Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 90 days, net -6,925. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 96,668–110,489 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 17:00
101,969
-297
4 Nov 2026, 16:46
102,266
-294
3 Nov 2026, 16:06
102,560
-125
2 Nov 2026, 13:09
102,685
-82
1 Nov 2026, 16:34
102,767
-516
31 Oct 2026, 13:56
103,283
+2,293
30 Oct 2026, 13:46
100,990
-1,691
29 Oct 2026, 12:56
102,681
-494
28 Oct 2026, 10:49
103,175
-389
27 Oct 2026, 10:37
103,564
-280
26 Oct 2026, 13:54
103,844
+2,150
25 Oct 2026, 11:50
101,694
-384
24 Oct 2026, 09:15
102,078
-542
23 Oct 2026, 09:44
102,620
+758
22 Oct 2026, 06:09
101,862
-725
20 Oct 2026, 23:27
102,587
-488
19 Oct 2026, 21:36
103,075
+2,263
18 Oct 2026, 19:26
100,812
-390
17 Oct 2026, 21:14
101,202
-342
17 Oct 2026, 00:28
101,544
first reading
Engagement
50 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 185 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.5%
avg views ÷ 101,969 subscribers
Avg views / post
30,100
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 50 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
50 (8 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
390,760
Reactions total
13,028
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 05:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
594
Videos
174
Links
66
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
4m 37s
Average length
46s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
49,883 reactions across 50 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
17,105
34.3%
🔥
16,215
32.5%
👍
15,914
31.9%
❤🔥
314
0.629%
😍
124
0.249%
🥰
69
0.138%
💯
58
0.116%
👏
28
0.056%
🤩
19
0.038%
💋
18
0.036%
⚡
4
0.008%
🍓
4
0.008%
🕊
4
0.008%
😁
3
0.006%
👎
2
0.004%
🙏
2
0.004%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49,883 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
2.00%
1 of 50 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
41,000
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
41,000
over 49 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqxGkzg3
1
26 August 2026
26 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Когда платье становится произведением искусства
В 1937 году дизайнер Эльза Скиапарелли создала одно из самых необычных вечерних платьев в истории моды. И помог ей в этом Сальвадор Дали.
На белом платье из шелковой органзы появился крупный красный омар - рисунок, придуманный самим художником. Для того времени это было довольно смелое решение: вместо привычной вышивки и цветочных мотивов на вечернем наряде оказалось …
Меня часто спрашивают, как стать более женственной и уверенной в себе.
Я думаю, что уверенность начинается не только с того, как мы выглядим, но и с того, как ощущаем себя в собственном теле.
Когда ты регулярно тренируешься, замечаешь, что становишься сильнее, выносливее, осваиваешь то, что раньше казалось сложным, меняется и отношение к себе.
Для меня спорт - это не только про фигуру. Это про дисциплину, здоровье…
Женщина, которая сама создала свой образ. Тамара де Лемпицкая.
В искусстве ар-деко есть имя, которое невозможно спутать с другими. Тамара де Лемпицкая - польская художница, ставшая одной из самых ярких фигур парижской художественной жизни 1920-х годов.
Ее картины легко узнать: четкие линии, выразительные лица, геометричные формы, роскошные ткани и женщины, которые смотрят на зрителя с удивительной уверенностью.
Од…
Хочу посоветовать фильм «Запределье» Тарсема Сингха. Возможно, кто-то его уже видел, но мне кажется, он заслуживает гораздо большего внимания.
История начинается в больнице Лос-Анджелеса в 1915 году. Каскадер Рой знакомится с маленькой девочкой Александрией и начинает рассказывать ей фантастическую историю о героях, приключениях и невероятных мирах.
Постепенно граница между реальностью и вымыслом становится все мен…
Когда Голливуд начал переходить от черно-белого кино к цветному, оказалось, что привычный макияж актрис на экране выглядит совсем иначе.
В 1930-е годы цветное кино требовало новых решений. Косметика, которая хорошо смотрелась при обычном освещении, могла совершенно иначе выглядеть на пленке. А мощные студийные лампы делали съемки еще сложнее.
Именно тогда за кулисами Голливуда развернулась настоящая борьба за идеал…
Болеро - один из самых чувственных танцев бальной программы
Но интереснее всего в нем не медленный темп, а то, как много выразительности можно передать почти незаметным движением)
Современный бальный болеро входит в американскую программу Rhythm вместе с ча-ча-ча, румбой, свингом и мамбо. В нем соединяются характерная для латиноамериканских танцев работа корпуса и мягкое движение с подъемами и опусканиями, напомина…
Мне кажется, Тупак - один из тех артистов, которых интересно открывать заново. Поэтому сегодня хочу поделиться одной историей о нем.
В начале 1990-х журналистка Нина Бхадрешвар отправила Тупаку журнал, в котором писала о социальных проблемах и культуре. Он заинтересовался ее работой и сам позвонил ей. Так началось их общение, которое продолжилось в письмах.
Они обсуждали книги, творчество и то, что происходило в об…
В последнее время стараюсь каждый день находить хотя бы несколько минут для себя. Без телефона, музыки и каких-либо задач. Просто немного тишины и дыхания.
Не всегда получается, но даже короткая медитация помогает переключиться и немного выдохнуть.
А вы медитируете? Или у вас есть свои способы переключиться после насыщенного дня? Рассказывайте 🤍
У каждого камня есть своя история, характер и символика. Сегодня хочу рассказать о трех, которые мне особенно интересны)
Аметист 💜
Фиолетовый кварц, который в символике камней связывают со спокойствием, ясностью мыслей и внутренним равновесием. Его часто выбирают в периоды, когда хочется немного замедлиться, собраться с мыслями и вернуть ощущение баланса.
Тигровый глаз 🤎
Золотисто-коричневый камень с красивыми пе…
Много отзывов я слышала от своих подруг об этом месте и в итоге настойчиво решила найти неделю для себя.
Санаторий «Истокъ». Максимально честное мнение, с маленьким «но» :)
Санаторий просто потрясающий. Персонал вежливый, кухня очень вкусная и разнообразная, аппараты по всем направлениям передовые, и их количество просто поражает. Доктора - суперпрофессионалы, номера большие и уютные. Есть еще старинные, если вам б…
❤340👍317🔥311🥰5
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @Maria_Melnikova23. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @Maria_Melnikova23 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
1 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
1 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
19 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Вебер Говорит @vebergovorit · 19,707 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 28 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Maryme.23” (@Maria_Melnikova23), 101,969 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Maria_Melnikova23.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.