Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for πŸ€ NBA GOD | FREE TIPS

Channel

πŸ€ NBA GOD | FREE TIPS

@NBAGODTips

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Posts edited after publishing Β· Polls Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

30,364subscribers

+2,052 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001873619617
TypeChannel
Username@NBAGODTips
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/NBAGODTips

Growth

28,31230,36429,3387 August 2026 β€” 28,312 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 28,312 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 28,421 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 28,473 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 28,493 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 28,475 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 28,476 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 28,728 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 29,173 subscribers15 August 2026 β€” 29,691 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 29,947 subscribers18 August 2026 β€” 30,055 subscribers19 August 2026 β€” 30,048 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 30,131 subscribers21 August 2026 β€” 30,225 subscribers22 August 2026 β€” 30,364 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 15 days, net +2,052. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,004–30,672 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 16:2830,364+139
21 Aug 2026, 08:1230,225+94
20 Aug 2026, 09:5330,131+83
19 Aug 2026, 11:1730,048-7
18 Aug 2026, 14:4730,055+108
17 Aug 2026, 11:1629,947+256
15 Aug 2026, 20:3529,691+518
14 Aug 2026, 14:0729,173+445
13 Aug 2026, 04:3328,728+252
12 Aug 2026, 02:2228,476+1
10 Aug 2026, 23:1228,475-18
9 Aug 2026, 23:3428,493+20
8 Aug 2026, 20:2428,473+52
7 Aug 2026, 20:2228,421+109
7 Aug 2026, 09:4528,312no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:3628,312first reading

Engagement

118 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
5.31%
avg views Γ· 30,364 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,610
118 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.16%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
118
of 118 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held118 (5 August 2026 – 22 August 2026)
Views total190,174
Reactions total2,207
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,207 reactions across 118 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ†76634.7%
❀51323.2%
❀‍πŸ”₯27912.6%
πŸ‘27712.6%
πŸ‘1999.02%
πŸ”₯873.94%
🀝492.22%
😍130.589%
🍾100.453%
⚑40.181%
✍30.136%
🫑30.136%
πŸŽ‰20.091%
😎20.091%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 118 of the 118 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 2,207reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 118 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 118 we hold a reading for Β· 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β€” bought with money β€” on a post by @NBAGODTips. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 118 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 01:33 UTC495 views19 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

As for Fritz, I think he played better for most of the match. He had the advantage in the first set as well, even though he ended up losing it. He managed to win the second set, and then in the third set he even had a break. The odds on Nakashima were already around 13.00, and then suddenly Fritz gave away two of his own service games. I honestly don’t know what happened or why the match turned around so badly for hi…

❀13πŸ†2πŸ‘2🫑2

21 Aug 2026, 20:07 UTC881 views11 reactionsread 22 August 2026

πŸ”₯ All my picks are taken directly from 22BET & BetLabel! πŸ† They have one of the biggest selections on the market, so you can find almost every event posted on other Telegram channels there too!

❀4πŸ†4πŸ‘2❀‍πŸ”₯1

21 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC918 views10 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

πŸ‘‘ GET 1 MONTH OF VIP FOR FREE! πŸ‘‘ How to join: 1️⃣ Register through one of the links 2️⃣ Deposit €20+ 3️⃣ Get 1 MONTH OF VIP - FOR FREE! πŸ”₯ 🎰 22BET - REGISTER HERE 🎰 BETLABEL - REGISTER HERE πŸ“© Questions? DM me - @Mateusz_DFG

πŸ‘5❀‍πŸ”₯3πŸ†2

21 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTCβ‰ˆ1,310 views22 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🎯 Value Analysis Taylor Fritz comes into this matchup with a clear advantage, especially given his experience in big matches and his ability to handle pressure on hard courts. Playing in Cincinnati also gives him a familiar environment where his aggressive first-strike tennis can be particularly effective. Nakashima deserves respect for his current form and confidence, but this is a significant step up in opposition…

πŸ†12❀5πŸ‘3πŸ‘2

21 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTCβ‰ˆ1,260 views11 reactionsread 22 August 2026

πŸ†More bets available on VIP groupπŸ‘‡ πŸ’³ Pay securely here βœ‰οΈOr text me to join!πŸ‘‡ ⭐️ @NBAGODX

πŸ†6❀3πŸ‘1🀝1

21 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTCβ‰ˆ1,260 views23 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🎾 Fritz to win πŸ’° Stake: Normal Stake (1u) πŸ“Š Odds: 1.59 βž– πŸ”— Channel Link - t.me/NBAGODTips 🎰 Ticket Link - REGISTER HERE πŸ’³ VIP Shop - Pay securely here

❀15πŸ†5πŸ‘2πŸ‘1

21 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTCβ‰ˆ1,330 views26 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🀐60 days to start the NBA πŸ€

πŸ†14πŸ‘8❀‍πŸ”₯4

21 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTCβ‰ˆ1,390 views24 reactionsread 22 August 2026

β˜€οΈ GOOD MORNING, EVERYONE! πŸ€πŸ”₯ Welcome to a new day in the group! πŸ’ͺ Hope you’re all ready for another day of WNBA & tennis action! πŸŽΎπŸ€ Let’s stay focused, trust the process and look for the best opportunities! πŸ“ˆπŸ’°

