Channel
@NASABULLSHIT
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,031subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001521484770 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NASABULLSHIT |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NASABULLSHIT |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 4,031 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 4,039 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 4,046 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 4,050 | -6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 4,056 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 4,057 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 4,061 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 4,064 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 4,068 | +20 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 4,048 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 4,049 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 4,049 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
106 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 66 | 62.3% | |
| 💯 | 30 | 28.3% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 4.72% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 3.77% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.943% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Je emoties bepalen letterlijk welke genen in je lichaam aan- of uitgezet worden. Toch behandelt de reguliere geneeskunde ze nog altijd als bijzaak. Emeritus hoogleraar Pierre Capel legt uit waarom dat een fundamentele fout is. Hoe emoties en gezondheid dieper samenhangen dan artsen je vertellen
❤11💯5
Zes jaar na de coronacrisis lopen er nog steeds rechtszaken tegen artsen die in 2020 patiënten hielpen met off-label medicijnen. Een nieuwe petitie roept minister Hermans op om in te grijpen en de vervolgingen te stoppen — terwijl de parlementaire enquête nog loopt. Corona voorbij, de heksenjacht niet: waarom worden deze artsen zes jaar later nog steeds vervolgd?
❤2🙏1
Er is natuurlijk niks aan de aant Gewoon dat men de zei tien minister city gaan daan.
💯1
Wauw wauw wauw wauw wauw wauw
A chilling, world-first study reveals how interactive screen time is impairing kids’ brains, sparking concern from parents across the globe. Yours, Steve Johnson Join: @Secrets_of_civilizations I found a hidden channel: "Banned Truth" check it out before it disappears
❤2🔥1
Tumoren die letterlijk door geluidsgolven worden vloeibaar gemaakt. Geen scalpel. Geen chemotherapie. Geen bestraling. Geen van die vreselijke bijwerkingen. Dit is histotripsie: gefocusseerde ultrasone golven vernietigen de kankercellen binnen enkele minuten op mechanische wijze, waarbij het gezonde weefsel volledig gespaard blijft. Blijf hier op de hoogte 📰✒️ 👉 https://t.me/CoVaNews
❤8🔥3🙏2
Final warning of Dr. Andrew Moulden before he was suicided by big pharma at the age of 49. His life’s work scrubbed from google and YouTube. You can still find some of his work on other search engines such as Yandex. ⚠️ EMERGENCY SYSTEM WARNING — ACCESS TERMINATION IN PROGRESS ⚠️ Your account has been placed into the final security queue due to abnormal activity and unverified status. This is NOT a routine message.…
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
💯18❤7
Denk je nu echt dat er voor deze a.i gestuurde preferente werkelijkheid dat jij onzichtbaar bent .en ook alles bekent .Je bent bekender dan dat je jezelf kent.Het gezegde niets is wat het lijkt is werkelijkheid. JOU elektronisch magnetische verschijning .Spoken verschijnen maar JIJ ook😂 WAT hebben ze de pakjes lang in slaap gehouden. We gaan het aanstonds zien..Het moet echt een galactische interventie worden .Vul z…
❤11
Have eyes to see... @StellaStarStern
❤1👍1
Even een vraagje WIE kan een gezinnetje 3 kinderen en dame onderdak geven zodat deze een 2 daags efteling bezoek willen brengen...datum weet ik nog niet.
❤1🔥1
Gevatte teksten
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NASABULLSHIT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aarde:Vlakte onder Dome. Ter nagedachtenis aan René ❤️” (@NASABULLSHIT), 4,031 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NASABULLSHIT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.