26 measurements spanning 29 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,798–16,856 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Sept 2026, 03:41
16,818
+7
3 Sept 2026, 10:01
16,811
+4
2 Sept 2026, 01:58
16,807
+1
31 Aug 2026, 00:17
16,806
-1
29 Aug 2026, 22:57
16,807
+2
28 Aug 2026, 20:49
16,805
-3
28 Aug 2026, 00:14
16,808
-5
27 Aug 2026, 00:53
16,813
+3
25 Aug 2026, 23:54
16,810
-4
25 Aug 2026, 00:28
16,814
-2
23 Aug 2026, 10:46
16,816
-11
19 Aug 2026, 19:34
16,827
-12
18 Aug 2026, 20:54
16,839
-3
17 Aug 2026, 21:34
16,842
+3
16 Aug 2026, 22:26
16,839
-1
15 Aug 2026, 16:38
16,840
-9
14 Aug 2026, 03:15
16,849
+10
12 Aug 2026, 21:56
16,839
+1
11 Aug 2026, 23:52
16,838
+5
10 Aug 2026, 20:38
16,833
first reading
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 11 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
116 reactions across 4 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
46
39.7%
👍
27
23.3%
🔥
21
18.1%
😍
5
4.31%
🙏
4
3.45%
⚡
2
1.72%
👏
2
1.72%
💯
2
1.72%
✍
1
0.862%
👌
1
0.862%
👎
1
0.862%
😁
1
0.862%
😘
1
0.862%
😢
1
0.862%
🤝
1
0.862%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2026 to 5 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
a Bernie Foster-esque 1980s retro-futuristic airbrush illustration, presented as a vertical sci-fi spaceship commercial poster. The main subject is a giant retro-futuristic starship slowly emerging from a deep black cosmic nebula. The ship's hull is constructed entirely of bright pink polished chrome alloy, with each armor seam precisely outlined by neon orange glowing lines. The engine nozzles utilize traditional ai…
a masterpiece by a world-renowned pen and ink printmaking master, this black and white print exemplifies maximalism. The pen and ink line drawings, in the style of Franklin Booth, are sketches reminiscent of Chinese landscape painting, depicting a gorilla picking peaches in a close-up. Set against a maximal background on white cardstock, the complex composition is rich in layers, the meticulous brushstrokes are full …
#nanobanana
a hyper-realistic cinematic fashion portrait that preserves the exact identity of the man in the photo. He is sitting in a minimalist pose, legs crossed, looking directly at the camera through designer sunglasses, the pose is relaxed and semi-lateral He is dressed in an expensive black structured leather jacket over a rich-colored silk satin shirt, black trousers, and polished black leather boots. A luxu…
the photograph features a creative panorama shot from a low angle. The green leaves obscuring the lens and the white sunlight streaming in from above create a play of shadows and a soft atmosphere. The main subject of the composition is a vast cranberry field, where the texture is clearly visible and droplets of water hang from the leaves. Rays of light break through the gaps between the flowers, revealing a view of …
🔥18❤13😢1
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @MidJourney. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
MidJourney AI Generated Art Gallery @MidJourneyAI1 · 33,761 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
Robots & Art — AI Images and Pictures @images024 · 56,834 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
PAUD CERIA @paudceria · 32,993 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“No Midjourney” (@MidJourney), 16,818 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MidJourney.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
