π π π π π₯π₯

Channel
Master King ππ
@MasterKingTips
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
35,957subscribers
+693 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 31,623β100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001694917338 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MasterKingTips |
| Description | Daily Sure shot master king tips π₯π₯π₯ FOR 4+ODDS SURE ROLLOVER BET JOIN β β ππ https://t.me/+Ti198YbigZE4Y2I1 https://t.me/+Ti198YbigZE4Y2I1 VIP Contact : @Ander_70 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MasterKingTips |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 35,957 | +80 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 35,877 | +54 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 35,823 | +62 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 35,761 | +93 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 35,668 | +36 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 35,632 | +59 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 35,573 | +80 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:37 | 35,493 | +39 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 35,454 | +33 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 35,421 | +58 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:51 | 35,363 | +34 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 35,329 | +33 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 35,296 | +29 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 35,267 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 35,264 | first reading |
Engagement
197 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 5.71%
- avg views Γ· 35,957 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,050
- 197 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.54%
- reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
- Posts in window
- 197
- of 197 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 177 of 197 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 197 (6 August 2026 β 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 404,248 |
| Reactions total | 5,676 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- β6,100
- Videos
- β1,990
- Links
- β193
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 22 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 5s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
5,676 reactions across 175 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 2,599 | 45.8% | |
| π₯ | 1,345 | 23.7% | |
| π― | 1,242 | 21.9% | |
| π₯° | 490 | 8.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 177 of the 197 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 5,676reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 197 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
β β FREE TIPS β β BET ODDS :- 1.53 βοΈβοΈ VIP JOIN β @Ander_70
β€15π₯10π₯°9π―4
β β FREE TIPS β β BET ODDS :- 1.43 βοΈβοΈ VIP JOIN β @Ander_70
β€16π₯10π₯°8π―3
β β FREE TIPS β β BET ODDS :- 1.76 βοΈβοΈ VIP JOIN β @Ander_70
β€15π₯°8π₯7π―5
Sticker, posted without a caption
β β Master King Vip π₯π₯ π₯ AUGUST VIP PROVED π₯ (01)-----(5.89)------won β β (01)-----(4.36)------won β β (02)-----(5.97)------won β β (02)-----(5.04)------won β β (03)-----(3.96)------Lossββ (03)-----(3.02)------Lossββ (04)-----(3.54)------Lossββ (04)-----(4.26)------won β β (05)-----(6.77)------won β β (05)-----(5.25)------won β β (06)-----(3.42)------won β β (06)-----(5 73)------won β β (07)-----(3.38)------Lossββ (07β¦
β€16π―10π₯8
VIP WON β β β β 2ND VIP βοΈβοΈ ODDS :- 4.985 βοΈβοΈ Congratulations for VIP clients β Always bast profit β β Premium VIP Contact ππ VIP :- π @Ander_70
β€10π―8π₯7π₯°1
Photo, posted without a caption
β€8π₯8π―7π₯°1
2οΈβ£π€π€βοΈβοΈπ€π€π€βοΈβοΈβοΈ
β€3
Photo, posted without a caption
β€8π―8π₯8π₯°1
1ST VIP LOSS β β
β€9π―7π₯7π₯°1
βοΈβοΈ 1οΈβ£π π π π π βοΈβοΈ
Showing the 12 most recent of 197 posts we hold for @MasterKingTips. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank β 772,776 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Strattonfootballaction Β· 66,185
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here β alongside 82 others β read 21 August 2026
@footballinsight01 Β· 91,426
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here β alongside 85 others β read 17 August 2026
@uzxvsvgsdsy1999 Β· 84,470
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here β alongside 86 others β read 18 August 2026
@safe_predictions Β· 60,888
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here β alongside 83 others β read 22 August 2026
@fbcoddes Β· 66,105
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here β alongside 84 others β read 21 August 2026
@loyaltipsoffical Β· 204,571
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 85 here β alongside 84 others β read 12 August 2026
@neymarfixed Β· 80,866
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here β alongside 86 others β read 18 August 2026
@solovibe_4TED Β· 111,451
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 72 here β alongside 71 others β read 14 August 2026
@Xmatches Β· 65,573
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 87 here β alongside 86 others β read 21 August 2026
@BETORG Β· 110,060
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 82 here β alongside 81 others β read 14 August 2026
@PROJECT2026G Β· 84,968
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 81 here β alongside 80 others β read 18 August 2026
@betwinkeofficial Β· 94,468
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 78 here β alongside 77 others β read 16 August 2026
@Daily375 Β· 199,574
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 80 here β alongside 79 others β read 12 August 2026
@aimbetofficial Β· 225,663
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 83 here β alongside 82 others β read 12 August 2026
@Cristian_iinfo_79 Β· 108,101
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 87 here β alongside 86 others β read 14 August 2026
@Ardaninfo Β· 105,569
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 82 here β alongside 81 others β read 14 August 2026
@fixedmatch_Team Β· 64,429
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 81 here β alongside 80 others β read 21 August 2026
@highscorechannel Β· 74,570
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 85 here β alongside 84 others β read 19 August 2026
@xbetcouponsgratuitt Β· 166,439
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 69 here β alongside 68 others β read 12 August 2026
@KAYBET_ULTRA_PRONO Β· 122,880
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 70 here β alongside 69 others β read 13 August 2026
@GRACEODDS225 Β· 188,302
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 75 here β alongside 74 others β read 12 August 2026
@BETPRONO_OFFICIEL Β· 98,134
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 75 here β alongside 74 others β read 16 August 2026
@sdysteme10 Β· 87,823
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 65 here β alongside 64 others β read 17 August 2026
@predictoggg Β· 60,306
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 79 here β alongside 78 others β read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βMaster King ππβ (@MasterKingTips), 35,957 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MasterKingTips.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.