Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 13 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 13 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 3,219 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 June 2020 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 13, the earliest publisher we hold is @coinmarket. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 12 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
284 measurements spanning 72 days, net -362,686. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,052,458–2,523,950 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 284
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Oct 2026, 08:55
2,106,861
-363
17 Oct 2026, 05:56
2,107,224
-1,233
16 Oct 2026, 22:54
2,108,457
-409
16 Oct 2026, 22:10
2,108,866
-86
16 Oct 2026, 20:11
2,108,952
-139
16 Oct 2026, 19:36
2,109,091
-648
16 Oct 2026, 15:54
2,109,739
-777
16 Oct 2026, 10:56
2,110,516
-429
16 Oct 2026, 07:55
2,110,945
-2,886
15 Oct 2026, 23:35
2,113,831
-1,186
15 Oct 2026, 19:09
2,115,017
no change
15 Oct 2026, 19:00
2,115,017
-23
15 Oct 2026, 18:00
2,115,040
-740
15 Oct 2026, 14:00
2,115,780
-320
15 Oct 2026, 12:20
2,116,100
-743
15 Oct 2026, 09:09
2,116,843
-1,594
15 Oct 2026, 03:08
2,118,437
-1,561
14 Oct 2026, 15:49
2,119,998
-13
14 Oct 2026, 15:46
2,120,011
-291
14 Oct 2026, 14:59
2,120,302
first reading
Engagement
3,582 posts held, back to 18 October 2019 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4,320 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.123%
avg views ÷ 2,106,861 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,590
84 posts measured
Reaction rate
40.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
84
of 3,582 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 October 2026
Posts held
3,582 (18 October 2019 – 17 October 2026)
Views total
217,790
Reactions total
88,987
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Oct 2026, 14:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
13m 23s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 73 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (1 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 69 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 17 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 23.7% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 58.9% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 1,460 views — 0.069% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 1,600).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
199,742 reactions across 201 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
49,687
24.9%
👍
23,041
11.5%
🔥
18,840
9.43%
💯
13,016
6.52%
😁
12,759
6.39%
🙏
11,418
5.72%
👎
11,360
5.69%
🤝
10,436
5.22%
😢
9,902
4.96%
😱
9,458
4.74%
🤯
8,591
4.30%
🤔
7,941
3.98%
💔
7,854
3.93%
🐳
5,439
2.72%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 996 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 416,032 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 8 October 2025 to 17 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 996 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @venture. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 8 October 2025 to 17 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇺🇸 US Deficit Hits $1.992 Trillion
The US budget deficit reached $1.992 trillion in fiscal 2026, up 12% from $1.775 trillion in 2025. It was the 3rd largest in US history, at about 6.2% of GDP, and the 25th straight year in the red. The last surplus was in 2001.
Revenue and spending both hit records at $5.403 trillion and $7.396 trillion. Social Security cost nearly $1.7 trillion, Medicare almost $1.1 trillion, and…
🚘 Volvo Extends Nvidia Self-Driving Partnership
Volvo Cars expanded its nearly decade-long partnership with Nvidia. Future models will use Nvidia Hyperion sensors and compute, the Alpamayo software stack, and the Halos safety layer for hands-free, door-to-door driving across highways, city streets, and parking areas.
The system is Level 2++ supervised autonomy, with drivers remaining responsible. It covers traffic …
🚀 AI Servers for Space
Jensen Huang says Nvidia and SpaceX engineers are working on a new type of server for AI data centers in space that could also work on Earth.
He compared Elon to Google because he trains AI models, runs Grok, and rents out compute. Nvidia is helping design infrastructure that SpaceX could eventually take into orbit using reusable rockets.
✔️ @venture
📈 ETF Growth Is Moving Into Leverage
Since the S&P 500’s October 2022 low, ETF assets have risen more than 250%. Assets in ETFs using derivatives are up more than 450%. Issuers launched 3,363 new ETFs, and more than 30% of this year’s launches use leverage, according to VettaFi.
The shift is also pulling money from traditional vehicles. Equity ETFs attracted $3.2 trillion, while equity mutual funds lost $3.3 trilli…
🤖 AI Boom Starts Spreading Inflation
Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee says the AI boom is becoming an inflation problem. Price pressure is spreading beyond data center components and adjacent industries.
