Channel
@midjourney_character
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,849subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001641920658 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @midjourney_character |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/midjourney_character |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 3,849 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:15 | 3,850 | +3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:21 | 3,847 | -6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 3,853 | +4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 3,849 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 3,852 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 3,854 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:59 | 3,856 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 3,859 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 3,857 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 3,856 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:20 | 3,853 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 3,853 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 20 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
51 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 43.1% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 27.5% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 11.8% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 11.8% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 3.92% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.96% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 5 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
3D rendered cartoon style, panoramic view, frontal perspective. The cotton candy model is tall and elegant, wearing a cotton candy-shaped hat, pink cotton candy-textured clothing, a pink cotton candy-shaped bag, cotton candy hair accessories, and pink high heels. The strawberry model is also tall and elegant, wearing a strawberry-shaped hat, bright red clothing with strawberry pulp texture elements, a red handbag, st…
❤5
#nanobanana create a highly detailed photograph of a live model at Comiket performing a cosplay based on this illustration. Accurately reproduce the exact same pose, posture, hand gestures, facial expression, angle, and perspective as in the reference image. Full-length shot, with a relaxed and playful atmosphere no midjourney • no midjourney character
👏6❤4
#nanobanana illustration by Alexander Jansson for a children's book, surreal, fabulous, imaginative, fantasy no midjourney • no midjourney character
👍7❤2
modern geiasha - street wear style , Art Poster, Screen print, bright and clean lines, Retro muted tones mixed with bold accent colors,Isolate in white background, In the style of Charles Burns --quality 2 --sref 17888 --stylize 75 ❤️ t.me/midjourney 🔷 t.me/midjourney_ru ❤️ t.me/midjourney_dark
❤4🥰3🔥2
a collection of 9 unique 3D cartoon PFP avatars, arranged in a nine-grid layout, featuring cute and fun trend y character designs, toy-like clay textures, smooth surf aces, expressive faces, and various accessories such as sunglasses and hats, The set includes studio lighting, vibrant colors, and a clean black background no midjourney • no midjourney character
❤4👍1🙏1
3D abstract animal illustrations, abstract art, exaggerated, elongated faces and eyes, slender limbs, thumbsup gesture, puppies giving thumbs-ups, flattened and distorted designs, abstract flat illustrations, contemporary art illustrations, blue background, oil painting texture, paint brushstrokes no midjourney • no midjourney character
👍6❤3🥰3
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @midjourney_character. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“No Midjourney Character” (@midjourney_character), 3,849 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/midjourney_character.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.