๐ช๐บBet Of The Day๐ช๐บ MELBET๐ซก - HERE ๐ฒTake your deposit bonus 130$+ using the promocode: FREAKBETS๐จ
โคโ๐ฅ86โค15๐14๐ฅ9๐คฏ6๐3

Channel
@freakbets
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Posts edited after publishing ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
136,783subscribers
+3,436 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 100,000โ316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001462147774 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @freakbets |
| Description | Top #1 Rated Betting Channel in Europe since 2019๐ Freakbets APP๐๐ผ @freakbets_bot Invite your friends - https://t.me/+2dwTrOrjN_JjN2Q0 Members speak for usโก๏ธ @freakbetsreview |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/freakbets |
Gambling & betting โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 17:57 | 136,783 | +3,031 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 133,752 | +1,376 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 132,376 | +95 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 132,281 | +60 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:22 | 132,221 | +128 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 132,093 | +348 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 131,745 | +139 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:42 | 131,606 | -174 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:54 | 131,780 | +19 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 131,761 | +35 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:54 | 131,726 | +81 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 131,645 | +29 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 131,616 | -14 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 131,630 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 131,638 | -72 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 131,710 | +24 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 131,686 | -10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 131,696 | -12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 131,708 | -111 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 131,819 | first reading |
896 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 125 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 896 (4 August 2026 โ 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 4,202,190 |
| Reactions total | 60,852 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 11:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 6 October 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
116,672 reactions across 881 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 71,784 | 61.5% | |
| ๐ฅ | 11,326 | 9.71% | |
| ๐ | 7,936 | 6.80% | |
| ๐ | 5,998 | 5.14% | |
| ๐คฏ | 5,721 | 4.90% | |
| ๐ | 3,965 | 3.40% | |
| ๐ | 2,959 | 2.54% | |
| ๐ | 2,304 | 1.97% | |
| ๐ | 2,149 | 1.84% | |
| ๐พ | 901 | 0.772% | |
| โ | 620 | 0.531% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 551 | 0.472% | |
| โก | 458 | 0.393% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 895 of the 896 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 118,091 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 896 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @freakbets. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 896 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 6 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
๐ช๐บBet Of The Day๐ช๐บ MELBET๐ซก - HERE ๐ฒTake your deposit bonus 130$+ using the promocode: FREAKBETS๐จ
โคโ๐ฅ86โค15๐14๐ฅ9๐คฏ6๐3
What a day coming up to close Nations League phase๐ช๐บ Ready for BET OF THE DAY?๐จ
โค57๐ฅ17๐6โก1๐1๐1
GOOD MORNING FREAKS!โ๏ธ Main Channel Highlights๐จ โ 1.75 Strong Bet Elite VIP Highlights๐ฒ โ 1.97 โ 1.78 โ 1.54 Tonight the Nations League window closes with a BANG:๐๐ฅ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟEngland ๐ Czechia ๐จ๐ฟ ๐ญ๐ทCroatia ๐ Spain ๐ช๐ธ ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟScotland ๐ Slovenia๐ธ๐ฎ ๐จ๐ญSwitzerland ๐ North Macedonia ๐ฒ๐ฐ Turn on your notifications and let's get started on this Tuesday!๐ GET ELITE VIP @freakbets_bot
๐46โค21๐พ5
Bet Of The Day Pushโป๏ธโป๏ธโป๏ธ
โค73๐11โ6๐5
โ โ โ โ SINGLE BET WON Congratulations VIP Members!๐
โค38๐7๐4
โ โ โ โ STRONG BET SMASHED๐ฅ
โค47๐13๐ฅ10๐คฏ6โ2
NO COMMENT HERE๐ฅ ๐ซ๐ท4๏ธโฃ๐1๏ธโฃ๐ง๐ช
โค104๐คฏ29๐12๐7๐ฅ3๐1
๐ INVITE GIVEAWAY: WINNERS PAID โ $300 sent to our top 3 inviters: ๐ฅ Yasar: $150 ๐ฅ FX Pro: $100 ๐ฅ Makinwa: $50 Every invite was checked and cheaters were disqualified, so only real invites counted. Congrats to the winners, and thanks to everyone who invited friends! The next round is coming soon ๐ CHECK WINNERS
๐23โค11
WHAT A COMEBACK 2:1 ๐ซ๐ท๐ซ๐ท
โค46๐คฏ16๐5
โ โ โ โ SINGLE BET WON Congratulations VIP Members!๐
โค39๐ฅ12๐6๐3๐1
โ โ โ โ STRONG BET WON Congratulations VIP Members!๐
โค74๐12๐7๐3
STRONG BET FROM FREAKBETS๐ช๐บ BETโก๏ธ FRANCE๐ซ๐ท -1 HANDICAP
โค135โ30๐ฅ20๐13๐คฏ10๐6โก3๐3
Showing the 12 most recent of 896 posts we hold for @freakbets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@freakbets edited 2 posts after it first published โ the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too โ this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 6 most recent of 27 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
2 BIG GAMES๐ช๐บ We are preparing STRONG BET, but you have to choose for which game๐
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Which one you are watching today?
The shares total 139%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Ready for BET OF THE DAY?๐ฅ
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Ready for BET OF THE DAY?๐ฒ
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Will he do it?
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Ready for BET OF THE DAY?๐ฒ
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 896 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegramโs own answer, not this registerโs. When this register asks Telegramโs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegramโs recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 142 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐Freak Bets๐โ (@freakbets), 136,783 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/freakbets.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.