✅ Отопительный сезон стартует в Нижнем Новгороде Тепло в первую очередь подают в детские и лечебные учреждения, затем – в жилые дома, общественные здания и на предприятия. ➡️ До 4 октября по вопросам теплоснабжения работает горячая линия 439-18-24. 🔗 Нижегородская Стрелка Z Подпишись

Channel
Нижегородская Стрелка Z
@NN_strelka
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
48,587subscribers
+67 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001386976620 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NN_strelka |
| Description | Хорошие новости нашего региона |
| Created | 14 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NN_strelka |
Topic
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “Нижегородская Стрелка” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:14 | 48,587 | -122 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 48,709 | +1,582 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 47,127 | +203 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 46,924 | -155 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:41 | 47,079 | -134 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 47,213 | -124 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 47,337 | -88 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:08 | 47,425 | -75 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:57 | 47,500 | -61 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 47,561 | -96 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 47,657 | -88 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 47,745 | -125 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 47,870 | -83 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 47,953 | -45 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 47,998 | +310 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 47,688 | +730 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 46,958 | -279 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 47,237 | -432 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 47,669 | -215 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 47,884 | first reading |
Engagement
277 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.01%
- avg views ÷ 48,587 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,460
- 168 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 168
- of 277 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 277 (3 August 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 245,860 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 05:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈12,200
- Videos
- ≈910
- Links
- ≈6,720
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 12m 40s
- Average length
- 1m 09s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
✅ Объединенный коммунальный оператор вводит прямые расчеты за холодную воду В сентябре новый порядок начнет действовать в Московском районе Нижнего Новгорода. Плату за холодное водоснабжение и водоотведение автоматически добавят в личные кабинеты жителей. Собственники квартир в других многоквартирных домах могут перейти на прямые расчеты через свою домоуправляющую компанию. 🔗 Нижегородская Стрелка Z Подпишись
❗ Опубликованы предварительные итоги выборов в Нижегородской области После обработки 100% протоколов на выборах в Заксобрание «Единая Россия» набрала 52,97% голосов, КПРФ – 15,80%, ЛДПР – 11,52%, «Новые люди» – 8,91%, «Справедливая Россия» – 7,13%. На выборах в Госдуму кандидаты «Единой России» занимают первые места во всех пяти одномандатных округах Нижегородской области. Явка в регионе составила 57,21% – проголос…
➕ Свыше 28 миллионов рублей вложили в капремонт рентгенохирургического отделения Нижегородского кардиоцентра Ранее в операционной заменили ангиограф, теперь обновлены и остальные помещения отделения, система вентиляции и защита от рентгеновского излучения. Работы продолжались почти год без остановки диагностических и лечебных процедур и завершились к началу сентября. 🔗 Нижегородская Стрелка Z Подпишись
✅ 88,47% бюллетеней обработано на выборах в Заксобрание Нижегородской области «Единая Россия» набирает 53,62% голосов. Далее идут КПРФ – 15,49%, ЛДПР – 11,5%, «Новые люди» – 8,77% и «Справедливая Россия» – 6,97%. По России в целом на выборах в Госдуму по партийным спискам после обработки 90,43% протоколов «Единая Россия» набирает 57,86%. КПРФ получает 13,84%, ЛДПР – 8,9%, «Новые люди» – 7,94%, «Справедливая Россия»…
Нижний Новгород принимает электоральных экспертов из 9 стран в рамках региональной программы Всемирного фестиваля молодежи. Эксперты посетили участковые комиссии в школах, Штаб общественного наблюдения в Доме народного единства и информцентр облизбиркома в Кремле. Конечно, для иностранной молодежи подготовили насыщенную культурную и образовательную программу. Девиз фестиваля - «Следуй за мечтой. Вместе с Россией». …
✅ Общественный штаб не зафиксировал нарушений, которые могли бы повлиять на волеизъявление граждан Нижегородской области Мобильные мониторинговые группы с начала голосования посетили более 350 избирательных участков в Нижнем Новгороде, Дзержинске, Арзамасе, городе Бор и ряде муниципальных округов. На горячую линию штаба поступило 34 обращения – все они носили информационный характер. Наблюдатели за дистанционным эл…
✅ Нижегородский совет по земельным отношениям одобрил участок под Центр особо чистой химии в ННГУ Инвестиции в создание центра оцениваются в 1,37 миллиарда рублей. Он войдет в региональный Центр малотоннажной химии, а разработки будут использовать при производстве микросхем, микропроцессоров, сенсоров и светодиодов. Всего на заседании согласовали 13 инвестпроектов на 6,4 миллиарда рублей. 🔗 Нижегородская Стрелка Z…
