Расследуем тайны подземной ЛАБОРАТОРИИ — нашли ностальгический приключенческий экшен. Компанию Biotec подозревают в тяжком преступлении, но проверки ничего не нашли. Вам предстоит самому облазить её подземный комплекс и докопаться до правды. В игре нужно собирать детали и мастерить из них оружие, снаряжение и инструменты. Локации разные: задымленные лаборатории, серверные залы, склады, канализация, теплицы и пещеры…

Channel
Тренды России | Новости
@onerussia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,407,516subscribers
-117,119 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001936387363 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @onerussia |
| Description | ‼️КАНАЛ ПРОДАЁТСЯ‼️Писать @vr777 Самое главное и интересное на канале Тренды России - события, мероприятия, люди и то, что их интересует прямо сейчас. Знаем про тренды - ВСЁ и быстрее всех. Реклама | писать сюда @vr777 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onerussia |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 33% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:19 | 1,407,516 | -5,176 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 1,412,692 | -4,188 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 1,416,880 | -4,416 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:21 | 1,421,296 | -6,195 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 1,427,491 | -6,150 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 1,433,641 | -10,957 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:41 | 1,444,598 | -4,949 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:54 | 1,449,547 | -4,146 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:49 | 1,453,693 | -3,838 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 1,457,531 | -3,251 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:06 | 1,460,782 | -3,090 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 1,463,872 | -3,428 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:24 | 1,467,300 | -2,921 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 1,470,221 | -2,257 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 1,472,478 | -1,970 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 1,474,448 | -2,782 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:49 | 1,477,230 | -5,067 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 1,482,297 | -5,155 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 1,487,452 | -3,142 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 1,490,594 | first reading |
Engagement
182 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.56%
- avg views ÷ 1,407,516 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 21,900
- 148 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 148
- of 182 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 182 (3 August 2026 – 20 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,240,138 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Sept 2026, 18:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,100
- Videos
- ≈813
- Links
- ≈52
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 41m 52s
- Average length
- 29s
Measured directly from 88 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 144 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 18 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 15 minutes of being posted; a typical post has already reached 98.6% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 99.5% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 21,900 views — 1.56% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 22,400).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /643219 Sept 2026, 12:26 UTC | 109 minutes – 5.3 hours old | 21,400 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 21,300 interp. → 3.0 hours: 21,400views have flattened out | not yet at 24h | 9 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
| /643119 Sept 2026, 10:06 UTC | 1420 minutes – 7.7 hours old | 21,300 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 21,100 interp. → 3.0 hours: 21,200 → 6.0 hours: 21,200still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 20 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /642619 Sept 2026, 09:00 UTC | 1620 minutes – 8.7 hours old | 22,100 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 21,587 interp. → 3.0 hours: 22,000 → 6.0 hours: 22,100views have flattened out | not yet at 24h | 20 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