Illinois businesses report scarce electricians, higher construction costs, and year-long waits for electrical components as data centers compete for the same resources. Land, power, water, and infrastructure c…
KOSPI fell 8%, triggering a circuit breaker. The Korean Exchange halted stock and program trading for 20 minutes.
The index is down 21% in 7 sessions, wiping out over ₩1,186 trillion ($880 billion).
✔️ @venture
🏦 Private Businesses Are the Hidden Wealth Engine
Economists Owen Zidar and Eric Zwick estimate that roughly 3 million Americans hold more than $65 trillion in wealth as owners of privately held businesses. About 1.7 million have built fortunes of at least $10 million this way. For every public-company CEO, there are more than 1,000 private-business owners worth over $25 million.
The scale was hard to see because m…
📈 The S&P 500 Enters Year Five
The S&P 500 has gained 118% since the bull market began in October 2022. That makes it the third-best start to a bull market at its fourth birthday, based on analysis from Carson Group’s Ryan Detrick. Only 2 of the 7 other bull markets reaching this point in the past 7 decades started with larger gains.
History offers a wider range. Bull markets since 1950 delivered an average full-cy…
US private fixed investment in information processing equipment and software reached a record 5.05% of US GDP, up 1.08 percentage points since Q3 2023.
Investment rose $531 billion to a record annual rate of $1.65 trillion. It previously peaked at 4.46% in Q4 2000, before the 2001 recession.
The investment has more than doubled since Q1 2018, reflecting an unprecedented AI spending boom.
✔️ @venture
Ⓜ️ Agent Commerce Could Lift Shopping Frequency
Mark Zuckerberg says his AI agent increased his Instacart orders from “twice a year” to “twice a week”, about 50x more often, by making shopping easier.
That points to the larger? opportunity: reducing buying friction could increase shopping frequency, not just move existing purchases online.
As personal agents communicate with business agents, $META could sit on bot…
📈 AI Stocks Drive Market
Since the start of 2024, 42 AI stocks have generated 67% of the S&P 500’s price return, contributing 22 percentage points of its 33% gain. The other 458 stocks added 11 percentage points.
The AI basket also accounted for 58% of earnings growth and 81% of CapEx and R&D growth. The rest of the index contributed just 20% of CapEx and R&D growth.
Only 29% of stocks outperformed the S&P 500 ove…
💯596❤252👍132🔥111😁53
Showing the 12 most recent of 3,582 posts we hold for @venture. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@venture edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
1 September 2026
Most recent edit
28 September 2026
Mentions
Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
10
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
10
vacant every time we have ever looked
@venture named 10 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@relevant_theory named in 8 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@price_eng2 named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@price_eng named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@santacoininu named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@santacoinmoon named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@steer_crypto named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@ether named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@waktrx named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@michaelprotrade named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@number_997 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Crypto Insider @coinmarket · 2,005,918 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 August 2026
Startups & Ventures @tech · 2,136,473 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 August 2026
Trade Watcher @stockbot · 2,076,756 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 August 2026
Not Memes @notmemes · 85,844 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
Programmer ♨️ @programmer · 181,219 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
Solanapayouts.com @SolanaPayouts · 179,191 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
OOIA - TON NFT Marketplace @ooiaton · 262,053 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
TONX 💎 @TONXstudio · 101,869 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
Everscale News @everscale_news · 271,364 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
tAppTales @tapptales · 101,035 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 August 2026
Newcastle United @newcastle · 93,459 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 August 2026
Elon Musk @elon_musk · 106,556 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
CoLabs: coNFT, CoPump, CoPass @co_nft · 144,466 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
The Daily Stats @dailystats · 30,389 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
$VODKA | MEMECOIN ON $SOL @vodkatokensol · 255,447 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
TON News @newston_en · 136,924 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 August 2026
nest @nest_dex · 113,201 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
Not Meme @notmeme · 160,376 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
КАПИТАЛИСТ @codycapitalist · 29,656 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 7 September 2026
Tonex @Tonex_app · 83,767 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 August 2026
WEB3 TON DNS Media @web3tondns · 150,962 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
Apple News @iphone · 139,436 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
KKX NEWS @kkxnews · 141,554 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
The Financial Express @TheFinancialExpressOnline · 45,124 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
94 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Venture Capital” (@venture), 2,106,861 subscribers as measured 17 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/venture.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