✅ Иностранные эксперты высоко оценили ход голосования на Бору и в Городце В делегацию вошли представители девяти стран. Они посетили территориальную избирательную комиссию и несколько участков на Бору, а затем продолжили работу в Городце. Наблюдатели знакомились с организацией голосования и условиями на участках. В частности, один из экспертов отметил использование специального оборудования для слабовидящих избират…
✅ Федеральный эксперт Виктор Полянский: «Выборы проходят размеренно и в рамках закона» К первой половине 19 сентября мобильные группы Общественного штаба посетили более 250 избирательных участков в Нижнем Новгороде, Дзержинске, на Бору, а также в Павловском и Городецком округах. По данным штаба, нарушений, способных повлиять на волеизъявление граждан, не обнаружено. Около 70% нижегородцев, подавших заявки на дистан…
✅ Представитель Совета по правам человека Екатерина Сморода высоко оценила работу Общественного штаба За 18 сентября мониторинговые группы штаба посетили более 100 избирательных участков в Нижнем Новгороде, Дзержинске, на Бору, а также в Балахнинском и Богородском округах. По данным штаба, нарушений на участках и при дистанционном электронном голосовании не выявили. На горячую линию поступило шесть обращений информ…
По состоянию на 20.00 18 сентября общая явка избирателей на выборах в Нижегородской области составила 22,86%. Из 160 134 избирателей, включенных в список, голосующих с помощью ДЭГ, явка составила 58,64%. 🗞РБК Нижний Новгород в Максе
Showing the 12 most recent of 277 posts we hold for @NN_strelka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@NN_strelka edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 3 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 3 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@monitoring_52 · 4,7597 posts16 негритят
@Gubery · 84,1492 postsБашкирское жало
@bash_zhalo · 2,2931 postЖурналистика
@dddjournalism · 131,0331 postТеле Стрим
@infoagency_TS · 95,6511 postКолезев ☮️
@kolezev · 59,8811 postЗамгубернатора
@matrosou · 37,7431 postСодовая
@sodovaya · 1,6381 postВести Чувашии
@vestichuv · 1211 postВглушь
@vglush · 2,1161 postВолговятский - NEWS
@VolgaVytkaNews · 231 postЯмская Z телега
@yamskaya_telega · 1,2571 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@vovknn · 10,353#1
@kommersant_nn · 4,711#2
@glebnikitin_nn · 48,838#3
@izba_sorry · 4,003#4
@yuriy_shalabaev · 10,275#5
@nnrbc · 2,273#6
@gorkoNN · 7,229#7
@mash_nimash · 42,307#8
@prostrategy_52 · 4,411#9
@newsnn · 19,763#10
@nizhny01 · 36,453#11
@gtrk_nn · 12,755#12
@nn_ru · 55,120#13
@fanttvari · 3,566#14
@MoscowDigest · 152,617#15
@opennov · 1,764#16
@staraya · 90,826#17
@lyulin52 · 2,450#18
@dkabailo · 2,369#19
@nnprom · 3,357#20
@nnpravda · 8,949#21
@nasrat_news · 9,970#22
@zsno52 · 1,124#23
@moynnov · 215,577#24
@anufrieva_online · 1,600#25
@enpNN · 1,181#26
@sorokinhvost · 3,823#27
@mchs52 · 4,082#28
@Gillotina · 18,573#29
@presseco · 2,858#30
@nn_obl · 61,992#31
@bez_cenz_nn · 102,660#32
@nizhny801 · 5,265#33
@NN_now · 15,030#34
@nngiper · 52,668#35
@nizhny800 · 36,305#36
@opernn · 9,712#37
@shchelokov_aa · 3,092#38
@ivan_noskov_samara · 7,157#39
@kupnonn · 4,721#40
@dom_edinstva52 · 7,238#41
@uraldailyPeZerV · 12,584#42
@nizhniytop · 47,446#43
@pro_nino · 35,430#44
@metroHH · 4,928#45
@nlo_nn · 2,621#46
@nncorporation · 1,647#47
@today_nn · 82,791#48
@sledcom_nn · 2,753#49
@visitnizhny · 9,617#50
@mynnovgorod · 48,878#51
@TochkaUP · 232,128#52
@Businesslikes · 203,395#53
@cyberfreek · 84,304#54
@EazyUP · 199,983#55
@tikandelaki · 310,995#56
@boilerroomchannel · 226,154#57
@prodano5 · 73,120#58
@rtvimain · 184,370#59
@olegberkovich · 3,295#60
@emphasises · 26,114#61
@cyber_frontZ · 61,628#62
@FatCat18 · 105,848#63
@postnewsru · 43,096#64
@votBusiness · 120,146#65
@neproebusiness · 131,513#66
@stranavvvv · 57,370#67
@zvezdach_mag · 51,459#68
@bye_biden · 89,043#69
@lomovkaa · 333,309#70
@nesukhanova52 · 1,204#71
@gosplandcookies · 56,199#72
@FingersON · 104,585#73
@mediastanciacom · 116,287#74
@shchetinina_ov · 856#75
@boulevard_ring · 71,849#76
@onceuponmoscow · 131,636#77
@thegraschenkov · 163,136#78
@gneushev_a · 1,320#79
@bpz_ukraine · 90,344#80
@krispotupchik · 151,514#81
@meters2 · 78,872#82
@DeloPlus · 132,020#83
@planerka_org · 48,694#84
@dimsmirnov175 · 332,880#85
@RepostUZ · 91,198#86
@stone_developer · 121,149#87
@moscowlenta · 70,394#88
@belaya_kaska · 85,167#89
@gubernia52 · 374#90
@mediatech · 147,643#91
@olegtrofimov_unn · 2,111#92
@NeRestorani · 141,669#93
@FBR_channel · 148,051#94
@dauotkysit · 271,838#95
@banksecret · 58,596#96
@DeadHold · 148,041#97
@berdovaalena · 143,295#98
@vybora · 38,775#99
@politjoystic · 250,578#100
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@nngiper · 52,668
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 24 August 2026
@glebnikitin_nn · 48,838
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 26 August 2026
@pro_nino · 35,430
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
@mynnovgorod · 48,878
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 August 2026
@NNafisha · 22,719
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 September 2026
@nn_obl · 61,992
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
@novgorod_nizhniy · 113,657
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Нижегородская Стрелка Z” (@NN_strelka), 48,587 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NN_strelka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.