Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for My face but better

Channel

My face but better

@MyFaceButBetter

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,539subscribers

+64 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001648065932
TypeChannel
Username@MyFaceButBetter
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 May 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/MyFaceButBetter

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,4396,5396,4897 August 2026 — 6,475 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,475 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,470 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,460 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,458 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,452 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,448 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,444 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,441 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,444 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,439 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,522 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,539 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net +64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,424–6,554 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 00:586,539+17
11 Sept 2026, 17:186,522+83
7 Sept 2026, 05:006,439-5
2 Sept 2026, 01:446,444+3
30 Aug 2026, 01:186,441-3
26 Aug 2026, 17:046,444-4
24 Aug 2026, 02:356,448-4
20 Aug 2026, 21:046,452-6
17 Aug 2026, 11:066,458-2
13 Aug 2026, 18:076,460-10
10 Aug 2026, 08:306,470-5
7 Aug 2026, 18:066,475no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:456,475first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

565 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
33659.5%
🔥18031.9%
👍295.13%
😍61.06%
🤔61.06%
🤩61.06%
😱20.354%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 565 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC975 views82 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Подброрка у нас сегодня просто блеск! Бывает, что хочется фестивалить всей душой, ну и тело чтобы тоже не отставало. В такое время важно найти и повод, и способ, который для вас легче. Если есть тяга именно к экспериментам с макияжем или бодиартом, не обязательно ограничиваться общемпринятым глиттер-гелем на скулах. Уши, пальцы, звездное небо на спине (прямо кант наизнанку!), или просто приклеить под один глаз все б

50🔥27🤩5

Signed Лена Игради

6 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC≈1,160 views110 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Я не большой фанат накладных и густо нарощенных ресниц. Не всех ресниц, конечно: ведь те, что нарощены деликатно и естественно, я никогда не подмечу. Не собираюсь никого критиковать. Раз уж я вечно выкладываю варианты с цветными бровями, расписными ушами и стикерами на ключицах, то что я могу иметь против густых опахал💋 Важно не как, а зачем это сделано, и достигается ли нужная цель. Если хочется просто попасть в об

95👍15

Signed Лена Игради

5 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC≈1,210 views96 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Наследница Анархического поста, рубрика «Вопрос-ответ» UPD Солнышко скрылось, муравейник закрылся. Остальные вопросы ждут новый пост Всё просто: можно задать мне любые вопросы, о макияже, о жизни, о работе. Я отвечу персональными кружочками. На что не смогу дать ответ: 💔 персональный подбор косметики по фото. Если мы с вами не работаем как профи + клиент, я не смогу взять на себя ответственность за ваши покупки

49🔥47

Signed Лена Игради

5 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC≈1,240 views118 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Регулярная вдохновляющая рубрика "с вашими стрелками все так" Я специально собираю в нее юных, конвенционально красивых моделей и актрис. Их красили профессионалы, с этими макияжами они снимались для фотопроектов и выходили на подиум. Но это не отменяет законов природы, и почти у всех них заметно разные глаза (бывает, что у них менее выраженная асимметрия, но она все равно есть). И на разных глазах, в плане размера

101👍11🤔6

Signed Лена Игради

4 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC≈1,260 views159 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я редко подписываюсь на визажистов, которые просто постят макияжи из студии и свои селфи. Обычно они очень классные по технике (разумеется!), но за пару недель похожий контент приедается. Но художница Дина из Петербурга перевернула мой мир и представление об аккаунте с макияжами. Это потрясающе. В общем, это вдохновляющая рубрика в том числе и для меня💔 Это высший пилотаж работы с референсами, больше чем макияж, объ

🔥10641😍6👍3😱2🤩1

Signed Лена Игради

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @MyFaceButBetter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Так и ходи
@freethecurls · 46,147
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
don't touch my face
@donttouchmyface · 55,185
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
Эволюция
@evo_lutio · 59,223
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“My face but better” (@MyFaceButBetter), 6,539 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MyFaceButBetter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.