| /642519 Sept 2026, 08:58 UTC | 1622 minutes – 8.8 hours old | 22,100 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 21,800 → 3.0 hours: 22,000 → 6.0 hours: 22,100views have flattened out | not yet at 24h | 22 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
| /642419 Sept 2026, 06:40 UTC | 2025 minutes – 11 hours old | 21,500 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 21,300 → 3.0 hours: 21,400 interp. → 6.0 hours: 21,400views have flattened out | not yet at 24h | 25 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
| /642318 Sept 2026, 07:59 UTC | 4326 minutes – 32 hours old | 21,400 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 21,100 → 3.0 hours: 21,100 → 6.0 hours: 21,100 → 12 hours: 21,200 → 24 hours: 21,300views have flattened out | 21,300measured | 26 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
| /642218 Sept 2026, 07:01 UTC | 4219 minutes – 30 hours old | 21,900 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 21,800 interp. → 3.0 hours: 21,800 interp. → 6.0 hours: 21,800 → 12 hours: 21,900 interp. → 24 hours: 21,900views have flattened out | 21,900measured | 19 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
| /642118 Sept 2026, 06:10 UTC | 444 minutes – 30 hours old | 22,300 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 22,172 interp. → 3.0 hours: 22,200 interp. → 6.0 hours: 22,200 → 12 hours: 22,200 → 24 hours: 22,300views have flattened out | 22,300measured | 4 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Recent posts
#тренды #новости #россия #важное #события #москва
Нейросеть GPT-6 Astra РАСШИФРОВАЛА немецкую радиограмму 1918 года — её не могли прочесть 108 лет. Немцы зашифровали её в конце Первой мировой. Метод перемешивает буквы по таблице и ключевому слову, поэтому текст выглядит как мусор. Называется он ADFGVX. Энтузиаст нашёл шифровку в списке из 50 нерешённых на портале Scienceblogs.de. Ключом оказалось длинное немецкое слово, которое переводится как «передвижение войск»…
Будьте бдительны, появилась новая мошенническая схема! Пушистые негодяи 😍 #тренды #новости #россия #важное #события #москва
Залипаем в чужие ЖИЗНИ — в сети вывели запрос для ютуба, который выдаёт ультраредкие ролики десятилетней давности. Нужно ввести IMG_**** и подставить любые цифры вместо звёздочек. Сайт выдаст старые видосы почти без просмотров. Под такими кодами люди выкладывали дни рождения, праздники, концерты уличных музыкантов, школьные выступления и другие трогательные моменты. Даркнет здорового человека 😊 #тренды #новости #р…
У современных программистов осталась одна радость. Бедные модели 🫠 #тренды #новости #россия #важное #события #москва
Технический директор Apple не переносит ПЛЁНКИ на экранах iPhone — они портят качество дисплея. По мнению инженера, когда люди клеят что-то на экран айфонов, они перечёркивают все старания компании. «Лично у меня, когда я вижу, как кто-то наклеивает защитное стекло на свой iPhone, мурашки по коже, потому что мы так усердно трудимся, чтобы создавать красивые передние панели» Он цены на замену дисплея видел? 😁 #трен…
В restore: уже можно посмотреть и протестировать полную линейку новинок Apple: iPhone 18 Pro, iPhone 18 Pro Max, Apple Watch Series 12, Apple Watch Ultra 4 и AirPods 5. С 19 сентября устройства представлены в семи флагманских магазинах сети, включая магазин на Неглинной, 8/10 в Москве. Выдача предзаказов и продажи стартуют 22 сентября. По предзаказам традиционно лидирует iPhone 18 Pro Max. Самый популярный цвет — B…
Россия — самая КОШАЧЬЯ страна в мире: по статистике, коты есть почти у 60% семей. Шарим 😍 #тренды #новости #россия #важное #события #москва
Самый полезный «лишний» груз, который можно себе представить. Как без такого выходить? 😍 #тренды #новости #россия #важное #события #москва
Гэндальф ВЕРНУЛСЯ — Иэн Маккеллен показал, как будет выглядеть в новом фильме «Властелин Колец: Охота на Голлума». Актёру уже 87 лет. 😁 — каким был, таким остался 😭 — время не щадит никого #тренды #новости #россия #важное #события #москва
⚡️ Россияне будут отдыхать 11 ДНЕЙ на Новый Год — власти разрешили батониться с 31 декабря 2026-го по 10 января 2027-го. Праздник к нам приходит 🎉 #тренды #новости #россия #важное #события #москва
Showing the 12 most recent of 182 posts we hold for @onerussia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@hayzonn · 2,830,164#1
@biznest0n · 672,526#2
@lenvies · 1,562,601#3
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,191,483#4
@vestirussia · 986,059#5
@TonAirDrop_ru · 1,149,354#6
