#shila #3 نفراول🥇:گوشی سامسونگS24ultra📱❤️ برندگانقبل: @etebar5533 فروشگاه: @Shop_5533 #اسپانسرخانممحمدی #قیمت جایزه👈182میلیون تومن جهت شرکت عکس بدید👇 @pvmodiir بیشترین لایک(👍)برندست✅(کانالمون👇) https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAFd7DUggLMkMSdUP0A
👍2🕊1

Channel
@NazareToChie
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
68,237subscribers
-3,720 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001700774253 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NazareToChie |
| Description | تبلیغات و طرح سوال فوری: @nazaretochie_ad . توام مشکلتو ناشناس برامون ارسال کن: http://t.me/DimChatBot?start=f8e6f879 . |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NazareToChie |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 68,237 | -159 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 68,396 | -144 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:40 | 68,540 | -151 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:59 | 68,691 | -157 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 68,848 | -251 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:59 | 69,099 | -225 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:55 | 69,324 | -91 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 69,415 | -75 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:13 | 69,490 | -89 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 69,579 | -75 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 69,654 | -88 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 69,742 | -87 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 69,829 | -89 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 69,918 | -75 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 69,993 | -64 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 70,057 | -65 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:49 | 70,122 | -151 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 70,273 | -152 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 70,425 | -132 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 70,557 | first reading |
864 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 101 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 506 of 582 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 864 (4 August 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,126,923 |
| Reactions total | 26,287 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 02:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
39,965 reactions across 701 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 14,691 | 36.8% | |
| 🤣 | 14,053 | 35.2% | |
| ❤ | 9,118 | 22.8% | |
| 👎 | 1,344 | 3.36% | |
| 🕊 | 352 | 0.881% | |
| 💋 | 247 | 0.618% | |
| 🍓 | 160 | 0.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 753 of the 864 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40,778 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 864 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#shila #3 نفراول🥇:گوشی سامسونگS24ultra📱❤️ برندگانقبل: @etebar5533 فروشگاه: @Shop_5533 #اسپانسرخانممحمدی #قیمت جایزه👈182میلیون تومن جهت شرکت عکس بدید👇 @pvmodiir بیشترین لایک(👍)برندست✅(کانالمون👇) https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAFd7DUggLMkMSdUP0A
👍2🕊1
ارسالی ناشناس: سلام بنظر شما برای ازدواج چه مدت زمانی برای شناخت لازمه؟ تعجب میکنم تو دو هفته یا دو ماه به شناخت میرسن و ازدواج میکنن، احساس میکنم خیلی اسون میگیرن ازدواجو شایدم من سخت گرفتم. و اینکه چند ماه بعد کات ازدواج میکنن با یکی دیگه، خب چجوری به این سرعت قبلیه رو فراموش کردن و با جدیده به شناخت کافی رسیدن که ازدواج میکنن؟ @NazareToChie
❤8👍4
هیچ آدمی، هیچ رفت و آمدی، هیچ اتفاقی نمیتونه به اندازه کنترل گری بیش از حد شما به بچه هاتون آسیب بزنه. شما فکر میکنین با کنترل زیاد میتونین مفید باشین ولی این موضوع نتیجه عکس خواهد داشت، لطفا به فرزندان خود حق انتخاب بدید و جای اونا تصمیم نگیرین. استقلال نهایت و با ارزش ترین چیزی هست که یه پدر و مادر میتونه به بچش یاد بده. @NazareToChie
👍38❤6
همهچی تموم شده، ولی شب هنوز ادامه داره. این پلی ایست برای فکرایی که فقط بعدِ ۱۲ پیداشون میشه🫶 @Mood
ارسالی ناشناس: یک نفر توی گروه هست که وقتی پیام میده، حتی اگر موضوع حرفش معمولی باشه، تو بیشتر از بقیه دقت میکنی و ارتباط بهتری نسبت به بقیه با اون داری اگه خواستی بگو کی هست؛ چه چیزی باعث شده برات متفاوت باشه؟ @NazareToChie
❤3👍1
^~^ @NazareToChie
💋17❤5🍓3
🦖 اپلیکیشن رسمی و بدون فیلترینگ TrexBet 📝 ورود و ثبتنام سریع ⚡ سریع، حرفهای و همیشه در دسترس!
🦖 فقط یک بازی از میکست لوز شده؟ پولت برمیگرده! میکس میبندی، هیجان بالا میره، اما یکی از انتخابهات خراب میشه؟ با پیشنهاد ویژه TrexBet، در صورت رعایت شرایط، میتونی ۱۰۰٪ مبلغ شرطت رو پس بگیری. همین الان وارد سایت شو و شرایط آسانش رو مطالعه کن! 💰 🦖 بونوس صدرصدی اولین واریز 🦖 واریز آسان، برداشت سریع 🦖 سرعت بالا، طراحی حرفه ای و تجربه ای متفاوت https://TrexBet.com T.me/TrexBet_Ir
❤1
ارسالی ناشناس: سلام دخترم 22 من تقریبا یک هفته پیش رابطه دو ماهم از طرفم دوست پسرم بدون اینکه از من نظری بخواد خیلی راحت کات شد یه روز بیدار شدم دیدم چتو دو طرفه پاک کرده و انفالوم کرده... حقیقتا اعتماد بنفسمو کامل از دست دادم ایشون کیس واقعا مناسبی بود و من یه مدت کراش بودم روش تا تونستیم باهم اوکی بشیم لطفا بگید الان رفتار درست چیه باید بهش پیام بدم بعد یه هفته بپرسم چرا این کارو کرده یا نه هیچ کار نکنم همینطوری …
❤11👍1
این بغل کردن هم واقعاً پدیدهی عجیبی هستها. میروی دواندوان دستهات رو حلقه میکنی به دور یک موجود زندهی دیگر و برای چند لحظه هم که شده دیگه دلت نمیخواد به سختی های زندگی فکر کنی. @NazareToChie
❤62👍13💋4🍓2🕊2
ارسالی ناشناس: سلام دخترم 18 با افکار خودکشی باید چیکار کرد وقتی نه شرایط تراپی رفتنو دارم نه میتونم با کسی درمیونش بذارم؟ اصلا بنظرتون خودکشی واقعا اشتباهه؟ راهکاری برای کنترل این افکار دارید؟ @NazareToChie
❤17💋5👍1
@NazareToChie
Showing the 12 most recent of 864 posts we hold for @NazareToChie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 39 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
چند وقت میشه که ممبر اینجا هستید رفقا؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ویژگی ظاهری افراد چقدر براتون اهمیت داره؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
صرفا جهت اینکه یه اطلاعات نسبی از ممبرای کانال دستمون بیاد..
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
نصف شبا رو معمولا به چی فکر میکنید؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
طرف مقابل یهو سرد میشه، تو کدوم تیپی؟!
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
از بین ترس های بنیادین بنظر خودتون کدوم یکی بیشتر تجربه کردید؟!
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 864 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@NazareToChie named 12 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نظر تو چیه؟!” (@NazareToChie), 68,237 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NazareToChie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.