Channel
@Nataouan
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,691subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001077333931 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nataouan |
| Created | 8 October 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nataouan |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:03 | 2,691 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 2,692 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 2,695 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 2,696 | -7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 2,703 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 2,705 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 2,708 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 2,714 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 2,710 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 2,710 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 24 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
"البخاري والرسالة المزعومة: كذب واضح وفاضح" قال الشيخ نزار بن هاشم العباس حفظه الله: إن الشيخ البخاري لم يكن صادقا مطلقا فيما ادعاه في تلكم الرسالة المزعومة وأنه كتب إلي يطالبني فيها بأن أبين له وأكتب له ما لي من مآخذ عليه وملحوظات وأن أبادر بإرسالها إليه لينظر فيها إذا كان الصواب معي قال به وإذا كان معه قلت به. ادعى ذلك وزعم في رسالة ادعى أنه أرسلها إلي عبر وكلائه وإنها والله لمن الكذب الواضح والفاضح. فطالبته …
📌 قريبـــاً -إن شاء الله-.. القاصِف البازي على عرفات الكَذُوب الباغي وكشفُ جهلِه وتلبيسِه حول مسألة تسمية الله بـ(الشافي) 🌍 https://telegram.me/shnizaralabbas
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته الإخوة المشايخ وطلاب العلم الكرام لعلكم بخير جميعا،يرجى نشر ذلك على أوسع نطاق على شبكات الهاتف الجوال ليعرف القاصي والداني حال عرفات وزمرته من مشايخ عدن والمدافعين عن الباطل: "عرفات كذلك يقر البيلي على رمي العلامة الألباني بالإرجاء في قوله وافق المرجيءةوتكفيره للعلامة حسن بن عبدالوهاب البنا في قوله لايجوز الترحم عليه وقد ناقشته عندما قابلته العام الماضي في يوم الاثنين ٢٣ من شهر ربيع ال…
"البخاري يدافع عن هاني بن بريك.. والشيخ ربيع يقول: "لا تتواصلوا معه! اتركوه"" قال الشيخ نزار بن هاشم العباس حفظه الله: حين دافع شيخك البخاري يا عرفات عن هاني بن بريك عميل الإمارات ونفى خروجه ومخالفته لولي الأمر الشرعي، لصالح من كان هذا الدفاع؟! أليس لصالح الإمارات وحزبها الانتقالي؟! ثم علق الشيخ نزار في الهامش: 🎙️ قال البخاري في تسجيل له مدافعا عن هاني آنذاك: "ورماه بما هو منه براء، وادعى أن هاني بن بريك نزع يدا …
وهذا ربيع السنة وتبرئة الألباني من فرية وتهمة الإرجاء .. فهل هشام البيلي أعلم أم ابن باز وابن عثيمين وربيع السنة والنجمي والجابري ووو ..إلخ (الشيخ سيروان الأشقر حفظه الله) https://x.com/i/status/2081503667312562600 نتعاون على السنة.. قال العلامة ربيع -رحمه الله-: «انشروا للواضحين» https://t.me/Nataouan
غرد الشيخ سيروان الأشقر حفظه الله: يا شيخ فؤاد الزنتاني كنت في فسحة من أمرك ، منذ مدة؛ حتى تكلمت فورطت نفسك !! فالسلفي الذي يستمع لصوتيتك الأخيرة، والله يندهش من الضحالة العلمية والمنهجية التي أنت فيها.. بعد كل الفتن التي حدثت في الساحة الدعوية في السنين الأخيرة، تأتي وتكرر الأخطاء والتقعيدات -السابقة- الباطلة؟! https://x.com/i/status/2081758393832796526 نتعاون على السنة.. قال العلامة ربيع -رحمه الله-: «انشروا لل…
File, posted without a caption
⭕️ صوتية جديـــدة 📌 كَشْفُ تلبيساتِ المُتعصِّب الجَانِي «فؤاد الزِّنتاني».. 🔸🔹(الجــزء الثاني)🔹🔸 🖇 ويتضمَّـــن: • التعقيب على الزنتاني في تأصيله الفاسد. • وكشف إصراره على التعصب المقيت للبخاري. 🎙 لفضيلة الشيخ نزار بن هاشم العباس -حفظه الله تعالى- ١٨/ صفر/ ١٤٤٨هـ ١/ أغسطس/ ٢٠٢٦م 🔈 لسماع الصوتية: https://t.me/shnizaralabbas/2170 📌 وللرجوع إلى الجزء الأول: https://t.me/shnizaralabbas/2164 🌍 الصفحة الرسمية للشي…
"بالصوت: الزنتاني يقر بشرعية موقف الشيخ نزار ثم يكذب وينكر!" قال الشيخ نزار بن هاشم العباس حفظه الله: "أنت تكذب يا زنتاني، فأنت تعلم يقيناً؛ صوتيتك موجودة كوثيقة تقول: (يا نزار أنت معك حق أن تقف مع ولي أمرك ومع سلطانك ومع جيشك وتدافع عنه وتتكلم في المعتدي)" [ يقول الزنتاني في المقطع الصوتي: "أنا أقول لهم: نزار مع ولاة أمره، وأحدهم اعترض قال: كيف يتقدم نزار عن... في نازلة؟ إلا إني قلت له: النوازل من يحكم فيها؟ قال:…
مستند من أبو يوسف
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @Nataouan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نتعاون على السنة” (@Nataouan), 2,691 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nataouan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.