@eeusd · 1,143,369#7
@crypto_gst · 572,551#8
@tlive · 1,738,466#9
@belevskmove · 1,078,890#10
@Crypto_Meteora · 331,101#11
@tons_base · 486,041#12
@CryptoZaryad · 326,766#13
@crypto_jeman · 666,447#14
@crypto_time_old · 133,850#15
@investbar · 227,909#16
@intervtone · 634,517#17
@hamster_perviy · 92,857#18
@blumcrypto · 14,360,001#19
@kripota4 · 701,030#20
@GTM_TON · 848,353#21
@notcoin · 8,643,687#22
@hamster_kombat · 20,982,519#23
@TonAirDrop_EN · 555,745#24
@trendingapps · 3,812,897#25
@Cats_housewtf · 7,949,411#26
@activitylauncher_offical · 4,519,917#27
@givemetonru · 2,089,622#28
@realgoats_channel · 4,674,136#29
@architecton_tech · 2,035,615#30
@TheFootballCity · 267,464#31
@ToNmetasilense · 2,762,588#32
@mr_bitcoin_trade · 148,066#33
@nomis_protocol · 1,549,523#34
@whisper_in_the_night · 1,567,897#35
@ONE_Quest_sub · 3,026,567#36
@RoolzRussia · 1,067,817#37
@catizenann · 3,581,173#38
@mediarussia · 1,694,028#39
@iamalexfalcon · 3,088,378#40
@onus_globalchannel · 1,650,302#41
@hotonnear · 4,675,152#42
@TaskNChannel · 912,667#43
@dogs · 7,065,215#44
@boomloudcoin · 1,671,644#45
@hexnio · 1,998,607#46
@catgoldminerann · 904,797#47
@hash_cats · 2,095,260#48
@theyescoin · 5,697,036#49
@Holdcoin_Channel · 2,182,616#50
@tomarket_ai · 6,657,802#51
@catapult_extreme · 8,500,526#52
@seedupdates · 8,226,508#53
@corn_battles · 1,045,929#54
@gram · 6,689,636#55
@pigscrew · 2,142,006#56
@TimeFarmChannel · 5,296,110#57
@money · 2,974,351#58
@theTapCoins · 2,919,608#59
@tu_crypto_news_en · 664,055#60
@brainscoin · 703,402#61
@fx_holding_community · 6,083,788#62
@rockyrabbitio · 3,502,824#63
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 3,968,612#64
@token_1win · 2,980,801#65
@tonstationgames · 3,193,102#66
@AmioCommunity · 1,747,054#67
@trust_empire_en · 833,373#68
@the_vertus · 2,149,775#69
@dotcoincommunity · 3,977,366#70
@autoruss · 833,622#71
@banana_update · 1,401,181#72
@tapraccooncoin · 176,057#73
@aipost · 704,315#74
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,498,015#75
@okx_campaign_announcements · 1,227,204#76
@pocketfi · 1,799,855#77
@WILD_EC0SYSTEM · 1,084,828#78
@smpl_app · 1,619,786#79
@KongsJungleRoom · 105,908#80
@tapswapai · 10,368,717#81
@cosmobear_io · 759,910#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@hamster_perviy · 92,857
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 August 2026
@BrokeinCrpt · 93,694
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 August 2026
@spintrru · 616,316
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
@astahov_sklad · 22,620
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 20 September 2026
@codycapitalist · 30,116
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 7 September 2026
@wall_jetton · 197,594
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
@Cr1pto_profit · 397,430
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
@lenvies · 1,562,601
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
@Ton_HYDRA_Community · 178,210
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
@CryptoZaryad · 326,766
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
@Crypto_Meteora · 331,101
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
@crypto_way_up · 578,744
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 August 2026
@TonAirDrop_ru · 1,149,354
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
@hayzonn · 2,830,164
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 August 2026
@TraderPain · 258,192
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
@tlive · 1,738,466
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 7 August 2026
@crypto_time_old · 133,850
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
@togetupblud · 202,499
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
@wortyton · 37,169
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 31 August 2026
@CIQ_SKILL · 579,983
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 August 2026
@proton_invest · 59,000
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
@pig_in_crypto · 75,438
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026
@tg_majorka · 84,641
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 August 2026
@BaronTon0 · 875,072
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 222 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тренды России | Новости” (@onerussia), 1,407,516 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onerussia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.