Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net -10,505. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 109,444–123,101 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 04:47
111,020
-113
4 Nov 2026, 06:20
111,133
-107
3 Nov 2026, 04:19
111,240
-86
2 Nov 2026, 01:48
111,326
-155
1 Nov 2026, 04:08
111,481
-127
31 Oct 2026, 01:39
111,608
-124
30 Oct 2026, 03:49
111,732
-119
29 Oct 2026, 02:35
111,851
-97
28 Oct 2026, 00:19
111,948
-128
26 Oct 2026, 22:06
112,076
-97
25 Oct 2026, 20:34
112,173
-87
24 Oct 2026, 19:51
112,260
-130
23 Oct 2026, 18:29
112,390
-99
22 Oct 2026, 18:59
112,489
-230
21 Oct 2026, 12:16
112,719
-111
20 Oct 2026, 11:39
112,830
-128
19 Oct 2026, 11:56
112,958
-96
18 Oct 2026, 13:28
113,054
-147
17 Oct 2026, 12:28
113,201
-134
16 Oct 2026, 09:40
113,335
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 11 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 185 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.293%
avg views ÷ 111,020 subscribers
Avg views / post
325
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.923%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 October 2026
Posts held
22 (11 January 2025 – 25 October 2026)
Views total
325
Reactions total
3
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 16:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
40
Videos
10
Links
26
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 17s
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
582 reactions across 22 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
183
31.4%
❤
144
24.7%
👍
110
18.9%
👏
42
7.22%
😁
27
4.64%
😱
21
3.61%
👌
10
1.72%
😍
8
1.37%
🤩
8
1.37%
🤔
7
1.20%
❤🔥
6
1.03%
🙈
6
1.03%
🕊
5
0.859%
🤯
5
0.859%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 582 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2025 to 25 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
💎 Auctions - торги коллекционными подарками прямо в Telegram.
Больше не надо искать «где продать свой подарок» и сливать звёзды на ОТС-чаты, в которых 0 пользы.
📉 Цена лота тает на глазах - кто первым нажал, тот и забрал.
🤝 Никто не взял на минимуме? Начинается торг, предлагаете свою цену.
🛡 Подарки хранятся у гаранта @auc_relayer, сделка проходит через него.
Комиссия 5% только после продажи. Покупатель комиссию…
🤝 A collaboration between nest and StarBase
⭐️ StarBase is a new decentralized investment marketplace in Web3!
🔗 Our first partner to integrate the sniping system, and it will become the flagship on the StarBase platform.
🥰 Regards,
nest team!
🇷🇺 Русская версия:
🤝 Коллаборация nest и StarBase
⭐️ StarBase — новый децентрализованный инвестиционный маркетплейс в Web3!
🔗 Наш первый партнер, который интегрирует сн…
🥰 Now, it's easier to find us. We're officially listed on @appss
▶️@appss is your go-to global catalog for discovering Mini Apps, Bots, and Communities on Telegram.
▶️nest store is the most user-friendly Telegram gifts marketplace with low commissions!
Another cool thing: @appss has a "Special Offers" tab packed with fresh perks and generous bonuses from top projects.
🟣Head over to the nest store page on @appss, …
🤑 Hello, nestMUNITY! As we promised - the global update for nest.store is here!
We have added:
▶️ Full automation (no more P2P)
▶️ Auctions
▶️ Shopping cart
▶️ Overall activity on the exchange
▶️ History of your activities
▶️ Automatic withdrawal of funds
▶️ Top-up via TON Connect
▶️ Updated referral system
▶️ Patterns and backgrounds for gifts
The service fee is only 5%, and you also earn 25% from the deals of ea…
🤑 Hello, nestMUNITY!
🤩 As we mentioned earlier, we're about to fully re-build nest.store so we won't be able to relocate any data.
🔤 In light of this information, we need all our users to withdraw their money from nest.store balance. Don't worry, it's just a technical necessity. We will shut down nest.store beta on March 25th until the release of the new update. Stay tuned!
💙 Thank you for your beta-user experienc…
🤑 Paul is back. And we're back too!
We are ready to officially declare that we are in the home stretch!
🫡 The main thing: nest DEX is right now at the final stage of development and will be available to everyone in the near future! (The closed beta of available features is currently underway)
Also, we have heard you and next week we will be ready to show the ultimate version of nest Store! Yes, we have literally c…
🕒Are you still waiting with us?
—————————
🕒Вы все еще ждете вместе с нами?
❤24🔥17👍9😁5
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @nest_dex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Tonex @Tonex_app · 82,447 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 August 2026
Everscale News @everscale_news · 266,212 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
✍🏾 Howard’s Channel @telepeng · 106,455 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 September 2026
GOLDMANN HYDRA Community @Ton_HYDRA_Community · 169,463 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
OOIA - TON NFT Marketplace @ooiaton · 237,160 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
tAppTales @tapptales · 99,186 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 August 2026
Avamuzix @avamuzix · 19,906 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 28 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“nest” (@nest_dex), 111,020 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nest_dex.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.