🚨🚨 Bitget reports approximately $351.6M in assets被盗 from its hot and warm wallets and has temporarily halted withdrawals. TECH

Channel
TECH
@New_ethio_album
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
42,503subscribers
+8,259 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001906109569 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @New_ethio_album |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 January 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/New_ethio_album |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 42,503 | +5,924 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:56 | 36,579 | +813 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 35,766 | +416 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:39 | 35,350 | +268 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 35,082 | +103 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 34,979 | +119 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 09:00 | 34,860 | -35 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 34,895 | +543 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 34,352 | +291 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:53 | 34,061 | +180 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 33,881 | +292 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 33,589 | +392 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:19 | 33,197 | +421 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 32,776 | +432 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 32,344 | +367 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 31,977 | +349 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:22 | 31,628 | +270 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:14 | 31,358 | -543 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 31,901 | -1,152 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 33,053 | first reading |
Engagement
521 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.16%
- avg views ÷ 42,503 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,770
- 335 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.313%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 335
- of 521 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 289 of 335 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 521 (13 August 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 591,864 |
| Reactions total | 1,744 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 02:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,250
- Videos
- ≈749
- Links
- ≈16,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 32m 40s
- Average length
- 33s
Measured directly from 59 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,050 reactions across 418 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 276 | 13.5% | |
| 👌 | 262 | 12.8% | |
| 🙏 | 235 | 11.5% | |
| 🔥 | 228 | 11.1% | |
| 🎉 | 223 | 10.9% | |
| ❤ | 220 | 10.7% | |
| 🤩 | 214 | 10.4% | |
| 👍 | 211 | 10.3% | |
| 🥰 | 181 | 8.83% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 418 of the 521 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,050 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 521 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🚀 Today’s Top Trending Coins 1. ASTRO 2. ONDO 3. PENGU 4. NEAR 5. LTC 6. EDEL 7. BP 8. FET 9. ZEC 10. EDGE 11. HYPE 12. DRV 13. PEAQ 14. SUI 15. BTC TECH
🤩4🥰4🙏3🎉1
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 The Federal Reserve has unveiled a proposed regulatory framework for stablecoin issuers under the GENIUS Act—aimed at strengthening oversight, ensuring reserve transparency, and safeguarding financial stability. #CryptoRegulation #Stablecoins #FederalReserve TECH
👍8🔥3
🔥🔥🔥🔥 Luke Gromen sees the dollar debasement trade reigniting—prompting him to double his exposure to gold, Bitcoin, and silver, with plans to steadily increase his positions. He argues this trend never really disappeared, and in times like these, Bitcoin proves to be your most resilient asset. 🔥 @Bitcoin_Insights Powered by Bitunix 👍 Best non-KYC futures exchange Save 30% on fees for life TECH
❤4🥰4🙏1
JUST IN: 🏛🔥 Ondo and BlackRock roll out tokenized investment portfolios for non-U.S. investors. TECH
💯3❤2👌1
🔥🔥🔥🔥 Tether has officially signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Pave Bank and GFTN to launch the Georgia–Singapore Fintech Scholars Program — a major step forward in expanding global fintech education and fostering international collaboration in financial technology. 🔥 @Bitcoin_Insights Powered by Bitunix 👍 Best non-KYC futures exchange Save 30% on fees for life TECH
🔥5🙏2
🔥🔥🔥🔥 VanEck says stay calm — even if Bitcoin falls to $78k. 🔥 @Bitcoin_Insights Powered by Bitunix 👍 Top non-KYC futures exchange Save 30% on fees for life TECH
🙏4🎉3👍3👌2
🔥🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🔥 Bitcoin hits $84,000. 🔥 @Bitcoin_Insights Powered by Bitunix 👍 Top non-KYC futures exchange Save 30% on fees for life TECH
❤8👍3👌2💯2
📊 JUST IN: Bitcoin reaches $84,000 TECH
🙏5👌3❤1
🔥🔥🔥🔥 Major UK banks — Lloyds, NatWest, Barclays, and HSBC — have successfully executed the world’s first interbank transactions using blockchain-based tokenized deposits. The live trials included real-world use cases such as mortgage payments and peer-to-peer transfers. This breakthrough could unlock faster, more efficient bank settlements, new forms of digital currency, and tokenized financial instruments — a qui…
🔥8👌6🎉4🙏2👍1
🔥🚀🚀🚀🚀🔥 Bitcoin reaches $83,000. 🔥 @Bitcoin_Insights Powered by Bitunix 👍 Top non-KYC futures exchange Save 30% on fees for life TECH
💯4👌3🥰3👍2❤1
📊 BREAKING: Bitcoin reaches $83,000 TECH
❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 521 posts we hold for @New_ethio_album. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@New_ethio_album named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 26 August 2026 – 26 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@dave_info · 6,774#1
@etonline27 · 9,666#2
@bighabesha_crypto · 14,782#3
@osmiteck · 57,225#4
@bighabesha_softwares · 120,658#5
@ETairdropOff · 4,914#6
@tikvahethiopia · 1,621,770#7
@FanosMarkets · 57,826#8
@li_appstore · 11,879#9
@EPL_CryptoNews · 212#10
@shamgamer · 266#11
@mindairdrop · 1,750#12
@remoteict · 1,141#13
@dagi_com1 · 85,330#14
@EthioTechnollogy · 5,487#15
@cryptotips1111 · 9,581#16
@EbacryptoToken · 298#17
@All_Coins_Daily_Comboo · 727#18
@monorixofficial · 1,336,669#19
@CnCrypts_Web3 · 275#20
@aarevenues · 8,125#21
@gemzcoincombo7 · 184#22
@Dune_Part_Three_Moviee · 30,179#23
@fintopionews · 2,263,869#24
@NOSISNBS_Parentsstudentsteacher · 464#25
@tsedaymekbib · 505#26
@hamidcryptotech · 62#27
@truebiobest · 597#28
@mrtababl · 4,216#29
@abigial10 · 1,092#30
@afleexac · 3,506#31
@Free_betting3 · 927#32
@tbebesolomonic · 1,957#33
@cryptowallet_news_en · 3,531,077#34
@avagoldcoin · 1,753,173#35
@mediarussia · 1,694,028#36
@hrprosperityparty · 648#37
@ukfixedmatches06 · 856#38
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Psychology_et · 108,641
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TECH” (@New_ethio_album), 42,503 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/New_ethio_album.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.