Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net +1,554. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,855–23,067 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 00:01
22,812
+32
16 Sept 2026, 16:37
22,780
+402
14 Sept 2026, 17:17
22,378
+316
13 Sept 2026, 03:39
22,062
+25
11 Sept 2026, 06:57
22,037
-105
8 Sept 2026, 08:59
22,142
-128
5 Sept 2026, 03:20
22,270
+790
3 Sept 2026, 09:16
21,480
+97
2 Sept 2026, 03:34
21,383
-17
1 Sept 2026, 05:24
21,400
-17
31 Aug 2026, 05:03
21,417
-11
30 Aug 2026, 01:54
21,428
-13
29 Aug 2026, 03:47
21,441
-36
28 Aug 2026, 01:06
21,477
-27
27 Aug 2026, 04:35
21,504
-12
26 Aug 2026, 05:01
21,516
-28
25 Aug 2026, 05:56
21,544
-13
24 Aug 2026, 02:29
21,557
-48
22 Aug 2026, 08:45
21,605
+340
20 Aug 2026, 21:25
21,265
first reading
Engagement
69 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.76%
avg views ÷ 22,812 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,770
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 69 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
69 (12 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
10,620
Reactions total
141
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 15:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
13m 04s
Average length
1m 11s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,274 reactions across 69 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
474
37.2%
👍
452
35.5%
👌
112
8.79%
👏
78
6.12%
🎉
65
5.10%
🙏
50
3.92%
😍
30
2.35%
🥰
13
1.02%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 69 of the 69 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,274 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 69 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🖥 کنترل تکانشگری و
نوروفیدبک
🔹️ تکانه (Impulsivity) واکنش سریع و بدون تفکر به محرکهای درونی یا بیرونی است.
🔹️ افراد تکانشی معمولاً بدون در نظر گرفتن پیامدهای بلندمدت عمل میکنند.
🔹️ این رفتارها میتواند در خریدهای ناگهانی، قطع کردن صحبت دیگران، یا تصمیمات مالی نسنجیده خود را نشان دهد.
🔹️ تکانشگری گاهی بخشی طبیعی از رفتار انسان است، اما وقتی شدت مییابد، میتواند به مشکلات جدی در زندگی روزمره منجر شود.
…
❌ آیا توهین و فحش دادن اکتسابی و تربیتی است؟
«محتوا وانتخاب کلمات توهینآمیز» ۱۰۰٪ اکتسابی، تربیتی و محیطی است؛ اما
«ناتوانی در کنترل، مهار تکانه و شدت واکنش کلامی» ریشه در عملکرد و تنظیم سیستم عصبی دارد.
• محیط و تربیت: کلمات و شیوه ابراز خشم را در ذهن ذخیره میکنند.
• سیستم عصبی: ترمز کلام را در دست دارد؛ اگر قشر پیشپیشانی مغز بر اثر بلوغ، ADHD، اضطراب یا خستگی مزمن ضعیف عمل کند،
واژهها بدون فیلتر بیرون میریز…
چرا بعضی روزها بیحسیم و دست و دلمان به هیچ کاری نمیرود؟
این بیتفاوتی تنبلی نیست؛ سیستم عصبی زیر فشار مداوم روی حالت «انجماد» قفل شده است.
۳ راهکار فوری و برای خروج از این حالت
۱. شوک آب سرد: شستن صورت با آب سرد برای افت فوری ضربان قلب.
۲. حس کردن زمین: فشار دادن محکم کف پاها به زمین برای بازیابی تماس حسی با واقعیت.
۳. دید پانوراما: نگاه کردن به یک افق باز (بهجای زل زدن به گوشی) برای مهار مدار استرس.
───…
برای شروع هیچوقت دیر نیست!
🔹️ذهن ما توانایی شگفتانگیزی برای یادگیری و تغییر دارد، حتی در بزرگسالی.
🔹️مغز با هر تجربه جدید، مسیرهای عصبی تازه میسازد و انعطافپذیری را حفظ میکند.
⭕ پس اگر به فکر شروع کاری تازه هستی، نگران سن یا موقعیت فعلیت نباش!
🔸️ فقط قدم اول را بردار. هر تلاشی، ساختار مغزت را تقویت میکند.
نکته علمی: انعطافپذیری مغز (Neuroplasticity) باعث میشود تا یادگیری در هر سنی ممکن باشد؛ این قابلیت با…
🔥چرا زود «از کوره در میرویم»؟
این واکنش، لزوماً نشانهی اخلاقِ بد نیست؛ این «بیشباریِ سیستم عصبی» (System Overload) است.
وقتی مغز خسته یا تحت استرس مزمن باشد، قشرِ پیشپیشانی (بخشِ منطقی) توانِ کنترلِ تکانهها را از دست میدهد و آمیگدال (مرکزِ هشدار) زمامِ امور را در دست میگیرد.
نتیجه؟ شما با کوچکترین جرقهای منفجر میشوید، چون «تنگنایِ تحملِ» مغزتان بهشدت کم شده است.
این وضعیت یک مسئلهی بیولوژیک است که با …
تمرین: رها شدن از بند «مسئول همه چیز بودن»
🔆 “مرزهای مسئولیت” رو تمرین کن.
🔆 یک دایره روی کاغذ بکش و داخلش بنویس “کنترل من”.
