كاتس: في مواجهة إيران، لم تنجز المهمة بعد، تحاول إيران استئناف جهودها للحصول على سلاح نووي، وهو ما يعرض دولة إسرائيل لخطر حقيقي، ومن واجبنا أن نكون مستعدين لكل سيناريو.

Channel
صفحة النصيرات تجمعنا
@Nuseirat11
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
49,006subscribers
-3,958 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001634384757 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Nuseirat11 |
| Description | متابعينا الكرام يمكنكم الانضمام لمتابعة الأخبار العاجلة وأهم الأحداث عبر قناة النصيرات تجمعنا #المصداقية_في_نقل_الخبر #التغطية_مستمرة |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Nuseirat11 |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 00:44 | 49,006 | -59 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 20:31 | 49,065 | -44 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:57 | 49,109 | -30 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:51 | 49,139 | -30 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:56 | 49,169 | -44 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 15:30 | 49,213 | -50 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:56 | 49,263 | -76 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:07 | 49,339 | -49 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 11:41 | 49,388 | -48 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:36 | 49,436 | -39 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 14:20 | 49,475 | -47 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:40 | 49,522 | -34 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:21 | 49,556 | -28 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 15:08 | 49,584 | -42 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:16 | 49,626 | -46 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 11:25 | 49,672 | -32 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:11 | 49,704 | -66 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:01 | 49,770 | -46 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 08:56 | 49,816 | -28 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 09:21 | 49,844 | first reading |
Engagement
2,047 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 189 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.56%
- avg views ÷ 49,006 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 765
- 490 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.213%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 490
- of 2,047 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 366 of 490 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,047 (6 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 374,758 |
| Reactions total | 631 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 12:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈34,600
- Videos
- ≈22,800
- Links
- ≈329
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 35m
- Average length
- 2m 30s
Measured directly from 38 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,200 reactions across 686 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 751 | 62.6% | |
| 😢 | 131 | 10.9% | |
| 😍 | 54 | 4.50% | |
| 💔 | 53 | 4.42% | |
| 👀 | 40 | 3.33% | |
| 🔥 | 39 | 3.25% | |
| 🤬 | 39 | 3.25% | |
| 👍 | 27 | 2.25% | |
| 😭 | 23 | 1.92% | |
| 🫡 | 13 | 1.08% | |
| 👌 | 12 | 1.00% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 0.917% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 0.583% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 701 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,200 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 16 September 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 78 of 490 posts held from the last 30 days (15.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
4 إصابات إحداها بحالة خطيرة بقصف الاحتلال على بئر النعجة شمال قطاع غزة.
عاجل تفعيل الدفاعات الجوية في سماء طهران
هطول أمطار غزيرة على مدينة غزة وشمال القطاع في هذه اللحظات
💔4
أمطار غزيرة تتساقط الآن على مخيم النصيرات. كان الله بعون أهل الخيام..
💔3
⏪هيئة المعابر: حركة المعابر ليوم الأحد الموافق 08/11/2026: 🟢 معبر كرم أبوسالم يعمل 🟢 معبر رفح البري يعمل 🔴 منفذ زيكيم مغلق 🔴 منفذ كيسوفيم مغلق
❤1
هيئة البث الإسرائيلية عن مصدر: نتنياهو أرسل يستطلع إمكانية تشكيل حكومة وحدة وطنية وآيزنكوت رفض بشكل قاطع
إيران تعلن ازالة القيود على مدى صواريخها التي كانت حتى 2000 كلم وستعلن عن مدينة صاروخية جديدة نهاية الأسبوع لصواريخ بمدى فوق 2000 كلم
نشرت وكالة تسنيم الإيرانية اليوم خبراً يفيد بأن الحرس الثوري سيكشف عن مدينة صاروخية جديدة تحت الأرض، إلى جانب إنجازات عسكرية أخرى
الرئيس الإسرائيلي: أعلن تكليفي زعيم حزب يشار غادي آيزنكوت بمهمة تشكيل الحكومة
القناة 12 العبرية: مقربون من ترمب طالبوا آيزنكوت بتشكيل الحكومة سريعا وإقصاء نتنياهو
