Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for НДФЛ в недвижимости - канал Татьяны Макуровой

Channel

НДФЛ в недвижимости - канал Татьяны Макуровой

@NDFL_nedviga

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,837subscribers

+62 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001230900140
TypeChannel
Username@NDFL_nedviga
DescriptionПолезные и актуальные вещи по вопросам НДФЛ при сделках с недвижимостью. Без воды. Риэлторам и продавцам недвижимости. Связь в телеграм @Tanjjja007
Created14 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/NDFL_nedviga

Topic

Real estate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,7686,8436,805.57 August 2026 — 6,775 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,772 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,770 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,768 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,788 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,792 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,789 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,792 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,791 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,788 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,789 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,788 subscribers1 October 2026 — 6,803 subscribers7 October 2026 — 6,812 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,834 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,840 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,838 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,843 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,837 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,836 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,837 subscribers6,8377 August 20265 November 2026
21 measurements spanning 90 days, net +62. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,757–6,854 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 06:506,837+1
27 Oct 2026, 12:456,836-1
24 Oct 2026, 08:576,837-6
21 Oct 2026, 07:366,843+5
18 Oct 2026, 13:176,838-2
15 Oct 2026, 23:096,840+6
13 Oct 2026, 09:476,834+22
7 Oct 2026, 15:386,812+9
1 Oct 2026, 00:016,803+15
16 Sept 2026, 06:226,788-1
12 Sept 2026, 06:196,789+1
8 Sept 2026, 00:406,788-3
31 Aug 2026, 01:286,791-1
28 Aug 2026, 08:426,792+3
25 Aug 2026, 07:046,789-3
19 Aug 2026, 00:456,792+4
16 Aug 2026, 08:086,788+20
13 Aug 2026, 05:066,768-2
10 Aug 2026, 11:116,770-2
7 Aug 2026, 20:376,772first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 23 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.4%
avg views ÷ 6,837 subscribers
Avg views / post
779
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held35 (23 April 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total3,896
Reactions total73
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 13:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
222
Videos
9
Links
165

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

690 reactions across 31 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥53978.1%
💯8111.7%
🤯7010.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 690 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (20.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 13:20 UTC471 views10 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Вдогонку. Есть собственно и второй связанный момент. Как я писала тут, по одной и той же сделке могут быть разные варианты расчета. ИИ может правильно сделать базовый расчет налога, и налоговая его примет без замечаний. В итоге клиент переплатит налог, потому что не учел варианты законной оптимизации. Часто это неочевидные механизмы, которые не решаются "промптом" типа "как снизить налог?"😁

💯9🔥1

Signed Tatiana Makurova

3 Nov 2026, 13:07 UTC486 views18 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Человек спросил у ИИ, сколько будет налог. ИИ ответил: 6,25 млн рублей, делайте вот так. Но... если и правда сделать так, как сказал ИИ, налог составит от 11,95 до 19,4 млн. А если сначала разобраться в ситуации и правильно всё выстроить ДО сделки — менее 5 млн. То есть ИИ одновременно не заметил лишние четырнадцать миллионов и не нашёл возможность сэкономить ещё полтора. Зато быстро и бесплатно – а это, как известно…

💯11🔥7

Signed Tatiana Makurova

2 Nov 2026, 09:22 UTC582 views26 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Три свежих примера. Три ответа налоговых инспекторов, и в каждом — грубая ошибка НЕ в пользу налогоплательщика и попытка вменить налоги там, где их нет вообще. Проблема в том, что человек, не вооруженный защитником в виде налогового консультанта, поверит КОМПЕТЕНТНОМУ ДОЛЖНОСТНОМУ ЛИЦУ ИЗ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОГО ВЕДОМСТВА и заплатит налог, которого вообще не должно быть. В двух случаях на скринах инспекторы не понимают усло…

💯12🔥8🤯6

Signed Tatiana Makurova

19 Oct 2026, 08:29 UTC997 views8 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Выступаю 24 октября на Форуме PRO-НЕДВИЖИМОСТЬ 2026 в Ставрополе, причем мое выступление на 3 (ТРИ) часа – пользы будет много. 25-го октября (воскресенье) для тех, кто был на моем блоке в рамках Форума (это важное условие, так как часть платного материала я уже дам 24 октября), предусмотрен формат отдельного платного обучения – законная неочевидная оптимизация в сделках с недвижимостью. Продолжительность – 4 часа. За…

