National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net +78,115. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 140,658–244,000 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 20:37
232,076
+191
16 Sept 2026, 15:40
231,885
+9,630
14 Sept 2026, 20:01
222,255
-276
13 Sept 2026, 08:41
222,531
+7,397
11 Sept 2026, 10:41
215,134
+14,584
8 Sept 2026, 14:19
200,550
+802
5 Sept 2026, 11:20
199,748
+460
3 Sept 2026, 16:21
199,288
-54
2 Sept 2026, 09:47
199,342
+126
1 Sept 2026, 07:06
199,216
-24
31 Aug 2026, 08:08
199,240
-34
30 Aug 2026, 07:17
199,274
+17,869
29 Aug 2026, 04:27
181,405
+24,442
28 Aug 2026, 03:34
156,963
+1,204
27 Aug 2026, 05:34
155,759
-47
26 Aug 2026, 05:42
155,806
+1,777
25 Aug 2026, 03:17
154,029
+77
23 Aug 2026, 16:18
153,952
+77
21 Aug 2026, 23:17
153,875
+105
20 Aug 2026, 16:05
153,770
first reading
Engagement
1,757 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 101 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.28%
avg views ÷ 232,076 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,290
1,081 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.188%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1,100
of 1,757 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1,060 of 1,081 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
1,757 (6 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
5,719,045
Reactions total
10,726
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 19:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈29,000
Videos
≈6,470
Links
≈868
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
55m 03s
Average length
1m 05s
Measured directly from 51 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,949 reactions across 954 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,826
48.5%
💔
1,959
19.7%
😢
740
7.44%
😭
697
7.01%
👍
633
6.36%
🔥
324
3.26%
👏
156
1.57%
🕊
137
1.38%
🫡
114
1.15%
👌
105
1.06%
💯
100
1.01%
😍
100
1.01%
🥰
28
0.281%
⚡
19
0.191%
👎
7
0.07%
😁
2
0.02%
🎉
1
0.01%
🤝
1
0.01%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 962 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,949 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 27 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 982 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Nuseirat1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 27 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔥 غدًا… النصيرات على موعد مع الحدث الأضخم! 🔥
🎓 لحظة طال انتظارها… وفرحة تستحق أن تُروى!
🦅 تخريج فوج «العنقاء»
🎓 الكلية الجامعية للعلوم التطبيقية
🚩 وسينطلق موكب الخريجين وموكب الكشافة
من مقر الكلية الكائن في سوق النصيرات – برج الساعة،
مرورًا بـ دوار النصيرات، وصولًا إلى موقع الحفل في
🏟️ صالة نادي خدمات النصيرات.
🕔 موعد الحفل غداً : الساعة الخامسة مساءً
🔥 كونوا على الموعد… فالنصيرات تستعد لليلة استثنائية! 🦅🎓
#الكل…
بعد وصولنا إلى ربع مليون مشترك 🎉❤️
أكملنا بحمد الله تشكيل فريق من المشرفين الميدانيين في مختلف أنحاء قطاع غزة؛ لنكون معكم من قلب الحدث، ونبقى الأقوى بكم وثقتكم. 💪
مستمرون معكم بتغطية دقيقة، ومصداقية لا نحيد عنها بإذن الله.
منكم وإليكم.. من رفح حتى بيت حانون 🇵🇸
🚫🔴أكثر من 4 طائرات استطلاع بأنواع مختلفة في اجواء النصيرات والزوايدة بالتزامن مع تحليق لطائرة كواد كابتر وطائرتي استطلاع كاتمة للصوت في الاجواء..
حفظ الله أبناء شعبنا
القناة 15 العبرية:
نشر أول: يدفع رئيس الحكومة نتنياهو نحو تنظيم زيارة لوزراء الكابينت إلى حدود قطاع غزة، قبل الانتخابات مباشرة.
وخلال نقاش أمني، اقترح نتنياهو تنظيم جولة للوزراء بهدف الاطلاع عن قرب على جاهزية الجيش الإسرائيلي والمواقع العسكرية الممتدة على طول الخط الأصفر.
وتوجه نتنياهو إلى وزير الدفاع كاتس قائلا: "يمكنك تنظيم ذلك".
استطلاع محمل بالصوارخ بشكل منخفض في اجواء مخيم النصيرات والزوايدة
😢3👍2❤1
Signed زكريا القطراوي
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,757 posts we hold for @Nuseirat1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@Nuseirat1 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
صفحة مخيم النصيرات @nusaairat1 · 39,177 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
البريج تجمعنا @alburaij · 55,223 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
أخبار مخيم المغازي🇵🇸 @MegaziPress · 23,343 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
مناشدات ومفقودين غزة @GAZA20249 · 33,311 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
شبكة وظائف فلسطين @jobspals2 · 45,841 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
🇪🇬 اخبار معبر رفح - رفح نيوز🇵🇸 @rafahbordernews · 22,477 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 September 2026
أخبار مدينة دير البلح 🌴 @DaerElbalah7 · 42,208 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي بالعربية | Israel Defense Forces in Arabic @IDFSpokespersonArabic · 43,658 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 August 2026
شادي صبح | shady sopoh | 🇵🇸 @shadysopoh · 21,959 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
الصحفية صافيناز اللوح_غزة @safypress90 · 42,775 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
اسامة الكحلوت @osama1984osama · 50,341 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
الناشط حمزة المصري @hamza20300 · 758,959 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 August 2026
الإعلامي أحمد سعيد @ahmedsaedd · 54,258 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
مساعدات القطاع الموثوقة (زكريا صلاح) @wwwwnnnw · 138,372 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
وزارة الصحة الفلسطينية/ غزة @MOHMediaGaza · 26,977 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
أمناء الإعلام @omanapal · 56,217 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
حسن اصليح | صحفي @hpress · 534,595 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 August 2026
معالي ابو سمرة ( صحفي ) @maaliepress · 23,086 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
🔴🔬مجهر النصر الاخباري🔬🔴 @mejhar · 23,035 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 September 2026
المتقدمون @mtqdmon · 532,038 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 August 2026
رفح الان الاعلامية @rafahalaan · 27,922 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 September 2026
المنخل @almon5ol · 23,394 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 September 2026
الناشط حمزه المصري @hemza20300 · 24,212 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 September 2026
إسماعيل الغول - Ismail Alghoul @ismail_gh2 · 28,298 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 95 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“صفحة النصيرات الإخبارية #غزة” (@Nuseirat1), 232,076 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nuseirat1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.