Вау: разработчик воссоздал Римский форум 210 года в виде пиксельного мира, по которому можно ГУЛЯТЬ. На форуме живут 300 маленьких персонажей. Сенат проводит голосование, а в Юлиевой базилике идёт суд. В храме Кастора стоматолог лечит пациента. В 11 зданий можно зайти, а все здания, персонажи и анимации нарисованы кодом на JavaScript. Проект работает прямо в браузере. Гуляем здесь 😍 #тренды #новости #россия #важное…

Channel
Тренды России | Новости
@onerussia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,284,661subscribers
-239,974 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001936387363 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @onerussia |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onerussia |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 33% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 04:19 | 1,284,661 | -3,117 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 03:24 | 1,287,778 | -2,440 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 00:40 | 1,290,218 | -2,576 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 00:27 | 1,292,794 | -2,336 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 03:10 | 1,295,130 | -2,939 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:49 | 1,298,069 | -3,637 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 22:17 | 1,301,706 | -2,552 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 22:30 | 1,304,258 | -3,705 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:50 | 1,307,963 | -2,869 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 18:30 | 1,310,832 | -2,133 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 15:18 | 1,312,965 | -1,782 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 1,314,747 | -2,577 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:40 | 1,317,324 | -1,914 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 1,319,238 | -3,549 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:09 | 1,322,787 | -3,374 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 10:38 | 1,326,161 | -2,775 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 13:10 | 1,328,936 | -2,287 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 13:38 | 1,331,223 | -3,304 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:38 | 1,334,527 | -2,444 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 11:36 | 1,336,971 | first reading |
Engagement
398 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 185 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.57%
- avg views ÷ 1,284,661 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 20,200
- 141 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 141
- of 398 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 398 (3 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 2,851,957 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 12:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1h 37m
- Average length
- 33s
Measured directly from 178 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 142 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 14 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 18 minutes of being posted; a typical post has already reached 98.8% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 99.5% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 21,800 views — 1.70% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 27,600).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /67985 Nov 2026, 11:49 UTC | 35 minutes – 66 minutes old | 23,400 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 23,400 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 5 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /67975 Nov 2026, 10:42 UTC | 58 minutes – 2.2 hours old | 14,600 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 14,600 interp.views have flattened out | not yet at 24h | 8 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
| /67965 Nov 2026, 09:38 UTC | 77 minutes – 3.3 hours old | 15,300 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 15,300 interp. → 3.0 hours: 15,300 interp.views have flattened out | not yet at 24h | 7 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
| /67955 Nov 2026, 05:44 UTC | 1375 seconds – 7.2 hours old | 357 viewsno reaction reading | 60 minutes: 257 interp. → 3.0 hours: 303 → 6.0 hours: 349still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 23 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /67944 Nov 2026, 13:01 UTC | 4114 minutes – 24 hours old | 28,700 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 28,400 interp. → 3.0 hours: 28,500 → 6.0 hours: 28,500 → 12 hours: 28,500 → 24 hours: 28,700views have flattened out | 28,700measured | 14 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