🔥8

Signed Tatiana Makurova

12 Oct 2026, 12:46 UTC≈1,360 views11 reactionsread 7 November 2026

С 20 по 26 октября включительно ограничу личные консультации - уезжаю выступать в Ставропольский край и плюс закладываю там пару дней на отдых. Если у вас или ваших клиентов есть налоговая ситуация по недвижимости, которую нужно разобрать в октябре, направляйте запрос и документы до 17 октября включительно, чтобы вы успели ответить на все вопросы (обычно отправляю 30 и более вопросов), а я успела написать консульта…

🔥11

Signed Tatiana Makurova

1 Oct 2026, 13:21 UTC≈1,890 views35 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Никогда такого не было, и вот опять) Сколько ни обещали власть предержащие, что налоговое законодательство ужесточаться не будет, оно таки будет. Внесено несколько законопроектов в части НДФЛ, наиболее масштабный под 200 страниц внесен вчера, 30 сентября. Наиболее значимое ужесточение применительно к недвижимости – переход на пятиступенчатую шкалу 13-22% вместо 13-15% с 2027 года, причем с суммированием с другими на…

🤯23🔥9💯3

Signed Tatiana Makurova

30 Sept 2026, 09:08 UTC≈1,270 views32 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Я вернулась в нельзяграм - меня там не было несколько лет. Формат будет смешанный - как налоговая экспертиза, так и немного нерабочих фото, иногда сопряжённых с постами:) Пример нерабочей публикации на скринах. Такого контента в "телеге" нет и не будет, здесь канал у меня только по компетенциям, без личных моментов. Также, напоминаю, у меня есть группа в ВК: https://vk.ru/ndfl_nedviga

🔥32

Signed Tatiana Makurova

29 Sept 2026, 08:04 UTC965 viewsread 7 November 2026

Кто из юристов/консультантов готов 10-11 октября (сб-вс) в Москве на обучение (рабочее название программы "Парадоксы налогового законодательства" - идем в глубину, ликбеза не будет, сразу нюансы/сложное/неочевидное) - пишите мне в личку @Tanjjja007.

Signed Tatiana Makurova

29 Sept 2026, 07:04 UTC≈1,030 views45 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

«Консультация не нужна, у меня простой вопрос: какой будет налог по таким-то исходным данным (далее приводится цена покупки и продажи, кадастровая стоимость)?» Такие сообщения я получаю регулярно. А зачастую вопрос «какой будет налог?» звучит после «исчерпывающего» описания из двух слов: «Унаследовали квартиру». От эксперта ожидается короткий ответ в виде цифры, желательно сразу. Назвать цифру — дело трех секунд. За…

🔥31💯12🤯2

Signed Tatiana Makurova

21 Sept 2026, 13:54 UTC≈1,150 views9 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

24 сентября - форум Web Realtor в СПб. Постараюсь за 20 минут своего выступления дать пользу:) В целом программа там плотная, должно быть интересно:)

🔥8💯1

Signed Tatiana Makurova

18 Sept 2026, 07:04 UTC≈1,380 views8 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Программа на московский конгресс: 6 октября мой отдельный мастер-класс на 1.5 часа, 8 октября - участие в конференции. На пятницу 9 октября есть одно окно для тренинга в агентстве недвижимости.

🔥8

Signed Tatiana Makurova

18 Sept 2026, 06:57 UTC≈1,290 views11 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Начинается пора конгрессов и форумов, мой график гастролей на осень включает несколько городов (СПб, Москва, Ставрополь, Тюмень), в перерывах - несколько закрытых тренингов для агентств недвижимости.

🔥11

Signed Tatiana Makurova

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @NDFL_nedviga. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@NDFL_nedviga edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Sept 2026, 11:18 UTCAnonymous Poll47 voters

Опрос для юристов и налоговых консультантов. Кто готов на обучение в Москве после Конгресса, 9-10 (пт-сб) или 10-11 (сб-вс) октября? Ориентир по цене 25-30 тыс(25 тем,кто уже был на обучении для юристов в СПБ). Прошу голосовать только тех, кто точно готов

  1. Готов(а) 9-10 октября9%
  2. Готов(а) 10-11 октября9%
  3. Готов(а) в любом варианте дат6%
  4. Не готов(а), мне чисто посмотреть результаты)77%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Налоговая школа Вадима Баранча
@agentschool · 24,735
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 September 2026
Bezdelka - Безопасные сделки с недвижимостью, канал юриста Олеси БухтояровойR
@bezdelkaBuh · 31,688
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
Недвижимость и закон
@pravonadom1 · 29,218
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
Юридические Тонкости
@sivakovairina · 109,202
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НДФЛ в недвижимости - канал Татьяны Макуровой” (@NDFL_nedviga), 6,837 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NDFL_nedviga.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.