❀14πŸ†6πŸ‘4

21 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTCβ‰ˆ1,370 views14 reactionsread 22 August 2026

πŸ‘‰ Join the NBA GOD VIP now and start winning with us! πŸ”— VIP Access - Pay securely here πŸ“© Or DM me directly β†’ @NBAGODX

πŸ‘6❀‍πŸ”₯3πŸ†3❀2

21 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTCβ‰ˆ1,360 views13 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

πŸ“Š VIP Recap - 20.08 βœ…βš½οΈ Tan Siu Lin Women -2.5 handicap βž–πŸŽΎ Papoe to win βœ…πŸŽΎ Over 22.5 Games βœ…πŸŽΎ Poullain to win βœ…πŸŽΎ Over 21.5 Games πŸ”„πŸŽΎ Rybakina +3.5 games 4 Wins βœ… 1 Losses ❌ 1 Void πŸ”„

πŸ†5❀‍πŸ”₯3πŸ‘3❀2

20 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTCβ‰ˆ1,360 views12 reactionsread 22 August 2026

πŸ”₯ All my picks are taken directly from 22BET & BetLabel! πŸ† They have one of the biggest selections on the market, so you can find almost every event posted on other Telegram channels there too!

❀6πŸ†4πŸ‘2

20 Aug 2026, 21:44 UTCβ‰ˆ1,380 views12 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

πŸ‘‘ GET 1 MONTH OF VIP FOR FREE! πŸ‘‘ How to join: 1️⃣ Register through one of the links 2️⃣ Deposit €20+ 3️⃣ Get 1 MONTH OF VIP - FOR FREE! πŸ”₯ 🎰 22BET - REGISTER HERE 🎰 BETLABEL - REGISTER HERE πŸ“© Questions? DM me - @Mateusz_DFG

πŸ†6❀5πŸ‘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 118 posts we hold for @NBAGODTips. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@NBAGODTips edited 10 posts after it first published β€” the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β€” this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
7 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTCAnonymous Poll263 voters

πŸ“Š How long have you been following the channel?

  1. πŸ†• Less than a week8%
  2. πŸ“… 1-2 weeks9%
  3. πŸ—“οΈ 2-4 weeks6%
  4. πŸ“† 1-3 months13%
  5. ⏳ 3-6 months12%
  6. πŸ•’ 3-6 months11%
  7. πŸ† More than 1 year51%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTCAnonymous Poll232 voters

πŸ† ATP MONTREAL FINAL 🎾

  1. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Ben Shelton78%
  2. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Brandon Nakashima23%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only β€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 118 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ARDAN INFO
@Ardaninfo Β· 105,569
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here β€” alongside 81 others β€” read 14 August 2026
😈Freak Bets😈
@freakbets Β· 131,915
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here β€” alongside 84 others β€” read 13 August 2026
Responsible BettingπŸ’°πŸ”₯
@uzxvsvgsdsy1999 Β· 84,470
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here β€” alongside 86 others β€” read 18 August 2026
BestChamp - Sport Analysis
@bestchamp_free Β· 96,552
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 77 here β€” alongside 76 others β€” read 15 August 2026
SAFE BETTING TIPS
@safe_predictions Β· 60,888
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here β€” alongside 83 others β€” read 22 August 2026
Trick Picks Free
@trickpicksfree Β· 99,121
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 76 here β€” alongside 75 others β€” read 16 August 2026
Predicto Bets | Football Bets & Predictions βš½οΈπŸ†
@predictoggg Β· 60,306
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 79 here β€” alongside 78 others β€” read 22 August 2026
π—™π—’π—’π—§π—•π—”π—Ÿπ—Ÿ π—”π—–π—§π—œπ—’π—‘ [πŸ†]
@Strattonfootballaction Β· 66,185
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 83 here β€” alongside 82 others β€” read 21 August 2026
Magic Betting Tips
@footballinsight01 Β· 91,426
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 86 here β€” alongside 85 others β€” read 17 August 2026
Aim Bet
@aimbetofficial Β· 225,663
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 83 here β€” alongside 82 others β€” read 12 August 2026
πŸŽ– Pronostics Football 365 πŸ‡«πŸ‡·
@pronostics_football_365 Β· 92,109
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 76 here β€” alongside 75 others β€” read 17 August 2026
Fixed game neymarπŸ†
@neymarfixed Β· 80,866
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 87 here β€” alongside 86 others β€” read 18 August 2026
Cristian info
@Cristian_iinfo_79 Β· 108,101
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 87 here β€” alongside 86 others β€” read 14 August 2026
High Score
@highscorechannel Β· 74,570
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 85 here β€” alongside 84 others β€” read 19 August 2026
Bet36_bet365 uk
@bet365_betting_Tips1 Β· 75,965
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 85 here β€” alongside 84 others β€” read 19 August 2026
Private Matches
@Private_matches Β· 114,425
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 85 here β€” alongside 84 others β€” read 14 August 2026
ALEX INFOS
@ALEXINOSS Β· 1,740,083
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 90 here β€” alongside 89 others β€” read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπŸ€ NBA GOD | FREE TIPS” (@NBAGODTips), 30,364 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NBAGODTips.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.