Reality: NEET main selection MCQ practice & Testing se hota hai..Students join following to CRACK NEET:
1. Online MCQ Practice & Testing Courses
2. Classroom Test Series in 340+ Centers
10,000 students have taken admissions in GMCs using these courses.
Created
Between 1 April 2016 and 30 November 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
43 measurements spanning 73 days, net -5,075. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 92,347–98,944 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Oct 2026, 20:46
93,108
-73
17 Oct 2026, 18:39
93,181
-47
16 Oct 2026, 19:19
93,228
-53
15 Oct 2026, 21:29
93,281
-63
14 Oct 2026, 22:55
93,344
-113
13 Oct 2026, 13:28
93,457
-222
9 Oct 2026, 16:16
93,679
-325
5 Oct 2026, 06:01
94,004
-377
28 Sept 2026, 19:37
94,381
-856
17 Sept 2026, 23:59
95,237
-166
15 Sept 2026, 20:58
95,403
-91
14 Sept 2026, 04:20
95,494
-162
12 Sept 2026, 11:21
95,656
-145
10 Sept 2026, 10:38
95,801
-260
7 Sept 2026, 07:01
96,061
-166
4 Sept 2026, 15:18
96,227
-78
3 Sept 2026, 00:36
96,305
-60
1 Sept 2026, 23:49
96,365
-74
31 Aug 2026, 21:56
96,439
-76
30 Aug 2026, 21:28
96,515
first reading
Engagement
866 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 159 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.79%
avg views ÷ 93,108 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,530
304 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.512%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
304
of 866 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 October 2026
Posts held
866 (5 August 2026 – 18 October 2026)
Views total
1,071,903
Reactions total
5,491
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Oct 2026, 22:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,330
Videos
≈440
Links
≈10,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
18m 15s
Average length
2m 17s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
17,653 reactions across 865 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
8,673
49.1%
🫡
3,683
20.9%
👍
919
5.21%
🔥
755
4.28%
😭
715
4.05%
😁
519
2.94%
👏
373
2.11%
😢
293
1.66%
🤓
221
1.25%
💯
177
1.00%
🤯
162
0.918%
😨
156
0.884%
🕊
155
0.878%
😘
141
0.799%
🤔
106
0.6%
🆒
100
0.566%
😱
98
0.555%
🥰
95
0.538%
😎
92
0.521%
🙏
53
0.3%
8 further kinds
167
0.946%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 866 of the 866 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,653 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 866 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 18 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ih_Rl8JtnUg This video covers the complete MUSCLE portion of Locomotion & Movement chapter...this is where students struggle with concepts. Once you go through the video, you will understand why Dr. Sharma is so special!!!
Sir how to extend question practice to 90 k questions like uplakshya goyal within 6 months I am trying but I can only come up to 150 questions per day combining phy bio and chem
Good afternoon sir.
Sir i want to share a great experience from target batch , sir jaise aapne ne btaya tha waise hi me roz class ke baad target batch se practice krni shuru ki. But sir 2 weeks se me hoapitalised thi few days back i came home. Sir aaj coaching me test tha, luckily whi chapters aa rhe the jinki mene question practice target batch se ki thi , revision ka time nhi mila and sir mne socha ki instead of n…
You can enroll in Masterclass in Biology from the link https://www.neetprep.com/neet-course/6228
🫡4
Showing the 12 most recent of 866 posts we hold for @NEETprep. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@NEETprep edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@NEETprep named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@anmol_ranjan_27 named in 1 post, 13 October 2026 – 13 October 2026
@thalassemia7 named in 1 post, 13 October 2026 – 13 October 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
NEET BIOLOGY - DR. NK SHARMA @mibdrnksharma · 31,550 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 4 September 2026
AiimsonianARS @aiimsonianARS · 94,746 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 15 August 2026
Avinash Sharma @Heyavinash2022 · 45,378 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 26 August 2026
Dr. Anand Mani @anandmani001 · 81,079 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 18 August 2026
Lakshya Ambastha @LakshyaAmbastha · 23,300 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 16 September 2026
Medico Om Official 💉 @medicoom · 22,032 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 20 September 2026
Anmol Sharma Sir Biology NEET UG @anmolsharmalive · 95,409 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 16 August 2026
ALLEN NEET Official 🩺 @ALLENNEETOfficial · 183,880 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 11 August 2026
Aman Tilak Organisation @amantilakorg · 177,450 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 11 August 2026
Deepak AIIMSonian @deepakaiimsonian · 25,420 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 12 September 2026
Gaurav Gupta NEET Physics (GG Sir) | NOTES, LECTURES, DPPS @Gaurav_sir_Physics · 27,880 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 9 September 2026
SANKALP NEET VEDANTU @sankalpneetvedantu · 74,236 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 19 August 2026
Tamanna Chaudhary @physics_tcarmy · 99,996 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 15 August 2026
NEET Wallah @neetwallahpw · 359,670 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 11 August 2026
PW AITS YAKEEN NEET TEST SERIES 2027 @PW_YAKEEN_NEET_AITS_TEST_SERIES · 35,511 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 8 September 2026
Ritu Rattewal Official @RITULIVE · 69,924 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 19 August 2026
NEET_Counselling_ADDA247 @NEET_Counselling_ADDA247 · 81,122 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 18 August 2026
Dr Manish Dubey MD SIR BMS @Dr_Manish_Dubey_MD_Sir_BMS · 38,519 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 30 August 2026
Akansha Karnwal Chemistry 2025 @Akansha_Karnwal_Chemistry_2025 · 45,166 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 26 August 2026
Pranav Pundarik @pranavpundarik01 · 45,517 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 26 August 2026
Unacademy NEET Toppers @unacademyneettoppers · 68,933 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 20 August 2026
NEET PYQS @NEET_PYQs_Previous_year_papers · 25,121 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 14 September 2026
🌟The Apron Boy🌟 @TheApronBoy · 86,301 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 17 August 2026
NEET ADDA247 @neetpreparationadda247 · 102,045 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 64 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NEETprep.com - PURE MCQ Practice & Testing Courses” (@NEETprep), 93,108 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NEETprep.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.