Channel
@molana
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,417subscribers
-23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001091733884 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @molana |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/molana |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 3,417 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:55 | 3,420 | -5 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 16:02 | 3,425 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:26 | 3,429 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 3,432 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 3,431 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 3,433 | -5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 3,438 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 3,439 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 3,440 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:20 | 3,440 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
56 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 41.1% | |
| 🕊 | 11 | 19.6% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 16.1% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 8.93% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 5.36% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 3.57% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 3.57% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.79% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2025 to 16 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
طرد شده برای مردن: بهای نادانی یک کبوتر بیدفاع که از بیماری PMV (بیماری نیوکاسل) رنج میبرد—با گردنی پیچخورده و ناتوان در خوردن یا نوشیدن به تنهایی—فقط به یک چیز نیاز داشت: دلسوزی. حقایق پزشکی میگویند او فقط به دو هفته تغذیه دستی و گرما نیاز داشت تا با ویروس مبارزه کند و به زندگی بازگردد. اما در این دنیا با چه چیزی روبرو شد؟ طرد شدن. بیرحمی. بیاحترامی. او از خانه بیرون انداخته شد. به سرما پرتاب شد تا تنها در …
🕊3❤2
هدف از زندگی فقط شاد بودن نیست، بلکه مفید بودن، شرافتمند بودن، دلسوز و غمخوار بودن است. تفاوت دارد كه فقط زندگی کرده ای یا خیلی خوب زندگی کرده ای. #رالف_امرسون @Molana
❤🔥2🕊1
تو چه دانی که ما چه مرغانیم هر نفس زیر لب چه می خوانیم تا در این صورتیم از کس ما هم نرنجیم و هم نرنجانیم #مولانا
❤4🕊1
حيواناتي كه مي خوري آن هايي نيستند كه با ولع حيوانات ديگر را مي خورند؛ تو جانوران گوشتخوار را نمي خوري، بلكه آن ها را الگوي خود قرار مي دهي. تو ولع مخلوقات كوچك و دوست داشتني را داري كه كسي را آزار نمي دهند، كه به دنبال تو حركت مي كنند، و تو در ازاي خدمتشان آن ها را مي خوري. (ژان ژاك روسو) 🆔 @Molana 👈کانال رسمی مولانا
❤1👍1
دین من کاهش رنج است دین من درک و محبت و مهربان بودن و ارزش قائل شدن با موجوداتی هست که از نظر شما کالا و خوراک و زباله بنظر میرسند دین من آن نیست که در سفره ام جنایت و قتل و رنج موجودی دیگر باشد و بعد برای خودخواهی کثیف خودم در پرستش خدا باشم @molana
🕊2👍1
قدرتنمایی قهرمان وگان پاتریک بابومیان او از بچگی گیاهخوار بوده و به گیاهخواری علاقه داشته به گفته او برای تبدیل شدن به یک گاومیش قوی و نیرومند نباید گاومیش خورد باید غذایی که گاومیش میخوره رو خورد قوی ترین و نیرومند ترین حیوانات این سیاره گیاهخوار هستند مثل فیل و زرافه و گوریل و اسب با سرعت دوندگی بالا انسان هم با روده های درازش و گوشتی که خام نمیتونه بخوره باید بپزه با کلی ادویه تا بتونه گوشتو بخوره در توهم گوش…
👏2🕊2
آیا گیاهخواران هم «قاتل» هستند؟ نگاهی عمیقتر به یک بهانه رایج یکی از رایجترین استدلالهایی که در برابر گیاهخواری مطرح میشود این است: "شما هم قاتل هستید! برای کشاورزی و برداشت محصولات شما، هزاران حشره و موجود کوچک از بین میروند!" این حرف در نگاه اول شاید منطقی به نظر برسد، اما در حقیقت یک بهانه هوشمندانه برای پنهان شدن از یک حقیقت بسیار بزرگتر و تاریکتر است. بیایید این ادعا را با منطق و آمار واقعی بررسی کنیم. …
❤6👏2
سوال این نیست که آیا میتوانند فکر کنن! و یا حرف بزنند! بلکه اینست که آیا می توانند درد بکشند؟
👏1
مصرف گوشت، زشت است، زیبا نیست! همین تصور، همین ایده که شما داری حیوانی را می کشی تا بخوری، زیبا نیست. #اشو
🥰1
پشت هر تکه گوشت داستانی است. داستان حیوانی که میخواست زندگی کند، حیوانی که ما نمیخواهیم در بارهٔ او و زندگیاش و مخصوصاً دقایق آخر زندگیاش چیزی بدانیم، حیوانی که دلمان نمیخواهد حتی یک دقیقه از تجربههای او را تجربه کنیم ولی مهمتر از همه: حیوانی که از روی ضرورت کشته نشده است بلکه فقط از روی هوس و ذائقه. پشت هر تکه گوشت داستانی است، داستانی که بیشتر ما در صورت آگاهی از آن به آن لب نمیزدیم و از این چرخهٔ انتخابی ظ…
❤1🥰1
انسان فکر میکند موجودی فرشته خصال است اما در واقع فرق زیادی با یک زامبی ندارد،در واقع ما یک مشت زامبی پیشرفته هستیم با باورهایی که انسان را از ماهیت اصلی خویش دور افکنده است #دنیل_دنت
❤1
اشرف مخلوقات!!!! را ببین مدام در کشتن و خون و کثافت می لولد همان که مدرک و سواد و داعیه اخلاق دارد
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @molana. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Molana | مولانا” (@molana), 3,417 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/molana.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.