Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MeraX Official Channel

Channel

MeraX Official Channel

@MeraXOfficialChannel

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8,362subscribers

-5,749 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003963936360
TypeChannel
Username@MeraXOfficialChannel
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 22 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/MeraXOfficialChannel

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@MeraXOfficialChannel/49 · this entry29 Jun 2026, 16:59 UTC@BitNest_EnChannel/3320529 Jun 2026, 16:59 UTC1.00under a minute
@BitNest_EnChannel/3320630 Jun 2026, 13:42 UTC@MeraXOfficialChannel/50 · this entry30 Jun 2026, 13:47 UTC1.005 minutes
@BitNest_EnChannel/332114 Jul 2026, 13:49 UTC@MeraXOfficialChannel/53 · this entry4 Jul 2026, 13:49 UTC1.00under a minute
@BitNest_EnChannel/332128 Jul 2026, 15:22 UTC@MeraXOfficialChannel/54 · this entry8 Jul 2026, 15:23 UTC1.0072 seconds
@BitNest_EnChannel/332139 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC@MeraXOfficialChannel/55 · this entry9 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@BitNest_EnChannel/3321825 Jul 2026, 13:45 UTC@MeraXOfficialChannel/60 · this entry25 Jul 2026, 13:46 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@BitNest_EnChannel9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@BitNest_EnChannel (81)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 8 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 22 June 2026 to 31 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @MeraXOfficialChannel — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

8,36214,11111,236.57 August 2026 — 14,111 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,783 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,592 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,409 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,020 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,957 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,864 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,755 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,283 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,053 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,940 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,843 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,712 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,600 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,434 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,326 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,254 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,089 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,068 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,978 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,756 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,582 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,583 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,432 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,299 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,242 subscribers6 September 2026 — 9,921 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,579 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,554 subscribers19 September 2026 — 8,362 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 43 days, net -5,749. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,500–14,973 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 15:198,362-192
15 Sept 2026, 13:228,554-1,025
11 Sept 2026, 18:169,579-342
6 Sept 2026, 18:579,921-321
4 Sept 2026, 06:5910,242-57
2 Sept 2026, 17:3610,299-133
1 Sept 2026, 19:0310,432-151
31 Aug 2026, 18:2510,583+1
30 Aug 2026, 18:2410,582-174
29 Aug 2026, 16:1110,756-222
28 Aug 2026, 17:5710,978-90
27 Aug 2026, 20:4811,068-21
26 Aug 2026, 21:4611,089-165
26 Aug 2026, 01:1411,254-72
25 Aug 2026, 03:4111,326-108
23 Aug 2026, 20:0711,434-166
22 Aug 2026, 03:4911,600-112
20 Aug 2026, 19:1211,712-131
19 Aug 2026, 18:5811,843-97
18 Aug 2026, 16:2211,940first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,223 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
58247.6%
👍34328.0%
🤩897.28%
🔥725.89%
👏665.40%
🫡181.47%
💯161.31%
🤝161.31%
🎉110.899%
🏆60.491%
🥰30.245%
🤗10.082%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,223 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC≈8,940 views133 reactionsread 29 August 2026

📢 Announcement Regarding the Mera X Ecosystem Official Domain Upgrade To all Mera X global community members: To further enhance the access experience, usability, and overall service efficiency for our global users, the Mera X ecosystem has completed an upgrade to its official domain. Effective immediately, the new official access domain for the Mera X ecosystem is: https://merax.app/ This domain upgrade is part o

👍6851🔥8🤩3🥰3

31 Jul 2026, 12:57 UTC≈11,400 views75 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Mera X Global Team Liquidity Incentive Program Closing Announcement Dear Mera X Family Members: Today is July 31st, and the Mera X Global Team Liquidity Incentive Program is officially entering its closing phase. After nearly two months of intense competition and active participation from members in over 190 countries and regions worldwide, this global team liquidity incentive program has become a significant init

👍3530🤩7👏3

30 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC≈9,160 views43 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

Mera X Global Team Liquidity Incentive Program Final Sprint Announcement Dear Mera X Family Members: Today is July 30th, and there's only one day left until the official end of the Global Team Liquidity Incentive Program. This is not just an ordinary day; it's a crucial final sprint for every country, every team, and every community member. Over the past period, the global community has demonstrated Mera X's cohes