الدفاع المدني بغزة: أكثر من 2000 مبنى في القطاع مهددة بالانهيار ما لم يسمح بإدخال المعدات اللازمة للتعامل معها الدفاع المدني بغزة: نطالب الدول الضامنة لوقف إطلاق النار واللجنة الوطنية لإدارة القطاع بالتدخل لإنقاذ السكان الدفاع المدني بغزة: انهيارات جزئية في 3 مبان بالقطاع جراء الأمطار ما شكل خطرا على حياة المدنيين الدفاع المدني بغزة: القطاع يواجه كارثة إنسانية جراء غرق عشرات المخيمات ومراكز الإيواء بمياه الأمطار
❤3😢2
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,047 posts we hold for @Nuseirat11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Nuseirat11 edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 25 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 7 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Nablusgheer · 377,971#1
@Balata12 · 138,389#2
@mnart_hdaya · 159,857#3
@jeniincamp · 181,177#4
@balata_alhadat · 45,868#5
@nabuls_news · 180,926#6
@jenencamb · 196,239#7
@meshheek · 375,226#8
@qudsn · 603,792#9
@jeninnews1 · 223,510#10
@Jeninal3mliaat · 54,116#11
@Almustashaar · 828,643#12
@me7war313mokawama · 126,625#13
@jenin_today5 · 27,311#14
@jenenthorah · 14,532 (as read 24 August 2026)#15
@JININ_TULKARM_ALFIDA · 47,805 (as read 24 August 2026)#16
@rueib_alkian · 114,763#17
@rasedal3ado138e · 110,575#18
@yaseenpress2004 · 139,870#19
@samsalmohaiam · 65,200#20
@hamza20300 · 743,032#21
@rasdnourshams · 9,930#22
@saedalzaneen8 · 159,575#23
@mohamedaldakel · 4,592#24
@maydan_news · 142,370#25
@tulkrmeoon · 61,881#26
@ajanews · 1,303,949#27
@tadwena123 · 71,631#28
@AhrarNoorShams · 36,905#29
@abedallahsabha5 · 2,458#30
@Faracamp · 43,666#31
@APrees · 125,682#32
@balataalbld · 8,233#33
@noursams · 27,027#34
@tullkarm_green · 4,321#35
@tulkarembaladna10 · 55,797#36
@hpress · 518,430#37
@nablus_alnaar · 14,655#38
@towext · 4,971#39
@Nablispost · 44,217#40
@Shareunit · 37,007#41
@azzamaddas · 253,281#42
@Sa7et_nablus · 7,781#43
@ahrar_qalqilia · 3#44
@gazanewsnow2021 · 93,467#45
@nabulsi9l · 52,018#46
@fajernews · 149,336#47
@plesposts · 37,122#48
@ant_watny · 7,346#49
@z_x_g7 · 43,605#50
@From_hebron · 113,036#51
@TulkaremNet · 22,072#52
@Hadeel_eisaa · 136,748#53
@farounnn · 30,758#54
@PalpostN · 58,524#55
@VBnO4pp1lMzBi · 62,126#56
@almuhallel1 · 292,058#57
@MilitaRy2021 · 39,100#58
@nabulsi98 · 34,188#59
@Fe_khalal · 47,231#60
@Qabatyia · 57,211#61
@jeninnalmajd · 29,965#62
@rassd · 73,445#63
@almayadeen · 469,568#64
@AlQastalps · 107,034#65
@EabriLive · 229,033#66
@mehwaralmokawma · 102,818#67
@mumenjmmeqdad · 259,136#68
@dshjgj · 47,534#69
@abuKhaled8 · 3,594#70
@cwvcc · 3,192#71
@san3od · 1,881#72
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Shareunit · 37,007
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 31 August 2026
@nabulsi98 · 34,188
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 1 September 2026
@nesrr_martyrs115 · 18,791
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 1 October 2026
@Palestin27027 · 33,804
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 2 September 2026
@abdallahalhosare1 · 44,851
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 August 2026
@jhehehj · 51,109
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 24 August 2026
@taherzakarni · 44,727
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 August 2026
@ra_50_mm · 45,467
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
@jond_alQasaam · 28,043
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 8 September 2026
@bil_2022 · 37,170
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 31 August 2026
@nabulsi9l · 52,018
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 23 August 2026
@plesposts · 37,122
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
@BalaNews30 · 86,553
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 August 2026
@DelAlAsmar · 20,895
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 22 September 2026
@Gaza_00 · 28,306
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 8 September 2026
@z_x_g7 · 43,605
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 26 August 2026
@VBnO4pp1lMzBi · 62,126
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 21 August 2026
@alforgan_news · 29,167
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 7 September 2026
@jeninnalmajd · 29,965
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 5 September 2026
@rassd · 73,445
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 August 2026
@TahrirPulse1 · 18,502
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 3 October 2026
@dshjgj · 47,534
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 25 August 2026
@almajeeeed · 40,316
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 28 August 2026
@Palestine0377 · 32,185
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“صفحة النصيرات تجمعنا” (@Nuseirat11), 49,006 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nuseirat11.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.