Channel
@Nebras_arabic
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,747subscribers
-453 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001343648419 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nebras_arabic |
| Description | 💎 آموزش تخصصی زبان عربی 💎 ✅ فقط کافیه 2 ماه اصولی وقت بذاری✅ 🇮🇶 لهجه عراقی 🇦🇪🇧🇭🇰🇼🇴🇲🇶🇦 لهجه خلیجی 📝 محمد الجبوری سوالاتتون رو از اینجا بپرسین 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 @Nebras_admin صفحه اینستاگراممون https://instagram.com/nebras.arabic |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nebras_arabic |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 01:58 | 21,747 | -5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:59 | 21,752 | -1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 23:26 | 21,753 | -5 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:01 | 21,758 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 23:29 | 21,761 | -5 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 21,766 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 22:00 | 21,767 | -10 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 22:19 | 21,777 | -6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 19:20 | 21,783 | -15 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 20:21 | 21,798 | -13 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:07 | 21,811 | -3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 21,814 | -13 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:49 | 21,827 | -14 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:16 | 21,841 | -2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 10:06 | 21,843 | -16 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 06:11 | 21,859 | -8 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:06 | 21,867 | -9 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 06:25 | 21,876 | -10 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 07:28 | 21,886 | +1 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 06:58 | 21,885 | first reading |
177 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 177 (27 July 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 22,184 |
| Reactions total | 171 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 02:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,687 reactions across 177 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 783 | 46.4% | |
| 🥰 | 155 | 9.19% | |
| 👏 | 154 | 9.13% | |
| 👍 | 134 | 7.94% | |
| 🔥 | 104 | 6.16% | |
| 🤩 | 104 | 6.16% | |
| 🙏 | 65 | 3.85% | |
| 🤔 | 28 | 1.66% | |
| 👌 | 22 | 1.30% | |
| 😍 | 22 | 1.30% | |
| 🎉 | 20 | 1.19% | |
| 😢 | 20 | 1.19% | |
| ❤🔥 | 18 | 1.07% | |
| 😁 | 16 | 0.948% | |
| ✍ | 15 | 0.889% | |
| 💯 | 13 | 0.771% | |
| 🏆 | 11 | 0.652% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 0.178% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 177 of the 177 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,687 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 177 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (7.14%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
💡هلا والله - حیاک - مرحبا - السلام علیکم 🔖شروع و پایان مکالمه توی زبان عربی، از مهمترین بخش های یه مکالمه به حساب میاد و تاثیر فوقالعاده داره🤌 🟡کلمه مکالمه رو اینجا بفرستین 👇 🔴 @Nebras_admin ✉️ ویدیو رو بفرستین برای دوستتون که نمیدونه🫠 ♦️ @Nebras_Arabic
😍3🤔2🫡1
🔸پس این چندتا اصطلاحی که میگم رو خوووب یاد بگیرین تا از همون جمله اول حرفه ای به نظر بیاین 🔰
🎉2🤩1🙏1
❌اگه اول و آخر صحبتتون درست نباشه کل مـکالـمـه میریزه بهم!😨
🥰2👏1🤩1
Posted without readable text
🔥2👏1🥰1
السلام عــلــــیـــکم شلونکم؟ زینین؟ 😍
❤🔥2❤1👌1🔥1
📹 این ویدیو همون میانبریه که برای حل مشکلات موبایل و اینترنتِت تو سفر نیاز دارین 🔺 ببین، یاد بگیر، و سیوش کن که دیر یا زود لازمت میشه ✅
❤7🙏2👍1💯1😍1
🔻 تمام لغات و کلمات فنی که حتماً توی سفر به کارتون میاد رو توی ویدیوی زیر جمع کردم 👇
❤4👏1🔥1
برای کارهای مربوط به موبایل و اینترنت، عربیِ دستوپاشکسته جواب نمیده‼️ ✅ باید اصطلاحات دقیقِ خودشون رو بلد باشین تا کارِتون زود راه بیفته، نه اینکه نیم ساعت منتظر بشین ⏳
👍3🤩1🥰1
2️⃣ حالت دوم: کاربرد اصطلاحی (به معنیِ: نکنه… / مبادا… / شاید یه وقت…) توی این حالت اصلاً معنی ترسیدن نمیده! مثل یک ادات شرط و ابراز نگرانی برای اتفاقات احتمالی میاد و تغییر هم نمیکنه: 🇮🇶 خاف ما يوافقون؟ 🇮🇷 نکنه موافقت نکنن؟ 🇮🇶 استعجل، خاف يفوتنا القطار 🇮🇷 عجله کن، مبادا قطار رو از دست بدیم 🇮🇶 خابره، خاف نام! 🇮🇷 یه زنگ بهش بزن، نکنه خوابیده باشه!
🔥7🤔2🤩2🥰2
1️⃣ حالت اول: کاربرد فعلی (به معنی ترسیدن) اینجا دقیقاً همون فعلِ ترسه و مطابق شخص صرف میشه: 🇮🇶 هو خاف من المشکلة 🇮🇷 اون از مشکل ترسید 🇮🇶 لا تخاف، آني وياك 🇮🇷 نترس، من کنارتم / باهاتم تا اینجا سادهست اما داستان اصلی حالت دومه! 👇
❤5👍1🤩1
«خـــــــــــاف» 😱 عرب ها از این کلمه توی دوتا جایگاه متفاوت استفاده میکنن یکی فعلی و یکی اصطلاحی! 💡 یعنی چی؟ 👇
🥰4👏1🔥1
🔺 یه کلمه ۳ حرفی توی لهجه عراقی هست که ظاهرش خیلی سادهست اما تا کاربردش رو یاد نگیرین نمیتونین منظور دقیق عراقیها رو بفهمین! 💡
❤3👏1🤔1🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 177 posts we hold for @Nebras_arabic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
4️⃣ معنی عبارت « عزمنا کل الربع » چیه؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
1️⃣ کشورهای حاشیه خلیج فارس (لهجه خلیجی) به آدم مغرور میگن:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
نوبت شماست 👇 چطوری بگیم «امروز خیلی تشنه شدم؟»
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
حالا به نظرتون کدومش درسته؟ "یک هفته دیگه کلاسم شروع میشه"
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 177 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آموزش عربی «توی دو ماه» 😍💯 | نبراس” (@Nebras_arabic), 21,747 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nebras_arabic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.