28👍10🤩5

29 Jul 2026, 13:55 UTC≈6,880 views60 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

Mera X Global Team Liquidity Incentive Program Final Sprint Announcement Dear Mera X Family Members: The Global Team Liquidity Incentive Program has only 3 days left until its end, officially concluding on July 31st. This is no longer a time for observation, but a crucial moment for a final sprint, summarizing contributions, completing registration, and driving team action. Over the past month, teams from multiple

27👍22🔥5🤩5🎉1

28 Jul 2026, 14:18 UTC≈6,230 views46 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

Hello everyone in the Mera X family! To help more new and existing users, as well as team members from various countries, better understand Mera X, we are officially releasing the "How to Participate in Mera X" tutorial document. The purpose of this tutorial is not to urge everyone to participate blindly, but to help every user understand what Mera X is, how to understand Mera Flow, what wallet security precautions

29👍11🤩3🏆2🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 12:20 UTC≈7,250 views54 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

Hello everyone in the Mera X family! To help more new and existing users, as well as team members from various countries, better understand Mera X, we are officially releasing the "How to Participate in Mera X" tutorial document. The purpose of this tutorial is not to urge everyone to participate blindly, but to help every user understand what Mera X is, how to understand Mera Flow, what wallet security precautions

33👏8👍7🔥3🤩3

25 Jul 2026, 13:46 UTC≈7,170 views43 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

Hello everyone in the Mera X family! To help more new and existing users, as well as team members from various countries, better understand Mera X, we are officially releasing the "How to Participate in Mera X" tutorial document. The purpose of this tutorial is not to urge everyone to participate blindly, but to help every user understand what Mera X is, how to understand Mera Flow, what wallet security precautions

👍2216👏2🤩2💯1

24 Jul 2026, 13:28 UTC≈7,910 views38 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Mera X Official Security Announcement A Reminder on Preventing Impersonation and Scams Involving Mnemonic Phrases, Private Keys, and Fund Transfers Dear Mera X Global Community Members: Recently, we have received feedback from users that some individuals are impersonating official Mera X staff, customer service representatives, team ambassadors, or technical personnel. They contact users privately under various pr

👍2010🫡4🤩3🎉1

23 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC≈6,820 views50 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Mera X Official Security Announcement A Reminder on Preventing Impersonation and Scams Involving Mnemonic Phrases, Private Keys, and Fund Transfers Dear Mera X Global Community Members: Recently, we have received feedback from users that some individuals are impersonating official Mera X staff, customer service representatives, team ambassadors, or technical personnel. They contact users privately under various pr

👍2715🤩4🫡4

20 Jul 2026, 13:57 UTC≈9,500 views61 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Mera X Official Security Announcement A Reminder on Preventing Impersonation and Scams Involving Mnemonic Phrases, Private Keys, and Fund Transfers Dear Mera X Global Community Members: Recently, we have received feedback from users that some individuals are impersonating official Mera X staff, customer service representatives, team ambassadors, or technical personnel. They contact users privately under various pr

35👍13🤩7🫡4🔥2

18 Jul 2026, 14:54 UTC≈9,490 views51 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Mera X Official Security Announcement A Reminder on Preventing Impersonation and Scams Involving Mnemonic Phrases, Private Keys, and Fund Transfers Dear Mera X Global Community Members: Recently, we have received feedback from users that some individuals are impersonating official Mera X staff, customer service representatives, team ambassadors, or technical personnel. They contact users privately under various pr

33🔥9🤩6👏2🤗1

9 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC≈13,300 views85 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Mera X Official Security Announcement A Reminder on Preventing Impersonation and Scams Involving Mnemonic Phrases, Private Keys, and Fund Transfers Dear Mera X Global Community Members: Recently, we have received feedback from users that some individuals are impersonating official Mera X staff, customer service representatives, team ambassadors, or technical personnel. They contact users privately under various pr

👏3227👍16🤩7🫡3

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @MeraXOfficialChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jun 2026, 13:48 UTCFinal Results5,240 voters approx.

Should we support extending the Global Team Liquidity Incentive Program for one month and adding additional MEC ecosystem incentives?

  1. A57%
  2. B43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MeraX Official Channel” (@MeraXOfficialChannel), 8,362 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MeraXOfficialChannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.