Channel
@Mustafa_Alpachachi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,672subscribers
-179 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001291290561 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Mustafa_Alpachachi |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Mustafa_Alpachachi |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:06 | 5,672 | +1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:37 | 5,671 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:41 | 5,673 | -6 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:25 | 5,679 | +6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 06:48 | 5,673 | -7 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:20 | 5,680 | +1 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 15:07 | 5,679 | -5 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 00:05 | 5,684 | -29 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 05:01 | 5,713 | -15 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 15:16 | 5,728 | -38 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 5,766 | -5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:20 | 5,771 | -15 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:36 | 5,786 | -18 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:15 | 5,804 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:29 | 5,811 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 5,814 | -12 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 5,826 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 5,834 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 5,843 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 5,841 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
65 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 56 | 86.2% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 6.15% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 4.62% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 3.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
التربية تعلن مواعيد امتحانات الدور الثاني للصفوف #غير_المنتهية ⭕️ تبدأ امتحانات المرحلة الابتدائية يوم الثلاثاء الموافق 9/15 لغاية الإثنين 9/21 ⭕️ امتحانات المرحلة الثانوية (المتوسطة والإعدادية)، يوم الثلاثاء الموافق 9/15 لغاية الخميس 9/24 .
❤4
#توضيح_هااام وزارة التربية تنفي بشكل قاطع اعتماد الدخول الشامل لطلبة الثالث المتوسط والسادس الإعدادي
❤10🤔3🤬2
تبدأ امتحانات الدور الثاني لطلبة السادس الإعدادي يوم 2026/8/26
❤8
الأنشاءات المرشحة للسادس الأعدادي 2026 / الدور الثاني #حسب_الاهمية #Unit_6 write a letter complain to your bank about the lack of ATM machines in the area اكتب شكوى الى البنك عن نقص اجهزة الصراف الالي #Unit_3 write an email to a friend asking them to come with you aboard this summer to do an English course اكتب ايميل لصديق ليأتي معك الى الخارج هذا الصيف لحضور دورة اللغة الانكليزية #Unit_3 write about the advantages…
❤15
الأنشاءات المرشحة للثالث المتوسط 2026 / الدور الثاني #حسب_الاهمية #Unit_2 Write an email invitation اكتب ايميل دعوة #Unit_6 write about a career of a real person اكتب عن مهنة شخص حقيقي #Unit_4 write about yourself اكتب عن نفسك
❤10👍3
File, posted without a caption
❤2
File, posted without a caption
❤6👍1
File, posted without a caption
❤1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @Mustafa_Alpachachi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 1 post on @Mustafa_Alpachachi as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الاستاذ مصطفى الباججي 📚” (@Mustafa_Alpachachi), 5,672 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mustafa_Alpachachi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.