🔆 همه چیزهایی که واقعاً مسئولشون هستی رو داخلش و بقیه رو بیرونش بنویس.
🔆 روزانه به این نقشه نگاه کن و قبل از هر “بله” گفتن از خودت بپرس: “آیا این واقعاً مسئولیت منه؟”
🔆 این تمرین مدارهای عصبی مرتبط با تشخیص مرزها رو تقویت میکنه.
─────────────
@neurofeedback_iran
ویژه پزشکان، روانشناسان و درمانگران
تئوری بدون مهارت بالینی ناقص است. «پارند آکادمی» با تمرکز بر تجربهی مستقیم بالینی، دانش شما را به مهارتِ حرفهای تبدیل میکند.
💎 دورههای تخصصی پارند آکادمی | شهریور ۱۴۰۵
با تدریس دکتر مسعود نصرتآبادی (پیشگام نوروساینس در ایران)
📍 مکان: دانشکده روانشناسی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
💥 حضوری و آنلاین
🇮🇱 آنچه شما را در اتاق درمان متمایز میکند:
تسلط عملی: تمرین مستقیم با دستگاههای ن…
⚠️ برای کمک نگرفتن، هیچ جایزهای نیست!
گاهی در اوج خستگی میگوییم: «من خوبم»، چون یاد گرفتهایم نیاز داشتن یعنی ضعیف بودن.
اما مغز ما در ارتباط با دیگران احساس امنیت میکند؛ بنابراین قرار نیست همه فشارهای زندگی را بهتنهایی تحمل کنیم.
👌 درخواست کمک، نشانه ضعف نیست؛ نشانه بلوغ روانی و احترام به خود است.
💾 به کودک درونت یادآوری کن:
«لازم نیست همیشه قوی به نظر برسی؛ اشکالی ندارد گاهی کمک بخواهی.» 🤍
─────────────…
اگر تمرینها کافی نبودند...
اما اگر با وجود تلاش:
➖ شروعکردن هنوز سخت است،
➖ کارها مدام نیمهکاره میمانند،
➖ تمرکز خیلی زود از بین میرود،
➖ یا فقط با اضطراب و فشار دقیقه نود فعال میشوید،
بهتر است علت این الگو دقیقتر بررسی شود.
ارزیابی بالینی و در صورت نیاز نقشه مغزی، میتواند به شناسایی عوامل مؤثر در چرخهٔ تعلل و انتخاب مسیر مناسب برای بیرون آمدن از این الگو کمک کند.
🍀 برای رزرو وقت ارزیابی اولیه
همبن حالا…
وقتی تعلل تکراری میشود،
حدسزدن دیگر کافی نیست.
نقشه مغزی QEEG در کنار ارزیابی بالینی،
میتواند به شناخت دقیقترِ الگوی عملکرد مغز
و عوامل مؤثر در چرخهٔ تعلل کمک کند.
وقتی این الگو روشنتر شود،
میتوان مسیر شخصیتر و مؤثرتری
برای بیرون آمدن از تعلل انتخاب کرد.
🎯 اگر میخواهید درباره الگوی تعلل خودتان راهنمایی اولیه بگیرید، زیر همین پست بنویسید:
«تعلل» | در دایرکت همراهتان هستیم. 🌱`
─────────────
@neurofeedba…
🥰 شاید تنبل نیستی؛ فقط ذهنت خسته است.
اگر تمرکز کم شده، تصمیمها را عقب میاندازی، کارهای ساده سنگین شدهاند و استراحت هم حالت را بهتر نمیکند، ممکن است ذهنت مدتها زیر فشار بوده باشد.
⚠️ فرسودگی ذهنی گاهی خودش را با تعلل، فراموشی و بیحوصلگی نشان میدهد.
تمرین امروز:
۱۰ دقیقه بدون گوشی، موسیقی، پیام و کار راه بروید یا بنشینید.
🎯استراحت واقعی یعنی کمشدن محرکها؛ نه رفتن از لپتاپ به اینستاگرام.
─────────────
@…
⭐ چرا کارها را شروع میکنی ولی تمام نمیکنی؟
شروع پروژه معمولاً هیجان دارد.
اما وقتی کار تکراری، مبهم یا سخت میشود، مغز دنبال محرک تازه میرود.
⚠️ ادامهدادن و تمامکردن هم مهارتاند؛ فقط انگیزه نیستند.
تمرین امروز:
هر بار که کار را متوقف میکنید، یک خط بنویسید:
«دفعه بعد از اینجا ادامه میدهم: ...»
مثلاً:
«فایل را باز میکنم و فقط جدول صفحه ۳ را کامل میکنم.»
🎯این جمله، شروع دوباره را بسیار سادهتر میکند.
…
❤8👍4👌1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @neurofeedback_iran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@neurofeedback_iran edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 69 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
نوروساینس و علوم شناختی-مدارس میان رشته ای @IDS_Neuro · 7,570#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
HI NEWS | اخبار فوری جنگ @hi_news1 · 79,789 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 25 August 2026
✨ آرتین فارکس ✨ @Artin_Forex2 · 21,498 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 September 2026
آموزش عربی «توی دو ماه» 😍💯 | نبراس @Nebras_arabic · 22,131 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💎 نوروفیدبک - ایران” (@neurofeedback_iran), 22,812 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neurofeedback_iran.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.