| /67934 Nov 2026, 11:02 UTC | 413 minutes – 24 hours old | 10,500 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 10,377 interp. → 3.0 hours: 10,400 interp. → 6.0 hours: 10,400 interp. → 12 hours: 10,400 → 24 hours: 10,500views have flattened out | 10,500measured | 12 minutes |
| /67924 Nov 2026, 09:34 UTC | 4027 minutes – 24 hours old | 15,800 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 15,700 → 3.0 hours: 15,700 interp. → 6.0 hours: 15,800 → 12 hours: 15,800 → 24 hours: 15,800views have flattened out | 15,800measured | 27 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
| /67914 Nov 2026, 07:42 UTC | 4114 minutes – 24 hours old | 25,200 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 24,800 interp. → 3.0 hours: 25,100 interp. → 6.0 hours: 25,200 → 12 hours: 25,200 → 24 hours: 25,200views have flattened out | 25,200measured | 14 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 141 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
⚡️ Криштиану Роналду объявил о ЗАВЕРШЕНИИ карьеры в сборной Португалии. Ушла эпоха 🌅 #тренды #новости #россия #важное #события #москва
Невозможно: агенты OpenAI нашли 948 уязвимостей В ЯДРЕ LINUX за один запуск. OpenAI собрала автоматическую систему для поиска уязвимостей. Её агенты сами ищут ошибки в коде, проверяют их и пишут эксплойты. Эксплойтом называют программу, которая использует ошибку для взлома. Запуск прошёл в середине октября на ещё не анонсированной модели для кибербезопасности. Весь прогон обошёлся в 1,21 млн долларов на оплату дост…
У выходного посреди недели есть последствия. Дофаминовая яма на следующий день 😶 #тренды #новости #россия #важное #события #москва
В с нынешними ценами на комплектующие можно апргрейдиться только так. Но только осторожно 😶 #тренды #новости #россия #важное #события #москва
Ура: Discord может ПЕРЕСТАТЬ жрать оперативку. По слухам, сервис переписывают с прожорливого Electron на Rust. На изменения намекнул техдир Discord Станислав Вишневский. Если это окажется правдой, Discord сможет работать быстрее и меньше нагружать процессор. Обновление якобы должно выйти уже на этой неделе. #тренды #новости #россия #важное #события #москва
OpenAI начали сотрудничать со стартапом, который ранее ВЗЛОМАЛ Anthropic. OpenAI объявила о партнёрстве с Cathedral для усиления защиты своих продуктов. Команда стартапа будет проверять системы компании с помощью моделей OpenAI. OpenAI также повысит награды за поиск критических уязвимостей более чем в четыре раза. Ранее Cathedral проникли в закрытые системы Anthropic в рамках программы баг-баунти. Стартап утверждае…
Страшный сон любого удалёнщика. Коллеги, проблемы с интернетом, переподключусь 😶 #тренды #новости #россия #важное #события #москва
В Китае нашли лучший небоскрёб в мире — им стало здание штаб-квартиры Sany Irotech в Гуанчжоу. Это две башни высотой 204 метра и 186 метров с необычными внешними конструкциями в виде экзоскелета. Система жестка при сильном ветре, но размягчается при мощном землетрясении. Внутри есть офисы и отель, а также благоустроенные террасы, встречающиеся каждые пять этажей. Они затеняют внутренние помещения и уменьшают солнеч…
С новым годом: в Московской области выпал ПЕРВЫЙ СНЕГ — вскоре он доберётся до столицы. Праздник к нам приходит 😳 #тренды #новости #россия #важное #события #москва
Несколько деталей интерьера, которые скрасят любую обстановку. В целом достаточно телека с приставкой 👍 #тренды #новости #россия #важное #события #москва
Из-за бума ИИ взлетели цены на МАКАК — основатель Palantir вложил $20 млн в огромную ферму приматов. Джо Лонсдейл поддерживает стартап Safer Human Medicine. Компания хочет довести поголовье до 30 000 макак за 20 лет. Начнёт она с 500 животных с азиатских ферм. ИИ помогает учёным быстрее создавать новые лекарства. Перед испытаниями на людях каждое проверяют на животных. Для этого часто берут макак, потому что они би…
Showing the 12 most recent of 398 posts we hold for @onerussia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @onerussia as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 16 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 11 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 24 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@hayzonn · 2,581,167#1
@biznest0n · 623,739#2
@lenvies · 1,426,997#3
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,013,394#4
