Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for به جهنم درمانى”

Channel

به جهنم درمانى”

@HellTherapy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

30,920subscribers

+10,132 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001178257913
TypeChannel
Username@HellTherapy
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/HellTherapy

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

20,38630,92025,6537 August 2026 — 20,788 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,788 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,775 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,753 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,744 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,702 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,688 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,666 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,633 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,609 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,587 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,564 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,547 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,531 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,523 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,503 subscribers23 August 2026 — 20,471 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,437 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,420 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,405 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,386 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,419 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,533 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,716 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,820 subscribers2 September 2026 — 20,813 subscribers3 September 2026 — 20,819 subscribers5 September 2026 — 22,275 subscribers8 September 2026 — 30,920 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 32 days, net +10,132. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,806–32,500 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 12:3530,920+8,645
5 Sept 2026, 09:1622,275+1,456
3 Sept 2026, 11:5720,819+6
2 Sept 2026, 03:4720,813-7
1 Sept 2026, 03:4520,820+104
31 Aug 2026, 02:5420,716+183
30 Aug 2026, 00:1420,533+114
28 Aug 2026, 23:5420,419+33
27 Aug 2026, 22:1220,386-19
26 Aug 2026, 20:5620,405-15
25 Aug 2026, 22:5620,420-17
24 Aug 2026, 20:3720,437-34
23 Aug 2026, 05:2520,471-32
21 Aug 2026, 14:2920,503-20
20 Aug 2026, 13:5320,523-8
19 Aug 2026, 16:0420,531-16
18 Aug 2026, 18:5420,547-17
17 Aug 2026, 21:2320,564-23
16 Aug 2026, 19:0420,587-22
15 Aug 2026, 10:0420,609first reading

Engagement

343 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.15%
avg views ÷ 30,920 subscribers
Avg views / post
356
281 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
281
of 343 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 83 of 281 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held343 (1 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total99,938
Reactions total1,110
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 17:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,666 reactions across 112 posts, in 53 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣23814.3%
22113.3%
👍19911.9%
💔18511.1%
😭915.46%
😐905.40%
🔥653.90%
👎482.88%
😁462.76%
😨412.46%
🖕392.34%
👏362.16%
🥴352.10%
😍301.80%
🤡281.68%
🥰261.56%
🤔231.38%
🥱211.26%
🕊181.08%
🗿150.9%
33 further kinds17110.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 115 of the 343 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,666 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 343 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 22:25 UTC321 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026

بجهنم که به دیت هاتون این مدلی هیجان بدین چیه همش این کافه اون کافه ! حالا چجوری؟ دو نفر تو ایالت ماساچوست تصمیم میگیرن برای دیت اول همو ببینن و دختر خانم اصلا روحشم خبر نداشته قراره چی رخ بده براش . هیچی دیگه پسره میگه برو جلو فلان بانک نگه دار من میام سراغت. این پسره هم میره با اسلحه داخل بانک و دستبرد میزنه و فورا سوار ماشین دختره میشه و میگه فقط بگاز برووووو ! دختره هم نهایت میره پسره لو میده و اونم ۵ سال باید بر

😁12

2 Sept 2026, 22:20 UTC331 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026

بجهنم که چند وقت پیش ها یه فیلم وایرال شد که توش یه مراسم عقد کنون بود و یه دختر خانمی خیلی خوشگل و ناز میاد میگه اقای عاقد صبر کنید برای آقا داماد من سوپرایز دارم و حالا سوپرایز چی بود؟ گفت که مهریه منو لطف کنید ۱۴ شاخه گل رز و یه جلد کلام الله مجید بنویسید دیگه خلاصه این کلیپ مثه بنز صدا کرد و همه حسابی برا این دختر خانم اکلیلی شدن اماااااا متاسفانه وقتی جوگیر میشی دیگه راه برگشتی نیست و این دختر خانم همین اخیرا کل

👍192💔2

2 Sept 2026, 22:06 UTC349 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026

بجهنم که ۱۲ شهریور و پنجشنبه.

👍5🍓2

2 Sept 2026, 20:56 UTC357 viewsread 3 September 2026

کرم پودر فول کاور مک ۲۰۰ تومن: 🎀

2 Sept 2026, 20:54 UTC365 viewsread 3 September 2026

تونر ۷۰، بهترین ریمل ۶۰، این قیمتا هیچ‌جا نیست😐❤️

2 Sept 2026, 20:48 UTC372 viewsread 3 September 2026

پسرا 🤫این بادی اسپلش ویکتوریاسکرت و برای دوس دخترتون بخرید ٫ بعدش میاید ازم تشکر میکنید😈💦

2 Sept 2026, 20:46 UTC376 viewsread 3 September 2026

پوستم انقدر جوشای ریزودرشت داشت که خجالت می‌کشیدم از خونه برم بیرون. هزینه‌ی لیزر و دکترم خیلی زیاد می‌شد و رسما هیچ راهی نبود. تا اینکه یه‌نفر بهم این‌جا رو معرفی کرد و الان برای خودم سفیدبرفی شدم🫧 روشن کننده بیکینیم ک میخواستید اینجا داره😈🔥💦 @Sefiiid_shooow

Showing the 12 most recent of 343 posts we hold for @HellTherapy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

•نقطه‌چین•
@haparooutt · 35,754
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“به جهنم درمانى”” (@HellTherapy), 30,920 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HellTherapy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.