Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -629. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 81,615–82,561 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 23:41
81,808
+14
16 Sept 2026, 15:36
81,794
+66
14 Sept 2026, 16:20
81,728
+4
13 Sept 2026, 03:17
81,724
-86
11 Sept 2026, 01:22
81,810
-92
8 Sept 2026, 03:56
81,902
-188
5 Sept 2026, 01:41
82,090
-41
3 Sept 2026, 10:42
82,131
+21
2 Sept 2026, 04:07
82,110
+2
1 Sept 2026, 03:57
82,108
-41
31 Aug 2026, 02:14
82,149
+15
29 Aug 2026, 23:04
82,134
+38
28 Aug 2026, 22:58
82,096
+13
27 Aug 2026, 22:24
82,083
+5
26 Aug 2026, 22:32
82,078
+7
26 Aug 2026, 01:14
82,071
-23
25 Aug 2026, 02:07
82,094
-28
23 Aug 2026, 13:53
82,122
-18
21 Aug 2026, 22:17
82,140
-4
20 Aug 2026, 17:48
82,144
first reading
Engagement
385 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.97%
avg views ÷ 81,808 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,610
219 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.232%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
221
of 385 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 136 of 219 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
385 (6 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
352,119
Reactions total
552
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 11:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,990
Videos
≈638
Links
≈1,680
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 39m
Average length
1m 21s
Measured directly from 118 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
791 reactions across 219 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
594
75.1%
👍
115
14.5%
🔥
43
5.44%
💯
17
2.15%
✍
6
0.759%
🆒
6
0.759%
😎
4
0.506%
🤪
4
0.506%
👎
2
0.253%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 233 of the 385 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 791 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 385 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 383 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MemoNeet_NCERT. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 385 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📍Today's topics
🧬 Biology — [2.2 Kingdom Protista]
⚗️ Chemistry — [5.2 Applications]
⚛️ Physics — [4.5 Newton's Second Law of Motion ]
━━━━━━━━━━
Today's task: (Content Will be Shared at 6:30 PM)
1️⃣ Watch the 1.5 min concept video (below)
2️⃣ Read the important points (below)
3️⃣ Solve questions on the same topic —FREE in the app (Install App Mandatory)
4️⃣ Send your self-analysis screenshot
👋 New here?
🤝 Welcome to the Daily Revision Challenge
Start with this.
Read once. Takes 30 seconds.
━━━━━━━━━━
What this is
Every day you get 3 topics — one each from Physics, Chemistry and Biology. You revise them, practise questions, and submit your progress.
That's it. Around 15–20 minutes a day.
━━━━━━━━━━
Your daily task — 4 steps
1️⃣ Watch the concept video
1.5 minutes per subject. Posted here every da…
Special Offer
On Student Demand
Only for 5 Students
Before Mid Night
Target 680+ plan + Brahmastra Test Series
94% ReNEET Match
Get Flat Rs 2k Discount
Same Plan What Was Being Used By NEET 2026 Toppers
To Grab It Now In Special Offer
Text Us On @MemoNeet_Support
⏰ 65 minutes left.
Still doable. One topic is enough — start with Biology.
15 minutes 3 topics revision, screenshot, done.
Note: Beta, If You are lazy and don't want to do then I will not continue from tomorrow
📸 How to send your screenshot — 10 seconds
[Make sure to submit before 10PM then only tomorrow topic we will be able to continue]
Today's topics:
🧬 Biology — Intro & 2.1
⚗️ Chemistry — Intro & 5.1
⚛️ Physics — 4.4
App → Self Analysis → screenshot of today's topic → send here
That's it. 👉app link if you don't have yet installed [ https://go-memoneet.web.app?code=y2ikuhm ]
Once Done Then Share Your All 3 Subjects Screen Shot Of Self Analysis here,
See here Self Analysis Given Click on That You will see your Topic Wise Report send screen shot to maintain today's Streak
Note : If after putting so much effort & all guidance, you all are not doing then Will Not Continue this
Physics
Topic
4.4
Concept Building: First 3 Questions
Assertion Reason: First 2 Questions
Ncert Exemplar: Only first Question
Ncert Exercise: Only first 2 Questions
Chemistry
Topic
Introduction Practice First 4 Questions
Topic
5.1
Subtopic
5.1.1 Practice first 4 Question
5.1.2 Practice Only first question
5.1.3 Practice First 2 Questions
5.1.4 Practice First 6 Questions
Biology
Topic
Introduction & Classification
Subtopic
Introduction practice First 9 Questions
Classification practice First 4 Questions
Topic
2.1 Kingdom Minera
Subtopic
2.1.1 Practice First 4 Questions
2.1.2 Practice First 2 Questions
2.1.3 Practice First 11 Questions
Signed MemoNeet Official
Showing the 12 most recent of 385 posts we hold for @MemoNeet_NCERT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@MemoNeet_NCERT edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
22 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 September 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
AuraMode ka 2 Topics study / 10 min break timing kaisa lagta hai?
Perfect, ekdum sahi hai 👍35%
Thoda lamba karo (40–45 min study)43%
Thoda chhota karo (20–25 min study)11%
Let me set my own timing11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 385 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Biologyway NEET Mock Test (Topicwise) @biologyway · 28,091 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 10 September 2026
Deepak AIIMSonian @deepakaiimsonian · 26,157 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 12 September 2026
Pankaj Sir Chemistry Pscaa @Pankaj_Sir_Chemistry_PSCAA · 36,561 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 1 September 2026
NEET ASPIRANTS ✨ @NeetAspirentsOrg · 27,535 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 12 September 2026
NEET Ki Duniya @pw_yakeendropper · 175,646 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 12 August 2026
Dr. Parth Goyal Official @parthneet · 135,735 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 20 September 2026
Dr. Rakshita Singh🐝 @drrakshitasingh · 175,768 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 12 August 2026
Medico Om Official 💉 @medicoom · 22,656 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 20 September 2026
Wassim Bhat Chemistry - official @wassimsirchem · 35,539 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 2 September 2026
Physics Wallah Neet Jee @Physics_Wallah_Neet_Jee · 44,750 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 27 August 2026
AiimsonianARS @aiimsonianARS · 96,918 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 15 August 2026
PW Vidyapeeth - NEET Dropper @Pwvidyapeethneetdropper · 24,769 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 15 September 2026
NEET BIOLOGY - DR. NK SHARMA @mibdrnksharma · 32,448 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 4 September 2026
🌟The Apron Boy🌟 @TheApronBoy · 88,703 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 17 August 2026
Biology Short Notes NEET @biology_short_notes_neet · 45,812 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 27 August 2026
Ekta soni official (ESarmy) @Ektasoni18 · 39,538 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 30 August 2026
Gaurav Gupta NEET Physics (GG Sir) | NOTES, LECTURES, DPPS @Gaurav_sir_Physics · 28,715 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 9 September 2026
Avinash Sharma @Heyavinash2022 · 46,729 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 26 August 2026
Biology at Ease @renuka_biologyatease · 151,134 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 12 August 2026
(QS) Quality Speaks KOTA @qualityspeaks2 · 35,213 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 2 September 2026
ALLEN NEET Official 🩺 @ALLENNEETOfficial · 182,167 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 11 August 2026
NEET Wallah @neetwallahpw · 356,816 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 11 August 2026
ALLEN Career Institute @allencareerinstitute_official · 31,266 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 6 September 2026
Dr Gargi Singh NEET @drgargisingh · 35,756 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 42 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MemoNeet - Daily NEET 2027 PCB Bytes” (@MemoNeet_NCERT), 81,808 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MemoNeet_NCERT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.