@vestirussia · 914,529#5
@TonAirDrop_ru · 1,047,077#6
@eeusd · 1,068,175#7
@crypto_gst · 540,632#8
@tlive · 1,587,467#9
@belevskmove · 986,189#10
@Crypto_Meteora · 302,655#11
@tons_base · 454,545#12
@CryptoZaryad · 302,204#13
@crypto_jeman · 625,882#14
@crypto_time_old · 128,844#15
@investbar · 217,439#16
@intervtone · 578,340#17
@hamster_perviy · 88,705#18
@blumcrypto · 12,924,609#19
@kripota4 · 648,225#20
@GTM_TON · 1#21
@notcoin · 7,918,735#22
@hamster_kombat · 19,740,087#23
@TonAirDrop_EN · 510,249#24
@trendingapps · 3,575,361#25
@Cats_housewtf · 7,111,900#26
@activitylauncher_offical · 4,063,752#27
@givemetonru · 1,898,803#28
@realgoats_channel · 4,235,147#29
@architecton_tech · 1,847,855#30
@TheFootballCity · 244,819#31
@ToNmetasilense · 2,466,961#32
@mr_bitcoin_trade · 138,948#33
@nomis_protocol · 1,443,234#34
@whisper_in_the_night · 1,423,816#35
@ONEstore_Official · 2,748,757#36
@RoolzRussia · 990,712#37
@catizenann · 3,332,744#38
@mediarussia · 2,014,092#39
@iamalexfalcon · 2,825,983#40
@onus_globalchannel · 1,516,990#41
@hotonnear · 4,331,107#42
@TaskNChannel · 841,041#43
@dogs · 6,486,690#44
@boomloudcoin · 1,561,769#45
@hexnio · 1,850,409#46
@catgoldminerann · 839,252#47
@hash_cats · 1,922,706#48
@theyescoin · 5,202,390#49
@Holdcoin_Channel · 2,007,369#50
@tomarket_ai · 5,969,692#51
@catapult_extreme · 7,676,696#52
@seedupdates · 7,335,051#53
@corn_battles · 978,214#54
@gram · 6,268,008#55
@pigscrew · 1,953,338#56
@TimeFarmChannel · 4,740,517#57
@money · 2,640,970#58
@theTapCoins · 2,687,731#59
@tu_crypto_news_en · 610,945#60
@brainscoin · 653,509#61
@the_signal_24 · 5,443,758#62
@rockyrabbitio · 3,270,211#63
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 3,583,366#64
@token_1win · 2,798,552#65
@tonstationgames · 2,904,824#66
@AmioCommunity · 1,516,278#67
@trust_empire_en · 776,297#68
@the_vertus · 1,992,532#69
@dotcoincommunity · 3,665,838#70
@autoruss · 745,916#71
@banana_update · 1,300,499#72
@tapraccooncoin · 165,403#73
@aipost · 7,123#74
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,317,819#75
@okx_campaign_announcements · 1,124,830#76
@pocketfi · 1,659,326#77
@WILD_EC0SYSTEM · 1,005,500#78
@smpl_app · 1,510,120#79
@KongsJungleRoom · 99,568#80
@tapswapai · 9,688,844#81
@cosmobear_io · 712,849#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@hamster_perviy · 88,705
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 August 2026
@BrokeinCrpt · 90,756
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 August 2026
@spintrru · 566,498
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
@astahov_sklad · 21,545
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 20 September 2026
@codycapitalist · 29,367
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 7 September 2026
@wall_jetton · 189,848
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
@Cr1pto_profit · 368,121
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
@lenvies · 1,426,997
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
@Ton_HYDRA_Community · 169,463
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
@CryptoZaryad · 302,204
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
@Crypto_Meteora · 302,655
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
@crypto_way_up · 35
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 August 2026
@TonAirDrop_ru · 1,047,077
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
@hayzonn · 2,581,167
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 August 2026
@alenkaontg · 20,752
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 24 September 2026
@TraderPain · 236,472
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
@tlive · 1,587,467
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 7 August 2026
@crypto_time_old · 128,844
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
@togetupblud · 193,673
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
@wortyton · 34,041
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 31 August 2026
@CIQ_SKILL · 537,794
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 August 2026
@proton_invest · 52,499
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
@pig_in_crypto · 69,247
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026
@tg_majorka · 80,044
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 230 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тренды России | Новости” (@onerussia), 1,284,661 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onerussia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.