelligence, same design • HomePod 3 – in the works, no release date yet 🐌 The launch was repeatedly delayed by Siri AI, even though Apple TV and …
❤12👍7🤯4⚡3👌2👏2🔥2
💸 Apple hit with a record $5.7B verdict over Taptic Engine patents 📰 A San Diego federal jury found that the Taptic Engine in iPhone and Apple Watch infringes two Taction Technology patents and awarded $5.72B, the largest US patent award to date. Taction sued in 2021. 👨⚖️ The jury found the infringement wasn't willful. Apple says the Taptic Engine is fundamentally different from Taction's technology and will appea…
❤10👏6😱5🤬4😁4🤨3🎃1🤔1
🔋 iPhone 18 Pro Max has a battery so big that Apple had to limit it in software 🚢 The battery is over 20 Wh, which puts it above the shipping limits set by many carriers and postal services. So Apple added a "Prepare for Shipping" feature that keeps available capacity below 20 Wh. 📦 New phones ship with the limit already on, and it's removed automatically on first activation. @iPhone
❤27👍12🤯9😁6👌2🔥2💔1
😏 Not as scratch-resistant as we'd think The difference between titanium and aluminum, visualized. 🥺 Turns out the new iPhone 18 Pro Max is pretty prone to scratches. Especially noticeable on the burgundy finish. 🔎 One tech guy put it side by side with his iPhone 15 Pro Max, which he's been using daily for three years. The 18 Pro Max? Only four days old. @iPhone
😭27😁8❤7👎5👀3👨💻3😈3😢3
🏋️♀️ Apple is working on a screenless fitness tracker 📰 According to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, Apple has been exploring the idea for several months and is now developing prototypes. The prototypes reportedly consist of a thin fabric band and a sensor-equipped computing module, with no screen in sight – the key difference from the display-driven Apple Watch. • The move comes as competitors such as Whoop and smart ri…
❤19👌5👏3🤡3🙏2⚡1👎1
👂 First detailed leaks on the @iPhone 20 Pro have surfaced Even smaller Dynamic Island and a "borderless" display. 📰 Apple is repotedly testing a quad-curved design — where all four edges of the screen are curved. The result is a smooth effect that makes it look like there are no bezels at all. 📏 The displays themselves will grow too: 6.41 inches for the Pro and 6.96 inches for the Pro Max. This year's current mod…
🥴26🤣15❤7😐7⚡3👍2🔥1🤨1
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @iphone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Apple News” (@iphone), 141,169 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iphone.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.